38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, November 07, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Decision to Relax Dress-Code Only for Lawyers Discriminatory: Formal Group of Retired Judicial Officers Write to Gujarat HC [READ LETTER]

By Parth Thummar      01 June, 2020 01:42 PM      0 Comments
Dress Code for Lawyers Retired Judicial Officers Gujarat High Court

A retired group of Judicial officers in Gujarat State have written letter addressed to the Chief Justice of Gujarat and his brother judges on May 30, 2020, seeking relaxation in a dress code for judges of the subordinate judiciary in the line of relaxation granted to advocates, as a precautionary measure to contain the spread of COVID-19. 

They had claimed in the letter that they had formed a formal Association for Judges for the Judicial Officers, whether in-service or retired from service and the aim and object to form this association was to collect information regarding difficulties/problems, discriminations and issues faced by Judicial Officers at various levels and make representations for the same before appropriate authorities with intention to resolve such issues so that Judicial Officers can work under healthy, uniform working atmosphere and to bring a feeling of respect and dignity among them.

Earlier on May 15, 2020, the High Court of Gujarat had granted relaxation from wearing black coats and gowns for advocates appearing before High Court of Gujarat and Subordinate Courts vide Circular No.C.2605/2020. 

But they claimed that as far as Coronavirus and its infection are concerned it does not make difference between Lawyers and Judicial Officers. In this light, they had drawn reference to the Chief Justice of India who had earlier observed that he was of the view that judges, lawyers should not wear jacket and gown for the time being as it "makes it easier to catch virus". 

Aggrieved by differentiation done to the judicial officers, they wrote in the letter that, 

We undersigned are painfully surprised that such precautionary measure of protection to Judicial Officers of Subordinate Courts, to contain the spread of Coronavirus (Covid19) among them, is not considered at par with the Advocates while issuing this circular. This has brought a feeling of discrimination in the minds of Subordinate Judicial Officers and their family members.

In this light, they requested Judges of the Gujarat High Court to direct the concerned branch to issue similar circular and give relaxation to Subordinate Judicial Officers from wearing black coats as a precautionary measure to contain the spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19). 

Earlier on May 13, 2020, the Supreme Court was the first to notify after considering the medical advice, as a precautionary measure to contain spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection, that the advocates may wear plain white-shirt/white-salwar-kameez/ white saree, with a plain-

white neckband during the hearings before the Supreme Court of India through Virtual Court System till medical exigencies exist. 

 

 

 [READ LETTER]



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

injunction-suit-without-declaration-of-title-not-maintainable-when-possession-lies-with-defendant-sc
Trending Judiciary
Injunction Suit Without Declaration Of Title Not Maintainable When Possession Lies With Defendant: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that an injunction suit without a declaration of title is not maintainable when possession rests with the defendant.

06 November, 2025 03:25 PM
when-multiple-documents-on-same-property-are-challenged-court-fee-payable-only-on-principal-relief-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
When Multiple Documents On Same Property Are Challenged, Court Fee Payable Only On Principal Relief: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules that when multiple documents on the same property are challenged, court fee is payable only on the principal relief.

06 November, 2025 03:40 PM

TOP STORIES

conviction-us-138-ni-act-cannot-be-ground-to-stop-pension-madras-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Conviction U/S 138 NI Act Cannot Be Ground To Stop Pension: Madras High Court [Read Order]

Madras HC rules conviction under Section 138 NI Act is not moral turpitude and cannot justify stopping pension of retired employee; directs release of dues.

01 November, 2025 04:08 PM
activists-claim-they-only-called-for-peaceful-protests-seek-bail-in-sc
Trending Judiciary
Activists claim they only called for peaceful protests, seek bail in SC

Activists Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and others tell SC they only called for peaceful anti-CAA protests, deny conspiracy in 2020 Delhi riots, seek bail under UAPA.

01 November, 2025 04:19 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-centre-eds-response-on-bhupesh-baghels-son-plea-against-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC issues notice to Centre, ED's response on Bhupesh Baghel's son plea against arrest

SC issues notice to Centre & ED on plea by ex-Chhattisgarh CM Bhupesh Baghel’s son challenging his ED arrest in alleged liquor scam; ED asked to reply in 10 days.

01 November, 2025 04:29 PM
no-exemption-of-personal-appearance-of-chief-secretaries-in-stray-dogs-case-sc
Trending Judiciary
No exemption of personal appearance of Chief Secretaries in stray dogs case: SC

SC refuses exemption from physical appearance of Chief Secretaries in stray dog menace case; directs them to appear physically on Nov 3, citing non-compliance.

01 November, 2025 04:39 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email