38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, November 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Plea Filed in Supreme Court to Declare Virtual Hearings a Fundamental Right

By Nargis Bano      25 August, 2021 01:24 PM      0 Comments
Plea Filed in Supreme Court to Declare Virtual Hearings a Fundamental Right

A lawyers' body has petitioned the Supreme Court to declare virtual mode of hearing as a fundamental right for lawyers and litigants.

Petitioner All India Jurists Association, a group of over 5,000 lawyers, asked the Supreme Court to overturn an August 16, 2021 notification issued by the registrar general of the Uttarakhand High Court stating that the Court will resume physical hearings and that no request for virtual hearings will be considered.

The plea emphasized that access to virtual courts is a fundamental right that no court of law can deny to any lawyer or litigant. Aside from Uttarakhand, the plea cited instances of Bombay, Madhya Pradesh, and Kerala High Courts compelling lawyers to appear in person.

"Access to virtual courts and conducting cases through video conferencing using information, communication, and technology is a fundamental right available to every lawyer under Article 19(1)(a) & (g) of the Constitution," it stated.

As a fundamental right, it cannot be defeated or waived on procedural grounds due to a lack of technology or infrastructure, or the inconvenience of the courts in dealing with them."

According to the plea, the HC's order is a death knell for the concept of Virtual Courts. The order contradicts the Supreme Court's e-promotion committee's of accessible and affordable justice.

It asked the Supreme Court to issue an interim order stating that no lawyer should be denied access to virtual courts or any category/class of proceedings before the High Courts under normal circumstances.

In addition to challenging the High Court of Uttarakhand's decision, the petition sought a directive prohibiting all High Courts from denying access to lawyers through virtual mode of hearing due to the availability of physical hearing.

The petition urged the Supreme Court to issue an order declaring that the right to access virtual courts via video conferencing for the purpose of attending and participating in the conduct of any case proceeding is a fundamental right guaranteed under Part III of the Constitution.

In light of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the Supreme Court issued a detailed order on April 6, 2021 directing that all court hearings be conducted in virtual mode.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

mere-use-of-word-arbitration-does-not-create-valid-arbitration-agreement-sc
Trending Judiciary
Mere Use of Word “Arbitration” Does Not Create Valid Arbitration Agreement: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that mere use of the word “arbitration” in a contract clause doesn’t constitute a valid arbitration agreement without clear intent.

08 November, 2025 01:14 PM
sc-issues-notice-on-plea-seeking-one-third-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice on Plea Seeking One-Third Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils [Read Order]

Supreme Court issues notice on plea seeking one-third reservation for women in all State Bar Councils to ensure gender equality in legal governance.

08 November, 2025 01:39 PM

TOP STORIES

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM
government-cannot-unilaterally-expand-labour-dispute-scope-without-workers-demand-himachal-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Government cannot unilaterally expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand: Himachal Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Government cannot suo motu expand labour dispute scope without workers’ demand, rules Himachal Pradesh High Court, holding termination issues need separate notice.

03 November, 2025 04:21 PM
child-welfare-committee-cannot-direct-police-to-register-fir-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Welfare Committee Cannot Direct Police to Register FIR: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Child Welfare Committees cannot direct police to register FIRs, rules Allahabad High Court, holding their powers are limited to children needing care and protection.

03 November, 2025 04:29 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email