38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, August 08, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Pledged not to take up post retirement roles to preserve independence of judiciary: CJI Gavai [Read Statement]

By Jhanak Sharma      04 June, 2025 06:41 PM      0 Comments
Pledged not to take up post retirement roles to preserve independence of judiciary CJI Gavai

NEW DELHI: Chief Justice of India B R Gavai has said many of his colleagues and he himself publicly pledged not to accept any post-retirement roles or positions from the government, in an effort to preserve the credibility and independence of the judiciary.

He said, if a judge takes up another appointment with the government immediately after retirement, or resigns from the bench to contest elections, it raises significant ethical concerns and invites public scrutiny.

"A judge contesting an election for a political office can lead to doubts regarding the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, as it may be seen as a conflict of interest or as an attempt to gain favour with the government. The timing and nature of such post-retirement engagements could undermine the public’s trust in the judiciary’s integrity, as it could create a perception that judicial decisions were influenced by the prospect of future government appointments or political involvement," he said.

The CJI stressed that every system, no matter how robust, is susceptible to issues of professional misconduct and sadly, there have been instances of corruption and misconduct within the judiciary.

"Such occurrences inevitably have a negative impact on public confidence, potentially eroding faith in the integrity of the system as a whole. However, the path to rebuilding this trust lies in the swift, decisive, and transparent action taken to address and resolve these issues. In India, when such instances have come to light, the Supreme Court has consistently taken immediate and appropriate measures to address the misconduct," he said.

Speaking in a roundtable in the UK Supreme Court on June 3, 2025 on 'Maintaining Judicial Legitimacy and Public Confidence', CJI Gavai said in every democracy, the judiciary must not only dispense justice, but also be seen as an institution that deserves to hold truth to power.

"In today’s digital era, where information flows freely and perceptions are rapidly shaped, the judiciary must rise to the challenge of being accessible, intelligible, and answerable, without compromising its independence," he said.

On steps taken to bolster public confidence through transparency, he listed out the decisions like public disclosure of assets by judges, live streaming of court proceedings, translation of court judgments in regional languages, free access to all judgments, and real time information on pendency of cases through National Judicial Data Grid.

"However, as with any powerful tool, live streaming must be wielded with care, as fake news or out-of-context court proceedings can negatively shape public perception. Only last week, one of my colleagues in a lighter vein counselled a junior counsel on the art of court craft and soft skills. Instead, his statement was taken out of context and reported in the media as, “Our ego is very fragile; if you offend it, your case will go out”," he said.

Unlike legislature or executive, whose legitimacy stems from the ballot, the judiciary earns its legitimacy by upholding constitutional values with independence, integrity, and impartiality, Justice Gavai said.

The CJI pointed out the foremost consideration is the perceived independence of judges, which hinges on their tenure conditions and appointment processes, which underscores the separation of powers within the legal system, allowing judges to function independently.

He also defended the Collegium system of appointment of judges.

"There may be criticisms of the Collegium system, but any solution must not come at the cost of judicial independence. Judges must be free from external control," the CJI said.

He said in India, a key point of contention has been the question of who holds primacy in judicial appointments.

Until 1993, it was the executive that had the final say in the appointment of judges to the Supreme Court and High Courts. During this period, the executive twice superseded the senior-most judges in appointing the Chief Justice of India, which went against established tradition, he pointed out.

In response, the Supreme Court of India, in its judgments of 1993 and 1998, interpreted the constitutional provisions concerning the appointment of judges to establish that the Chief Justice of India, along with the four senior-most judges of the Supreme Court, would form a Collegium responsible for recommending appointments to the Supreme Court, the CJI said.

"This Collegium, under the court's interpretation, would act unanimously in making its recommendations, and the opinion of this body would be final, thus ensuring the independence of the judiciary in the judicial appointment process. This system sought to reduce executive interference and maintain the judiciary’s autonomy in its appointments," he said.

The CJI further pointed out in 2015, the Supreme Court struck down the National Judicial Appointment Commission Act, 2014 on the ground that the Act diluted the independence of the judiciary by giving primacy to the executive in judicial appointments.

He also said the courts must have the power of independent judicial review, allowing judges to assess the constitutionality of laws and government actions that conflict with the provisions of the Constitution or established constitutional principles. Another crucial aspect is whether the judiciary acts as a counterbalance against the arbitrary exercise of power, he said.

The CJI also highlighted the importance of judgments to be accompanied by sound reasoning to enhance public trust, besides making courts accessible to the public.

Senior SC judge Justice Vikram Nath and former Additional Solicitor General of India and senior advocate Gaurab Banerji were also present on the occasion.

[Read Statement]



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Supreme Court reserves judgement on validity of Electoral Bonds; tells EC to furnish data on donations to Pol parties Supreme Court reserves judgement on validity of Electoral Bonds; tells EC to furnish data on donations to Pol parties

Supreme Court reserves judgment on Electoral Bonds' validity and instructs the Election Commission to provide data on political party donations. Get insights into the legal debate surrounding clean money in politics.

Supreme Court upholds abrogation of Article 370, mandates elections in J&K by September 2024 [Read Judgment] Supreme Court upholds abrogation of Article 370, mandates elections in J&K by September 2024 [Read Judgment]

In a historic verdict, the Supreme Court of India upholds the abrogation of Article 370, affirming the removal of Jammu and Kashmir's special status and endorsing the bifurcation into two Union Territories. The court also directs the Election Commission to conduct legislative assembly elections in J&K by September 2024 and urges the restoration of full statehood at the earliest.

Maratha reservation: Supreme Court will hear curative plea on Jan 24, 2024 [Read Order] Maratha reservation: Supreme Court will hear curative plea on Jan 24, 2024 [Read Order]

The Supreme Court is set to hear the curative plea on the Maratha reservation case on January 24, 2024. This article covers the latest developments in the legal battle over the Maratha community's reservation in Maharashtra, including the background of the case and the Supreme Court's previous rulings.

Supreme Court Collegium approves new Chief Justices for five key High Courts in India [Read Recommendations] Supreme Court Collegium approves new Chief Justices for five key High Courts in India [Read Recommendations]

The Supreme Court Collegium approves new Chief Justices for Allahabad, Jharkhand, Gauhati, Punjab & Haryana, and Rajasthan High Courts. Read about the appointments.

TRENDING NEWS

in-house-procedure-had-legal-sanctity-sc-dismisses-justice-varmas-plea-against-recommendation-for-removal
Trending Judiciary
'In-house procedure had legal sanctity,' SC dismisses Justice Varma's plea against recommendation for removal

SC upholds in-house probe into Justice Varma, dismisses his plea against removal; says process is legally valid and judge’s conduct lacked credibility.

07 August, 2025 12:05 PM
sole-testimony-of-victim-even-without-medical-evidence-sufficient-to-uphold-rape-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Sole testimony of victim even without medical evidence sufficient to uphold rape conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Victim’s sole testimony, even without medical evidence, sufficient to uphold rape conviction if found credible and consistent.

07 August, 2025 03:11 PM

TOP STORIES

bengaluru-court-convicts-ex-mp-prajwal-revanna-in-rape-case
Trending Judiciary
Bengaluru court convicts ex MP Prajwal Revanna in rape case

Bengaluru court convicts ex-MP Prajwal Revanna in rape case linked to explicit videos; one of four sexual abuse cases filed against him.

04 August, 2025 11:07 AM
sc-sets-aside-order-declaring-man-as-juvenile-on-basis-of-school-certificate
Trending Judiciary
SC sets aside order declaring man as juvenile on basis of school certificate [Read Judgment]

SC: School certificate from private school not valid proof of age, sets aside order declaring murder accused as juvenile.

04 August, 2025 11:24 AM
hp-may-vanish-in-thin-air-god-forbid-sc-on-ecological-imbalance-in-himachal-pradesh
Trending Judiciary
‘HP may vanish in thin air, God forbid', SC on ecological imbalance in Himachal Pradesh [Read Order]

SC warns HP may vanish due to ecological imbalance; seeks state’s action plan amid rising disasters, deforestation, and climate change threats.

04 August, 2025 11:31 AM
sc-grants-4-weeks-time-to-centre-to-frame-guidelines
Trending Judiciary
SC grants 4 weeks time to Centre to frame guidelines to ensure pedestrians right to use footpath

SC gives Centre 4 weeks to frame guidelines ensuring pedestrians’ right to obstruction-free, accessible footpaths under Article 21.

04 August, 2025 11:41 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email