SCBA chief writes to CJI, Law Minister for finalising MoP on appointment of judges [Read Letter]

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court Bar Association has shot off letters to Chief Justice of India B R Gavai and Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal for finalisation of the memorandum of procedure (MoP) and creating a "transparent, equitable, and merit-driven" framework for appointment of judges in constitutional courts.

On September 12, SCBA president and senior advocate Vikas Singh flagged structural flaws in the existing Collegium system, saying the delays in reform were undermining both judicial integrity and public confidence.

He said while the Collegium system was created to safeguard judicial independence, it inadvertently gave rise to serious challenges.

Singh said the Collegium routinely overlooked qualified lawyers from the Supreme Court bar for elevation to high courts in their respective states, despite their extensive exposure to national jurisprudence.

“The prevailing Collegium mechanism, while designed to preserve judicial independence, has inadvertently created significant challenges. Its structural flaws demand urgent and comprehensive correction," he contended.

Singh said it arbitrarily ignored the vast talent pool within the Supreme Court Bar for elevation to their respective home state High Courts.

"These practitioners, whose exposure to national jurisprudence should be viewed as a superior qualification, are being systematically overlooked. This not only wastes valuable judicial talent but also undermines the core principle merit-based selection,” he said.

He also flagged "troubling" under-representation of women in judiciary and referred to official data.

As of February 2024, women constituted merely 9.5% of the sanctioned strength in High Courts and a stark 2.94% in the Supreme Court, he pointed out.

"This is a glaring indictment of systemic exclusion, where the tyranny of a presumed meritocracy masks a deeper reliance on informal networks and patronage," he said.

He also highlighted the existing process focuses almost exclusively on arguing counsels while ignoring briefing lawyers and juniors, who are often the “unseen architects” of litigation.

“To elevate only the visible face is to perpetuate a flawed understanding of competence,” he wrote.

The Supreme Court, he said, had already laid down a reform blueprint for revising the MoP.

Singh stressed these directions were not merely aspirational but actionable, and any further delay in implementing them was “indefensible”.

He said permanent secretariats be set up in every High Court and in the Supreme Court to maintain data on candidates and vacancies, and to ensure institutional memory.

He also batted for transparent application-based process.

“The current informal system must be replaced with a formal process where applications are invited publicly. This ensures every deserving candidate, including those from the Supreme Court Bar, is considered on demonstrable merit through a structured mechanism,” he said.

The MoP should contain the provision to publish objective criteria, covering minimum age, years of practice, reported judgments, and pro bono work, for evaluating candidates before their elevation to higher judiciary, Singh said.

[Read Letter]

Disclaimer: This content is produced and published by LawStreet Journal Media for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. The views expressed are independent of any legal practice of the individuals involved.