38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, March 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

There is no Longer Any Distinction Between Physical and Virtual Courts; Get Used to It': Justice AM Khanwilkar

By Atharwa Gauraha      05 November, 2020 07:17 PM      0 Comments
There is no Longer Any Distinction Between Physical and Virtual Courts; Get Used to It': Justice AM Khanwilkar

"There is no longer any distinction between physical and virtual hearings; get used to this," Justice AM Khanwilkar said while adjourning the appeal against the order of the Bombay High Court upholding the conviction of gangster Arun Gawli in the murder of Shiv Sena corporator Kamlakar Jamsednakar and the life sentence granted to him by the Special MCOCA Court.

The statement was made by the judge in reaction to a request by Advocate Brij Kumar Mishra who, because of the presence of several shapeless files, requested the matter to be taken up before a physical court. 

Justice Khanwilkar replied to Mishra by saying that the physical and virtual hearings were no longer different, and it was time to get used to the virtual hearings. 

Since the second week of March 2020, with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Supreme Court has been operating via video conferencing.

While the Supreme Court's judges' committee decided in August to revive  physical hearing on an experimental basis in some courtrooms, the change did not take off as very few advocates gave their consent on it.

As of September 1, the Court had classified 1000 cases for hearing in physical court. Yet only a handful of supporters agreed to a physical hearing.

Recently, after hearing it entirely via video conference, the High Court of Karnataka decided on the Franklin Templeton batch case. The High Court noted that the case showed that even complex matters could be heard and resolved in virtual courts without exceedingly voluminous documents.

Gawli's matter will now be listed after the Diwali vacations. He was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and various sections of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 and sentenced to life.

The 60-year-old Gawli, currently lodged at Taloja Central Jail, was convicted by a Special Court under the MCOC Act for the murder of Shiv Sena corporator KamlakarJamsandekar in 2012. Gawli was arrested in relation to the case in 2008 and has since been in prison.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM
prosecution-is-not-persecution-re-examining-the-constitutional-role-of-the-state-in-indias-criminal-justice-system-under-the-crpc-and-the-bnss
Trending Vantage Points
Prosecution is Not Persecution: Re-Examining the Constitutional Role of the State in India’s Criminal Justice System under the CrPC and the BNSS

Advocate Udit Arora examines how prosecution under CrPC and BNSS remains a constitutional duty—balancing justice, fairness, victim rights and protection of the innocent.

11 March, 2026 05:16 PM
sc-dismisses-mcgms-challenge-to-arbitral-award-holds-conduct-of-party-relevant-to-decide-jurisdictional-challenge
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses MCGM’s Challenge to Arbitral Award, Holds Conduct of Party Relevant to Decide Jurisdictional Challenge [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court dismisses MCGM’s challenge to arbitral award, holds party conduct relevant while deciding jurisdictional objections under Section 16 of the Arbitration Act.

13 March, 2026 12:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email