38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, December 17, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Plea Filed in Supreme Court to Declare Virtual Hearings a Fundamental Right

By Nargis Bano      25 August, 2021 01:24 PM      0 Comments
Plea Filed in Supreme Court to Declare Virtual Hearings a Fundamental Right

A lawyers' body has petitioned the Supreme Court to declare virtual mode of hearing as a fundamental right for lawyers and litigants.

Petitioner All India Jurists Association, a group of over 5,000 lawyers, asked the Supreme Court to overturn an August 16, 2021 notification issued by the registrar general of the Uttarakhand High Court stating that the Court will resume physical hearings and that no request for virtual hearings will be considered.

The plea emphasized that access to virtual courts is a fundamental right that no court of law can deny to any lawyer or litigant. Aside from Uttarakhand, the plea cited instances of Bombay, Madhya Pradesh, and Kerala High Courts compelling lawyers to appear in person.

"Access to virtual courts and conducting cases through video conferencing using information, communication, and technology is a fundamental right available to every lawyer under Article 19(1)(a) & (g) of the Constitution," it stated.

As a fundamental right, it cannot be defeated or waived on procedural grounds due to a lack of technology or infrastructure, or the inconvenience of the courts in dealing with them."

According to the plea, the HC's order is a death knell for the concept of Virtual Courts. The order contradicts the Supreme Court's e-promotion committee's of accessible and affordable justice.

It asked the Supreme Court to issue an interim order stating that no lawyer should be denied access to virtual courts or any category/class of proceedings before the High Courts under normal circumstances.

In addition to challenging the High Court of Uttarakhand's decision, the petition sought a directive prohibiting all High Courts from denying access to lawyers through virtual mode of hearing due to the availability of physical hearing.

The petition urged the Supreme Court to issue an order declaring that the right to access virtual courts via video conferencing for the purpose of attending and participating in the conduct of any case proceeding is a fundamental right guaranteed under Part III of the Constitution.

In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Supreme Court issued a detailed order on April 6, 2021 directing that all court hearings be conducted in virtual mode.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

working-wife-with-sufficient-income-not-entitled-to-interim-maintenance-but-childs-maintenance-must-be-paid-from-date-of-application-bombay-hc
Trending Judiciary
Working Wife with Sufficient Income Not Entitled to Interim Maintenance, but Child’s Maintenance Must Be Paid from Date of Application: Bombay HC [Read Judgment]

Bombay High Court rules that a working wife with sufficient income is not entitled to interim maintenance; child’s maintenance must be paid from the date of application.

16 December, 2025 09:01 PM

TOP STORIES

kangana-ranaut-slams-rahul-gandhis-vote-chori-claim-in-lok-sabha-questions-evidence-on-voter-fraud
Trending Executive
Kangana Ranaut Slams Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Vote Chori’ Claim in Lok Sabha, Questions Evidence on Voter Fraud

Kangana Ranaut challenges Rahul Gandhi’s voter fraud allegations in Parliament, reigniting debate on electoral integrity and institutional trust.

11 December, 2025 06:47 PM
sc-arbitrators-mandate-ends-after-statutory-deadline-substitution-mandatory-under-section-29a
Trending Judiciary
SC: Arbitrator’s Mandate Ends After Statutory Deadline; Substitution Mandatory Under Section 29A [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that an arbitrator’s mandate ends after the statutory period expires and mandates substitution under Section 29A for continued proceedings.

11 December, 2025 06:52 PM
sc-orders-aiims-to-form-secondary-medical-board-to-evaluate-passive-euthanasia-for-man-in-vegetative-state-for-13-years
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders AIIMS to Form Secondary Medical Board to Evaluate Passive Euthanasia for Man in Vegetative State for 13 Years [Read Order]

Supreme Court directs AIIMS to form a Secondary Medical Board to assess passive euthanasia for a man in a vegetative state for 13 years.

13 December, 2025 06:00 PM
endless-compassion-not-permissible-sc-bars-claims-for-higher-post-after-compassionate-appointment
Trending Judiciary
‘Endless Compassion Not Permissible’: SC Bars Claims for Higher Post After Compassionate Appointment [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that employees cannot seek higher posts after accepting compassionate appointment, calling such claims “endless compassion.”

13 December, 2025 06:54 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email