38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, April 27, 2024
Legal Insiders

Prashant Bhushan Pays Fine in Contempt case against him

By Lakshya Tewari      15 September, 2020 07:04 PM      0 Comments
Prashant Bhushan Pays Fine in Contempt case against him

Senior Advocate and Human Rights activist Prashant Bhushan paid the fine of Rs. 1 on September 14, 2020. He deposited the fine in the Supreme Court Registry. The fine was taken from him in the contempt case over two of his tweets. He also told that he has been receiving funds from various parts of the country and with the help of that he will be creating “Truth Fund” in order to help and provide legal aid to those people who are jailed by the state for raising voice in order to dissent. He said that “The State is using all means to silence voices of dissent. The ‘Truth Fund’ will be used to protect the personnel liberty to those persons who face State’s persecution”. He also firmly clarified that submitting a fine does not mean that he has accepted the judgment; also, he filled a review petition. He said that “Me paying the fine of Rs. 1 does not mean that I accept the Supreme Court’s judgment. I am filing a Review Petition in the Supreme Court today”. 

The Supreme Court asked him to pay the fine till September 15, 2020, failing which have caused him a 3 months sentence and 3 years debarment from Supreme Court. It was August 31, 2020, when Justice Arun Mishra pronounced the sentence of fine in a contempt case. The bench said “If we do not take cognizance of such conduct it will give a wrong message to the lawyers and litigants throughout the country. However, by showing magnanimity, instead of imposing any severe punishment, we are sentencing the contemnor with a nominal fine of Rs. 1 instead”. 

Prashant Bhushan through his lawyer Kamini Jaiswal has filed another fresh petition in the Supreme Court of India seeking an intra-court appeal. In the appeal, he gives grounds such as international law, Article 14, 19, and 21 as a base to give allowance to the intra-court appeal. He further said that under Article 129 when SC takes suo moto cognizance there is no other judicial body for the person to appeal hence it violated the right to appeal. 

This whole thing started due to two tweets of human rights activist Prashant Bhushan in which he disgraced the Supreme Court of India and also Chief Justice of India SA Bobde. Affirming and justifying his comment, Bhushan on this whole thing said “My tweets were nothing but a small attempt to discharge what I considered to be my highest duty at this juncture in the history of our republic. I do not tweet in a fit of absence mindedness. It would be insincere and contemptuous on my part to offer an apology for the tweets that exposed what was and continues to be my bonafide belief. Therefore, I can only humbly paraphrase what the father of nation Mahatma Gandhi has said in his trial: I do not ask for mercy. I do not appeal to magnanimity. I am here, therefore, to cheerfully submit to any penalty that can lawfully be inflicted upon me for what the Court has determined to be an offense, and what appears to me to be the highest duty of a citizen”.  



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

whatsapp-has-threatened-to-exit-india-if-asked-to-break-end-to-end-encryption
Trending Top Stories
WhatsApp has threatened to exit India if asked to “break end-to-end encryption”

WhatsApp has threatened to exit India if directed by law to break end-to-end encryption offered on its digital messaging platform.

26 April, 2024 12:36 PM
sc-notice-to-ec-to-declare-elections-as-void-if-nota-votes-higher-than-any-candidate
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to EC to declare elections as void if NOTA votes higher than any candidate

SC asks EC to consider voiding elections if NOTA votes exceed those for any candidate, aiming to enhance candidate quality.

26 April, 2024 04:18 PM

TOP STORIES

a-critique-of-the-supreme-courts-adventurism-for-lgbtqia-rights
Trending Legal Insiders
Overreaching Jurisdiction: A critique of the Supreme Court's adventurism for LGBTQIA rights

In its over-enthusiasm to protect LGBTQIA+ rights, has the Supreme Court exceeded its constitutional mandate under Article 142? A Delhi University research scholar evaluates the theme.

22 April, 2024 10:48 AM
new-criminal-laws-watershed-moment-for-society-cji
Trending Legal Insiders
New criminal laws watershed moment for society: CJI [Read Inaugural Remarks]

CJI Chandrachud hails new criminal laws as a watershed moment, marking a significant overhaul for the justice system, emphasizing adaptation and technology's role.

22 April, 2024 11:26 AM
sc-grants-permission-for-medical-termination-of-pregnancy-of-14-yr-old-rape-survivor
Trending Judiciary
SC grants permission for medical termination of pregnancy of 14-yr-old rape survivor

Supreme Court grants medical termination of pregnancy to 14-yr-old rape survivor after assessing adverse health impacts, setting aside Bombay HC's decision.

22 April, 2024 12:14 PM
criminal-accused-won-more-seats-in-17th-lok-sabha-amicus-curiae-report
Trending Legislative Corner
Criminal accused won more seats in 17th Lok Sabha: Amicus curiae report

Candidates with criminal cases won more seats in the 17th Lok Sabha than those who led lawful lives, an amicus curiae report in the Supreme Court said.

22 April, 2024 01:45 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email