38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, December 20, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES CAN WEAR WHITE-SHIRT /SAREE/KAMEEZ KURTA/SAREE FOR HEARINGS VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING

By ANJALI SHAW      15 May, 2020 02:51 PM      0 Comments
SUPREME COURT ADVOCATES Dress Code

On 13th of May 2020, a circular was passed by Sanjeev S Kalgonkar, the Secretary-General of the Apex Court, which stated as follows: As a cautionary step has been to taken to stop the spread of coronavirus infection under this difficult situations, the Competent Authority has been asked to direct that the advocates may wear plain white-shirt,/white-salwar-kameez/white saree, and with a plain white neckband during the hearing before the Apex Court of India through Virtual Court System.

Additionally, it was mentioned that this system will stay in place until the coronavirus medical emergencies exist or any until further orders.

According to the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sharad Arvind Bobde, doctors have advised that wearing gown and coats can make it easier to catch the virus and this could increase the chance of spreading the infection to others. 

The said notification was proposed on the lines of the CJIs observations. It was shared on the Supreme Court of Indias website and was also served to the secretaries of The Apex Court Bar Association and the Apex Court Advocates-on-Record Association to ensure compliance. 

In a recent instance, Chief Justice of India (CJI) and Justice Indu Malhotra and Hrishikesh Roy were not wearing their coats and gowns as they assembled for the hearing via video conferencing in the courtroom. This raised a few questions amongst the advocates, in response to this the said notification is said to have been passed.

The Supreme Courts directive on the Dress Code was largely applauded by the legal fraternity and as a result, lawyers were seen flaunting the revised dress code without coats and gowns while appearing for hearings through VC in the courtroom. 

 

 

 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM
cash-debt-exceeding-20000-does-not-invalidate-cheque-dishonour-cases-under-section-138-of-the-ni-act-sc
Trending Judiciary
Cash Debt Exceeding ₹20,000 Does Not Invalidate Cheque Dishonour Cases Under Section 138 of the NI Act: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that cash loans above ₹20,000 do not invalidate cheque dishonour cases under Section 138 of the NI Act despite I-T Act violations.

14 December, 2025 02:23 AM
sc-upholds-10-year-sentence-for-woman-in-commercial-quantity-ganja-case-rejects-pleas-based-on-sampling-irregularities
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds 10-Year Sentence for Woman in Commercial Quantity Ganja Case, Rejects Pleas Based on Sampling Irregularities [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds 10-year sentence under NDPS Act in commercial ganja case, ruling that sampling irregularities alone do not vitiate prosecution.

14 December, 2025 02:30 AM
sc-upholds-bail-in-2010-jnaneswari-express-derailment-case-issues-directions-on-speedy-trials-under-uapa
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Bail in 2010 Jnaneswari Express Derailment Case, Issues Directions on Speedy Trials Under UAPA [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds bail in the 2010 Jnaneswari Express derailment case while issuing sweeping directions to ensure speedy trials in UAPA cases.

14 December, 2025 02:39 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email