38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 03, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Punjab & Haryana High Court Justice Arun Kumar Tyagi Requests Bar Members to avoid addressing him as 'Your Lordship' Or 'My Lord'

By Snehal Khemka      05 March, 2021 02:57 PM      0 Comments
Punjab & Haryana High Court Justice Arun Kumar Tyagi Requests Bar Members to avoid addressing him as 'Your Lordship' Or 'My Lord'

In the light of words such as "My Lord" and "Your Lordship" reflecting relics of Colonial post, the Punjab and Haryana has issued a note requesting the Members of the Bar to avoid addressing Justice Arun Kumar Tyagi as 'Your Lordship' Or 'My Lord'. Furthermore, he has also urged Bar Members to also avoid the usage of words such as 'Obliged' and 'Grateful'. 

The rationale behind such an action is that these are terms and symbols attached with the long persisting slavery and hence should be strictly prohibited to be used in the courts throughout India as it is against the dignity of the country. Additionally, he also urges to be addressed in appropriate and respectful terms of attitude to the court such as sir instead of words like 'my lord' and 'your lordship'. 

Furthermore, multiple judges have expressed their desire to not be called in such terms including Justice K. Chandru of Madras High Court, Justice S Muralidhar and Chief Justice Thottathil B. Nair Radhakrishnan of Calcutta High Court to name a few. 

However, the judgment/order dismissing this PIL on 6 January 2006 could not be accessed. Reportedly, the Court had dismissed the PIL observing that it was a matter to be decided by the BCI as to how the Judges should be addressed. Following this, in 2007, the Kerala High Court Advocates' Association had unanimously resolved to stop addressing judges as 'My Lord' or 'Your Lordship'.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM
allegations-in-abetment-to-suicide-case-cannot-travel-beyond-contents-of-suicide-note-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Allegations in Abetment to Suicide Case Cannot Travel Beyond Contents of Suicide Note: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court quashes abetment to suicide case against 10 accused, holds complaint cannot go beyond contents of suicide note.

02 March, 2026 01:48 PM

TOP STORIES

ncert-introduces-judicial-backlog-and-corruption-in-class-8-curriculum-highlights-47-crore-pending-cases-across-courts
Trending Judiciary
NCERT Introduces Judicial Backlog and Corruption in Class 8 Curriculum, Highlights 4.7 Crore Pending Cases Across Courts

NCERT updates Class 8 textbooks to address judicial backlog and corruption, citing 4.7 crore pending cases and accountability mechanisms in India’s courts.

25 February, 2026 11:12 AM
delhi-hc-grants-jubin-nautiyal-ex-parte-injunction-against-ai-platforms-e-commerce-sites-for-personality-rights-violations
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Jubin Nautiyal Ex Parte Injunction Against AI Platforms, E-Commerce Sites for Personality Rights Violations [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants ex parte injunction to Jubin Nautiyal against AI platforms and e-commerce sites over unauthorised use of his voice, image and persona.

25 February, 2026 12:48 PM
voluntary-confessions-under-customs-act-are-valid-evidence-for-conviction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Voluntary Confessions Under Customs Act Are Valid Evidence for Conviction: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds voluntary confessions under Section 108 of the Customs Act are valid evidence to sustain conviction in smuggling cases.

25 February, 2026 12:54 PM
sc-rules-illegality-of-search-does-not-invalidate-evidence-seized
Trending Judiciary
SC Rules Illegality of Search Does Not Invalidate Evidence Seized [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds illegal search does not bar admissibility of seized evidence if relevant and legally admissible under law.

25 February, 2026 01:32 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email