Audio generated successfully: /home/lawstreet/public_html/tts_output.mp3 SC allows judicial officers with 7 years experience as advocates to apply for district judges - LawStreet Journal
38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, October 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

SC allows judicial officers with 7 years experience as advocates to apply for district judges [Read Judgment]

By Jhanak Sharma      09 October, 2025 11:07 AM      0 Comments
SC allows judicial officers with 7 years experience as advocates to apply for district judges

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Thursday declared that the judicial officers who have already completed seven years of practice at the Bar before joining the service would be eligible for appointment as district judges.

A five-judge Constitution bench led by Chief Justice of India B R Gavai also held the judicial officers with a combined seven years of experience as subordinate court judge and advocates would qualify for direct recruitment to the post of district judges.

The judgment comes as a big relief to the civil judges (junior division) who have to wait for 15 to 20 years of service before their promotion to the post of Additional District Judges, as now they can appear in higher judicial services examination for their promotion with seven years experience.

The court directed the state governments to frame rules specifying eligibility for in-service candidates.

The bench also clarified that the eligibility would be assessed at the time of selection.

"To maintain a level playing field, the minimum age for applying as a district judge or additional district judge will be 35 years on the date of application," the bench said.

Pronouncing the judgment, the CJI rejected the claim that Article 233(2) reserved a 25% quota for direct recruits.

The court held members of the judicial service had faced injustice. The bench clarified its ruling will apply from the date of the judgment, except in cases where the High Court has passed interim orders.

The bench stressed that statutory interpretation must align contextually, not in isolation.

"A holistic reading of Article 233 of the Constitution shows that while clause 2 specifies qualifications for in-service candidates, it does not detail qualifications for others. The entire article must be read together to understand the intent of its first part. The interpretation must be flexible and purposive, not rigid, any reading that unduly limits competition will be rejected," the bench said.

A reference was made on August 12, 2025 to decide if judicial officers selected in subordinate judicial services after seven years practice as advocate can also apply for direct recruitment to the post of district judges only open for the experienced Bar members.

The bench also comprised of Justices M M Sundresh, Aravind Kumar, Satish Chandra Sharma and K Vinod Chandran.

A batch of petitions were filed seeking reconsideration of February 19, 2020 judgment in the case of Dheeraj Mor vs Hon’ble High Court of Delhi (2020).

A three judges bench had then held that the members of the judicial service of a State could be appointed as district judges either by way of promotion or the limited departmental competitive examination. The court had then ruled that under Article 233(2) of the Constitution, an advocate or pleader with seven years of practice could be appointed as district judge by way of direct recruitment, in case he is not already in the judicial service of the Union or a State.

The court had then also declared that the rules framed by the High Court debarring judicial officers from staking their claim as against the posts reserved for direct recruitment from Bar would not be ultra vires to the Constitution.  

The plea filed by Rejanish K V and others contended even those judicial officers who have an experience of seven years at the Bar prior to their joining as judicial officers would be entitled to be appointed as district judges via direct recruitment.  

 [Read Judgment]

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

pmla-appellate-tribunal-orders-immediate-release-of-seized-bmw-x7-in-hemant-soren-land-scam-case
Trending Crime, Police And Law
PMLA appellate tribunal orders immediate release of seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case [Read Order]

PMLA tribunal orders ED to release seized BMW X7 in Hemant Soren land scam case, citing lack of proof linking the luxury car to money laundering.

08 October, 2025 08:06 PM
offence-under-category-of-upholding-family-prestige-sc-orders-release-of-man-on-remission
Trending Judiciary
'Offence under category of upholding family prestige,' SC orders release of man on remission [Read Judgment]

SC orders immediate release of life convict who served 22 years for a murder committed to uphold family honour, citing Maharashtra remission guidelines.

08 October, 2025 08:19 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email