38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, November 04, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

SC Collegium Recommends 10 Advocates, 1 Judicial Officer For Appointment As Allahabad HC Judges [Read Resolution]

By LawStreet News Network      15 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
SC Collegium Recommends 10 Advocates, 1 Judicial Officer For Appointment As Allahabad HC Judges [Read Resolution]

The Supreme Court Collegium by a resolution dated February 12, 2019, has recommended the elevation of 10 advocates and 1 judicial officer as judges of Allahabad High Court.

The Collegium comprising of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices A.K. Sikri and S.A. Bobde after scrutinizing the material placed before them, including the observations made by the Department of Justice has recommended the following advocates:-

  1. Vipin Chandra Dixit
  2. Ramanand Pandey
  3. Shekhar Kumar Yadav
  4. Ravi Nath Tilhari
  5. Deepak Verma
  6. Gautam Chaudhary
  7. Manish Kumar
  8. Vivek Ratan Agrawal
  9. Samit Gopal
  10. Alok Kumar Yadav

The Collegium by another resolution has also recommended the elevation of judicial officer Ali Zamin, whose proposal was earlier deferred on October 31, 2018, for taking more inputs.

The Allahabad High Court collegium on February 14, 2018, had recommended the elevation of 33 advocates, out of which 17 were accepted by the Supreme Court collegium and the rest 16 names were deferred on September 25, 2018.

While making the recommendation, the Collegium taking note of the fact that net professional income of some of the recommendees is less than the prescribed minimum income limit of Rs.7 lacs has considered it appropriate to relax the income criterion to a reasonable extent in cases where such recommendees belong to categories of SC/ST/OBC or represent Government in their capacity as Standing /Panel Counsel before the Courts.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM

TOP STORIES

lawyers-to-stop-arguing-when-court-indicates-its-mind-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers to stop arguing when court indicates its mind: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Lawyers must stop arguing once court indicates its mind, stressing that harmony between Bench and Bar ensures dignified court functioning.

29 October, 2025 04:25 PM
wangchuks-detention-order-suffers-from-gross-illegality-and-arbitrariness-activists-wife-tells-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wangchuk's detention order suffers from gross illegality and arbitrariness, activist's wife tells SC

Wife of activist Sonam Wangchuk tells SC his detention under NSA suffers from illegality, citing stale FIRs, procedural lapses, and denial of fair representation.

29 October, 2025 04:35 PM
police-can-register-fir-for-threatening-witness-courts-complaint-not-needed-sc
Trending Judiciary
Police can register FIR for threatening witness; court's complaint not needed: SC [Read Judgment]

SC says police can directly file FIR for witness threats under Section 195A IPC; no court complaint needed as it’s a cognisable offence.

29 October, 2025 04:44 PM
sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email