38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, May 18, 2024
Legal Insiders

“We Have the Constitutional Duty to Protect Human Dignity as it is as Important as the Freedom of Speech and Expression”: Justice DY Chandrachud in Sudarshan TV Show Case

By Meghna Mishra      19 September, 2020 05:52 PM      0 Comments
“We Have the Constitutional Duty to Protect Human Dignity as it is as Important as the Freedom of Speech and Expression”: Justice DY Chandrachud in Sudarshan TV Show Case

Justice DY Chandrachud was presiding in the matter of the Sudarshan TV suit. In a recent statement, the Hon’ble Justice stated that the right to human dignity is of grave importance. It is as important as freedom of speech and expression.

The Justice made this statement as he presided over the case regarding the much-debated show “Bindas Bol” which has been creating abuzz due to its controversial content. The court also opined that the show vilified the Muslim community.

While giving his statement, Justice Chandrachud further opined that “Let the marketplace of ideas flourish in India. We know what happened during the Emergency. But we have the constitutional duty to protect human dignity and that Is as important as protecting free speech.” He has also directed the channel in the current matter to file a clear affidavit. The affidavit must indicate that the channel would take good faith efforts to protect the dignity of the community in question.

The bench, which also comprised of Justices Indu Malhotra and KM Joseph stated that the show was presented in and “inciteful manner”

Another important point highlighted by Hon’ble Justice 

Chandrachud was that any community should not be represented that stereotypically. A prejudiced representation of the Muslim community, with the repeated insistence that the community has infiltrated the bureaucracy, is dangerous and needs to be addressed.

“Representation of Muslims with a beard, skull cap and green face, with frames in the background” should be considered inciteful and hurtful to the feelings of the community.

The bench did agree that the channel has been successful in raising significant questions regarding natural security. But, this cannot be done at the cost of human dignity. Investigative journalism cannot supersede human dignity. “Whenever you refer to the Civil Services, you refer to the ISI and that is a serious concern as you show it as a conspiracy by Muslims. Of course, do your investigative journalism, but can we allow such implications being made. As judges, we are also concerned about national security. But we have to protect human dignity as well”, the Bench further opined.

Stating this, the bench highlighted that it was not their intention to restrict investigative journalism. However, the journalism cannot reflect that each member of a particular community is from a terrorist organization, just because a funding member is “not above the Board”.

The bench concluded by passing an order for the channel to file an affidavit along with chalking out a plan which would state how the channel planned to strike a balance.

Share this article:

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Fundamental right to health includes consumers' right to be made aware of quality of products: SC [Read Order]

Right to health includes consumers' right to know product quality. Advertisers must submit self-declarations for ads to ensure transparency and accountability: SC

17 May, 2024 01:43 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC asks ED to file response to Soren's plea for interim on May 20

SC asks ED to file a response by May 20 to Hemant Soren's plea for interim bail during Lok Sabha elections, with a hearing scheduled for May 21.

17 May, 2024 06:12 PM


Trending Judiciary
Indian Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [May 6 - May 10]

Get the latest updates from India's Supreme Court and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

13 May, 2024 10:29 AM
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Union govt's plea against bail to Maoist financer in case of attack on police party in Jharkhand [Read Judgment]

SC rejects govt's plea against bail for accused in Jharkhand police attack case, citing absence of violated bail conditions.

13 May, 2024 11:33 AM
Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court upholds gang rape conviction, though victim turned hostile [Read Judgment]

SC upholds gang rape conviction despite victim's hostility, affirming witness credibility in criminal trials.

13 May, 2024 12:24 PM
Trending Judiciary
Sanatana Dharma remarks SC seeks response from UP, Maha, Ktka, Bihar, J&K on Udhayanidhi's plea for clubbing FIRs

SC seeks response on Udhayanidhi's plea for clubbing FIRs related to his remarks on 'Sanatan Dharma'.

13 May, 2024 12:39 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email