38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

"Our legal system is colonial, not suited for the Indian population. The need of the hour is the Indianization of the Justice Delivery System," CJI NV Ramana

By LawStreet News Network      19 September, 2021 09:38 AM      0 Comments
Colonial Laws CJI NV Ramana Ashwini Upadhyay

In an event organized by the Karnataka State Bar Council to pay tribute to Late Justice MM Shantanagouder, who passed away earlier in April, CJI NV Ramana addressed those present and went on to make several important remarks pertaining to our current state of affairs.

In his speech, he said that the legal system is colonial in India and is unsuitable for the Indian population. CJI Ramana remarked that "The need of the hour is the Indianization of the justice delivery system." 

It is pertinent to note that not just CJI Ramana but Supreme Court Advocate Ashwini Upadhyay has also been relentlessly fighting against colonial laws and has filed several PILs in the Supreme Court emphasizing on the urgent need to replace colonial laws in India as a means to bring about fair and equitable justice. 

In furtherance of which, Upadhyay even addressed the public at Jantar Mantar on Aug 08, 2021, where he was invited as a guest speaker to sensitize the public about the urgent need to replace colonial laws with comprehensive and stringent laws that are in line with the requirements of contemporary India. 

In his address, Upadhyay stated that there are 221 Acts which were drafted before our country got independence and sadly these Acts still remain in force and govern the justice delivery system of the present-day India. The Indian Penal Code 1860, The Indian Evidence Act 1871, The Police Act 1861 are few examples of the colonial Acts which need to be replaced with more stringent and comprehensive laws.

CJI Ramana stated in his speech that, "When I say Indianization, I mean the need to adapt to the practical realities of our society and localize our justice delivery systems. For example, parties from a rural place fighting a family dispute are usually made to feel out of place in the court. They do not understand the arguments or pleadings, which are mostly in English, a language alien to them. These days, judgments have become lengthy, which further complicates the position of litigants. For the parties to understand the implications of a judgment, they are forced to spend more money".

He went on to provide his thoughts on equitable access to justice wherein he stated, "Rural people are left out and don't understand proceedings in English. They end up spending more money." 

"These days, judgments have become lengthy, which adds further complication for the litigants who are then unable to understand the implications of a judgment. They are forced to spend more money," he rightly noted.

Another topic of discussion was also the constitution of courts to be litigant friendly. "The common man should not feel scared of judges and courts. Courts should be comforting. The focus point of any legal system is the litigant. Courts should be transparent and accountable in nature," said CJI Ramana. 

To this, the CJI also noted that Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) would definitely help in saving resources and reducing the pendency of cases. 

Lastly, while remembering the last justice MM Shantanagouder, NV Ramana, noted, "The country has lost a common man's judge. He was interested in taking up the cases of the poor and the underprivileged while he was practicing ... His judgments were simple, abundant, practical, and immense with common sense ... He was always prepared for hearings. One thing which stood out was his sense of humor and infectious laughter. In spite of all his health reasons, he always came to sit for hearings. I asked him not to strain, and he said that he can't sit at home. He was built with a different fiber. He sat for hearings till the last day."

The address took place on Saturday (September 18, 2021).



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email