38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, February 18, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

Top 15 Landmark Judgments by Justice B.R. Gavai Ahead of His Elevation as Chief Justice of India

By Jhanak Sharma      16 April, 2025 03:52 PM      0 Comments
Top 15 Landmark Judgments by Justice BR Gavai Ahead of His Elevation as Chief Justice of India

New Delhi: As Justice Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai prepares to take oath as the 52nd Chief Justice of India on May 14, 2025, his judicial legacy is already marked by a series of impactful and high-profile decisions. From constitutional matters to political accountability and individual rights, Justice Gavai has left a strong imprint on Indian jurisprudence. Here are some of his most notable judgments:

1. Demonetisation Verdict (2023)
In Vivek Narayan Sharma v. Union of India, Justice Gavai authored the majority opinion upholding the Centre’s 2016 demonetisation scheme. The ruling emphasized that the measure was legally valid, proportionate to its objectives, and carried out with adequate consultation with the Reserve Bank of India.

2. Electoral Bonds Scheme (2024)
Justice Gavai was part of the Constitution Bench that struck down the 2018 Electoral Bonds Scheme. The Court found that the scheme infringed upon the citizens’ right to information and compromised transparency in political funding, thus violating the core tenets of electoral democracy.

3. Bulldozer Demolitions Case (2024)
In a powerful verdict reinforcing the rule of law, Justice Gavai and Justice K.V. Viswanathan held that demolishing the homes of accused individuals without due legal process was unconstitutional. The bench criticized arbitrary state action and underscored the need for procedural safeguards.

4. Article 370 Abrogation (2023)
Justice Gavai was part of the five-judge bench that unanimously upheld the abrogation of Article 370, which revoked the special status of Jammu and Kashmir. The judgment affirmed the Parliament’s authority to alter the state’s constitutional relationship with the Union.

5. Sub-classification within SC/ST Categories (2024)
In State of Punjab v. Davinder Singh, Justice Gavai concurred with the majority in allowing sub-classification within Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. This paved the way for more nuanced and targeted affirmative action policies for disadvantaged sub-groups.

6. Extension of ED Director’s Tenure (2021)
In Common Cause v. Union of India, Justice Gavai upheld the Centre’s decision to extend the tenure of the Director of the Enforcement Directorate beyond the prescribed term. He held that such an extension was legally permissible if justified by administrative need.

7. Amazon-Future Retail Arbitration (2022)
Justice Gavai played a key role in the ruling that upheld the enforceability of emergency awards issued by foreign arbitrators in India. The decision marked a significant boost for cross-border commercial arbitration and investor confidence in India’s legal framework.

8. Prashant Bhushan Contempt Case (2020)
In a highly publicized contempt case, Justice Gavai was on the bench that imposed a token fine of ₹1 on advocate Prashant Bhushan for his tweets against the judiciary. The ruling attempted to balance judicial dignity with the constitutional right to free speech.

9. Teesta Setalvad Bail Case (2023)
Justice Gavai granted bail to human rights activist Teesta Setalvad, sharply criticizing the lower court’s reasoning as “perverse.” He noted that her continued detention lacked merit and that custodial interrogation was unwarranted.

10. Rahul Gandhi Defamation Case (2023)
Justice Gavai stayed the conviction of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi in a criminal defamation case. The court found that the trial judge had failed to provide cogent reasons for awarding the maximum sentence, a move that had resulted in Gandhi’s disqualification from Parliament.

11. Upholding Circumstantial Evidence in Bribery Cases

In the landmark case of Neeraj Dutta v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), a five-judge bench, including Justice Gavai, held that a public servant can be convicted for bribery based solely on circumstantial evidence, even if the complainant turns hostile or is unavailable. This judgment reinforced the judiciary’s commitment to combating corruption, ensuring that the absence of direct evidence does not impede justice.  

12. Validity of Unstamped Arbitration Agreements

In In Re Interplay Between Arbitration Agreements Under The Arbitration And Conciliation Act 1996 And The Indian Stamp Act 1899, Justice Gavai addressed the enforceability of unstamped arbitration agreements. The court clarified that the non-payment of stamp duty does not render the arbitration agreement invalid, thereby facilitating smoother arbitration proceedings and reducing procedural hindrances.  

13. Judicial Review of High Court Appointments

In Anna Mathew v. Supreme Court of India, Justice Gavai, alongside Justice Sanjiv Khanna, examined the scope of judicial review concerning High Court judge appointments. The bench distinguished between ‘eligibility’ and ‘suitability,’ ruling that while eligibility criteria can be subject to judicial scrutiny, the assessment of a candidate’s suitability falls within the exclusive domain of the appointing authorities.  

14. Internal Reservation for Vanniyar Community

In Pattali Makkal Katchi v. Mayileruperumal, Justice Gavai was part of the bench that evaluated Tamil Nadu’s 10.5% reservation for the Vanniyar community within the Most Backward Classes quota. The court held that while the state has the authority to provide internal reservations, such measures must be based on contemporary and reliable data to ensure fairness and avoid discrimination against other communities.  

15. Upholding the Right to Shelter

In a poignant judgment addressing the demolition of properties without due process, Justice Gavai, along with Justice K.V. Viswanathan, emphasized the sanctity of the right to shelter. The court condemned arbitrary demolitions, stating that such actions violate the principles of natural justice and the rule of law. The judgment underscored that the executive cannot act as judge, jury, and executioner.  

These judgments reflect Justice Gavai’s profound commitment to upholding constitutional values, ensuring procedural fairness, and protecting individual rights. As he assumes the role of the 52nd Chief Justice of India, his jurisprudence offers insight into the principles that will guide the Supreme Court under his leadership.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations Another CBI Officer Investigating Rakesh Asthana Moves SC Against Transfer, Makes Startling Revelations

After A.K. Bassi, another CBI officer who was investigating corruption allegations against Special Director Rakesh Asthana moved the Supreme Court.

Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land Ayodhya verdict: SC rules in favour of Ram Lalla, Sunni Waqf Board gets alternate land

SC bench led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi has allotted the dispute site to Ram Janmabhoomi Nyas, while directing the government to allot an alternate 5 acre land within Ayodhya to Sunni Waqf Board to build a mosque.

Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi Supreme Court: Money Spent On Judiciary Less Than 1% In All States Except Delhi

The court guided all states to document their response to the commission's report within four weeks. If any of the states fail to file a response, it will be presumed that they have no objections to the recommendations made by the commission, the court said.

Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts Supreme Court Top Panel Names Chief Justices for Bombay, Orissa and Meghalaya High Courts

On April 18, 2020, the Supreme Court Collegium recommended new Chief Justices for three High Courts. Justice Dipankar Datta was proposed as Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court, succeeding Justice B.P. Dharmadhikari. Justice Biswanath Somadder was nominated as Chief Justice of Meghalaya High Court, while Justice Mohammad Rafiq was recommended for transfer as Chief Justice of Orissa High Court.

TRENDING NEWS

nobody-should-believe-anybody-before-marriage-sc-cautions-against-pre-marital-physical-relationships
Trending Judiciary
“Nobody Should Believe Anybody Before Marriage”: SC Cautions Against Pre-Marital Physical Relationships

Supreme Court cautions young adults on pre-marital relationships in a bail plea over rape on false promise of marriage; suggests mediation.

17 February, 2026 04:47 PM
allahabad-hc-refers-advocate-for-criminal-contempt-after-alleged-scandalous-remarks-during-bail-hearing
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refers Advocate for Criminal Contempt After Alleged Scandalous Remarks During Bail Hearing [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refers advocate for criminal contempt over alleged scandalous remarks during a bail hearing in Uttar Pradesh.

17 February, 2026 05:15 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-notifies-2026-guidelines-for-senior-advocate-designation-scraps-point-system-and-interviews
Trending Judiciary
SC Notifies 2026 Guidelines for Senior Advocate Designation; Scraps Point System and Interviews [Read Notification]

Supreme Court notifies 2026 guidelines for Senior Advocate designation, abolishing point system and interviews; introduces holistic evaluation process.

12 February, 2026 04:00 PM
sunjay-kapur-will-dispute-priya-sachdev-files-application-to-dismiss-mil-rani-kapurs-family-trust-fraud-allegations
Trending Judiciary
Sunjay Kapur Will Dispute: Priya Sachdev Files Application To Dismiss MIL Rani Kapur’s Family Trust Fraud Allegations

Delhi HC issues notice on Priya Kapur’s plea to dismiss Rani Kapur’s suit alleging a fraudulent family trust to divert late Sunjay Kapur’s estate.

12 February, 2026 04:32 PM
girlfriend-cannot-be-deemed-relative-of-husband-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Girlfriend Cannot Be Deemed ‘Relative’ of Husband: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Telangana High Court quashes case against girlfriend, holds she is not a “relative” under Section 498A IPC and cannot be charged with stalking under Section 354D.

12 February, 2026 04:46 PM
allahabad-hc-stays-section-174-a-ipc-proceedings-against-mla-abbas-ansari
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Stays Section 174-A IPC Proceedings Against MLA Abbas Ansari [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court stayed proceedings against MLA Abbas Ansari under Section 174-A IPC over alleged non-compliance with proclamation proceedings.

12 February, 2026 05:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email