38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 08, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

SC to Consider whether a Portion of MSP can be Withheld from Farmers Who Have Committed Stubble Burning

By Meghna Mishra      08 October, 2020 02:10 PM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Stubble Burning MSP

On Tuesday, i.e. 06th October 2020, the Supreme Court took a decision wherein it said that it will probe deeper into the suggestion to withhold a portion of Minimum Support Price form farmers until unless it is made clear that they have not indulged in stubble burning.

An application filed a Vikram Tongad, a farmer that urged the Court to come up with an alternative incentive mechanism for tweaking the amount of INR 100 per quintal was heard by a bench that comprised of Honble Justices Chief Justice SA Bobde and Justices AS Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanium. The application also urged for the payment to be deferred from within the MSP until the court can verify that the stubble wasnt burnt.

CJI Bobde questioned whether the smoke emitted from the stubble burning would kill the deadly coronavirus. Senior Advocate Vikas Singh replied negatively, also adding that this can aggravate the virus. Senior Advocate Siddharth Bhatnagar also contended that he had filed an application that provided requisite directions and that continuous stubble burning will only aggravate the transmission of the coronavirus. 

Senior Advocate Shyam Divan also contented that he submitted an application that urged the court to replicate the measures that were adopted to control forest fires and stubble burning.

"For forest fire, there is already a system, by which satellite imageries are captured, and messages are sent to the concerned forest officials for remedial measures. Why can't such measures be adopted with respect to stubble burning? The second suggestion is that a portion of Minimum Support Price should be withheld to verify if the farmer has indulged in stubble burning, contended Advocate Divan

Advocate Charanpal Singh Bagri represented the farmers and actively objected to the withholding MSP for stubble burning. He also highlighted that the Apex court-ordered compensation to be granted to small and marginal farmers who refrain from stubble burning on November 5, 2019.

The case will be further heard on October 16th, 2020. 

To stop the practice of stubble burning by farmers in the neighboring states, the Court directed the governments of Haryana, Punjab, UP and Delhi to grant financial assistance of Rs 100 per quintal within seven days to small and marginal farmers for handling crop residue of non-basmati rice to ensure that they do not burn stubble to clean their fields.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

bombay-hc-rules-adopted-child-with-unknown-parentage-inherits-caste-of-adoptive-parents
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Rules Adopted Child With Unknown Parentage Inherits Caste of Adoptive Parents [Read Judgment]

Bombay High Court held that an adopted child with unknown parentage acquires the caste of adoptive parents and is entitled to caste validity.

02 February, 2026 11:11 AM
ugc-regulations-on-vice-chancellor-selection-binding-state-law-deviation-illegal-sc
Trending Judiciary
UGC Regulations on Vice-Chancellor Selection Binding; State Law Deviation Illegal: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds UGC Regulations on Vice-Chancellor selection binding, strikes down state law deviation, but allows incumbent to complete tenure under Article 142.

02 February, 2026 12:16 PM
bombay-hc-holds-section-9-cannot-be-used-to-fasten-liability-on-non-signatory-once-foreign-award-is-held-unenforceable
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Holds Section 9 Cannot Be Used to Fasten Liability on Non-Signatory Once Foreign Award Is Held Unenforceable [Read Judgment]

Bombay HC holds Section 9 cannot fasten liability on a non-signatory once a foreign arbitral award is held unenforceable against it.

02 February, 2026 12:21 PM
madras-hc-bans-construction-at-heritage-temples-across-tamil-nadu-until-heritage-commission-is-formed
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bans Construction at Heritage Temples Across Tamil Nadu Until Heritage Commission Is Formed [Read Order]

Madras High Court bans civil construction at heritage temples across Tamil Nadu until the State Heritage Commission is constituted and becomes functional.

02 February, 2026 12:38 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email