38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, November 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Petition Filed in Supreme Court to take away Senior Designation from Advocate Mr. Rajeev Dhavan For Smoking Hookah During Virtual Court Hearing

By RITIK JAIN      20 August, 2020 03:58 PM      0 Comments
Petition Filed in Supreme Court to take away Senior Designation from Advocate Mr. Rajeev Dhavan For Smoking Hookah During Virtual Court Hearing

Recently, a video clip went viral highlighting Mr. Rajiv Dhavan smoking hookah during the virtual hearing in the case of Rajasthan Political Crisis matter before the Supreme Court. This gathered a lot of attention and criticism across the Bar. Lawstreet Journal (LSJ) was the first to break this news to its readers and the public in general.

The viral video has now formed the basis of a recent plea in the SC. The petition filed before the honorable Supreme Court seeks for Dr. Rajeev Dhavan's senior designation to be reviewed after he was seen smoking hookah during a video conferencing. 

The petitioner before the Supreme Court, Rashid Pathan, affirms Dhavan's act was "disgraceful in soiling the hallowed gown of Senior Counsel" and falls within the ambit of Section 2(c) of the Contempt of Courts Act read with Bar Council Rules relating to advocates' code of conduct. The plea reads:

"Under Rule 1 & 2 of Bar Council of India, Code of Conduct Rules, enjoins an advocate to act in a dignified manner before a Court & with self-respect. The term Court certainly includes a virtual Court, and the adherence to dignified conduct is a must without any known exception for a designated senior advocate."

Withstanding this recent incident, the appeal additionally rakes up past instances involving Dhavan, wherein he had warmed trades with Judges of the Court. 

The solicitor guarantees that the act like a Senior Advocate like Dhavan, which can defame the institution, likewise influences the applicant's right "of having a reputed and majestic judiciary un-un-smeared by senior advocates, for example, respondent-1 Mr. Rajiv Dhavan". All things considered; the applicant has appealed for Mr. Rajiv Dhavan to be deprived of his 'Senior' designation.

The petition filed in Supreme Court states that "...the conduct of Mr. Dhawan has smeared the image of Senior Counsel Designation synonymous with being carte blanche, to act pompous and roughshod the dignity of Honorable Courts.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

instigation-for-suicide-need-not-be-compulsive-suggestive-words-enough-to-attract-section-306-ipc
Trending Judiciary
Instigation for Suicide Need Not Be Compulsive; Suggestive Words Enough to Attract Section 306 IPC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that instigation for suicide under Section 306 IPC need not be forceful; even suggestive words implying the consequence can attract liability.

05 November, 2025 04:10 PM
public-ground-cannot-be-reserved-for-any-religion-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Public Ground Cannot Be Reserved For Any Religion: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras HC rules public grounds cannot be reserved for any religion, allowing Annadhanam on village land and holding that law-and-order fears can’t curb fundamental rights.

05 November, 2025 05:10 PM

TOP STORIES

hit-and-run-accident-case-sc-transfers-trial-involving-judicial-officer-from-punjab-to-delhi
Trending Judiciary
Hit-and-run accident case: SC transfers trial involving judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi

SC shifts hit-and-run case involving probationer judicial officer from Punjab to Delhi over alleged bias; orders potential further probe by Delhi Police.

31 October, 2025 11:27 AM
sc-issues-stern-warning-to-state-bar-councils-over-excessive-enrolment-fees-threatens-contempt-action
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Stern Warning To State Bar Councils Over Excessive Enrolment Fees, Threatens Contempt Action [Read Order]

SC warns State Bar Councils to stop charging over ₹750 enrollment fee or face contempt; directs BCI to issue circular, return applicants’ documents immediately.

31 October, 2025 11:32 AM
lawyers-cant-be-summoned-for-legal-advice-unless-covered-under-exceptions-of-sec-132-bsa-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers can't be summoned for legal advice unless covered under exceptions of Sec 132 BSA: SC

Supreme Court rules lawyers cannot be summoned for legal advice unless exceptions under Sec 132 BSA apply, safeguarding lawyer-client privilege and legal profession autonomy.

31 October, 2025 02:29 PM
conviction-us-138-ni-act-cannot-be-ground-to-stop-pension-madras-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Conviction U/S 138 NI Act Cannot Be Ground To Stop Pension: Madras High Court [Read Order]

Madras HC rules conviction under Section 138 NI Act is not moral turpitude and cannot justify stopping pension of retired employee; directs release of dues.

01 November, 2025 04:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email