38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 03, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Reputation is earned, needs protection', Law Commission for retaining criminal defamation as part of criminal laws

By LAWSTREET NEWS NETWORK      05 February, 2024 10:41 AM      0 Comments
Reputation is earned needs protection Law Commission for retaining criminal defamation as part of criminal laws

NEW DELHI: The Law Commission of India has said the reputation which is earned hard needs protection as it recommended but that the offence of criminal defamation should be retained within the scheme of criminal laws in the country. 

Reputation is something which can't be seen and can only be earned. It's an asset which is built in a lifetime and destroyed in seconds. The whole jurisprudence around the law on criminal defamation has the essence of protecting one's reputation and its facets," the panel headed by Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi said.

The Commission submitted its 285 th report on the law on criminal defamation to the Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal.

It examined various issues relating to the defamation laws and made its recommendations on a reference from the Ministry of Law and Justice received from a letter of August 4, 2017.

"It is important to keep in mind that right to reputation flows from Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and being a facet of right to life and personal liberty, needs to be adequately protected against defamatory speech and imputations," the Commission said.

The panel opined reputation being an integral facet of Article 21, it cannot be allowed to be jeopardised just because an individual has to enjoy his freedom of speech at the expense of hurting the sentiment of another.

It is to be understood that the restriction is not completely on one's thoughts and ideas. It is a protection that one can avail in a situation where his reputation is hurt. There is no absoluteness in any of the rights and both have to be harmoniously construed in its spirit to make the society peaceful and liveable," the commission said

In its 114-page report, the Commission noted that it may be argued that criminal prosecution for defamatory statements is opposed to the right of freedom of speech and expression. However, the protection of reputation is not the only impetus behind criminalising defamation as avoiding public disturbances is an equally important motivation, it said.

The Commission also said publications that harm a person's reputation are an inherent part of the political process in a democracy, and stifling the same would be endangering the political process.

It noted report by the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) found out that forty-two of the fifty-seven OSCE member countries have criminal defamation provisions in one form or other.

It also found out that nearly all OSCE member countries having criminal defamation provisions, provide for imprisonment as a possible punishment, and that the majority of these countries provide for imprisonment for a period of up to two years. Most of the member-countries of the OSCE are economically developed nations, and it is seen that the presence of criminal defamation provisions in such countries has not hindered the economic and political development, the Commission said.

The recently enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 also made a provision of community service as an additional punishment to the offence.

The law acknowledges that harm to reputation is not only an attack on an individual, rather an imputation on the whole society, for which the perpetrator may be punished to serve the community as an act of remorse. Through introduction of this punishment, Indian law has shown the most balanced approach in protecting one's reputation and speech too, it said.

The Supreme Court had examined the constitutionality of criminal defamation in Subramanian Swamy vs Union of India (2016) and dismissed the challenge to Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The SC had held it to be constitutionally valid on account of it being a reasonable restriction under Article 19(2) to the freedom of speech and expression enshrined in Article 19 (1)(a) of the Constitution, the panel said.



Share this article:

About:

Explore Comprehensive Legal Reporting with LawStreet Journal: Your Go-To Source for Supreme Court an...Read more

Follow:
TwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

President Murmu Approves Historic Criminal Law Reforms President Murmu Approves Historic Criminal Law Reforms

President Droupadi Murmu has given assent to three significant criminal law reforms in India, marking a historic shift in the legislative landscape. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, and Bharatiya Sakshya Act replace colonial-era laws, including the Indian Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure. However, these reforms have sparked debate, with critics raising concerns over potential constitutional violations and the risk of police excesses under the new arrest and custody provisions.

Plea filed in Supreme Court to stay criminal laws Plea filed in Supreme Court to stay criminal laws

A plea has been filed in the Supreme Court of India seeking suspension of three new criminal laws, raising critical concerns over their impact on fundamental rights and the legal framework. The petition argues these laws, namely Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, and Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam 2023, potentially increase police powers and create confusion among citizens.

Legal Seminar on Mens Rights || New Criminal Laws || Watch LIVE Legal Seminar on Mens Rights || New Criminal Laws || Watch LIVE

Join Save Family Foundation & Men Welfare Trust's Legal Seminar on Men's Rights, free on LawStreet Journal's YouTube. Focus on false cases against men.

This judge of Madras HC will not refer to IPC by its new name This judge of Madras HC will not refer to IPC by its new name

A Madras HC judge said that he would continue to refer to IPC, CrPC and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, by their original names as he doesnt know Hindi.

TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-allows-manufacturing-of-green-crackers-in-delhi-subject-to-no-sale
Trending Judiciary
SC allows manufacturing of green crackers in Delhi, subject to no sale

SC allows certified manufacturers to produce green crackers in Delhi, but bans their sale in NCR till further orders, balancing pollution and livelihoods.

27 September, 2025 01:23 AM
kerala-hc-directs-comprehensive-snakebite-prevention-guidelines-for-schools
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Directs Comprehensive Snakebite Prevention Guidelines For Schools [Read Order]

Kerala High Court directs comprehensive snakebite prevention and management guidelines for schools, ensuring safety, awareness, and emergency response.

30 September, 2025 08:46 PM
sc-orders-two-judicial-officers-to-go-for-seven-days-training-for-flawed-bail-order
Trending Judiciary
SC orders two judicial officers to go for seven days training for flawed bail order [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes flawed bail order, directs two Delhi judges to undergo 7-day special training on judicial conduct and bail rulings.

30 September, 2025 09:58 PM
sc-seeks-reply-from-iit-delhi-kharagpur-on-plea-to-transfer-student-due-to-mental-health-condition
Trending Judiciary
SC seeks reply from IIT Delhi, Kharagpur on plea to transfer student due to mental health condition [Read Order]

SC seeks reply from IIT Delhi & Kharagpur on plea for transfer of B Arch student citing mental health needs, AIIMS proximity & Article 21 rights.

30 September, 2025 11:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email