38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, August 16, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

99% Advocates Vote For Virtual Hearing Of Cases, Sign Memorandum Opposing Resumption Of Physical Hearings

By Lakshya Tewari      02 September, 2020 02:32 PM      0 Comments
Virtual Hearing Of Cases

The Supreme Court of India deferring to the demands of bar association leaders has planned to start limited physical hearing of cases on a trial basis from this week, but the move appears to be fizzled out as a measly 0.87% of advocates agreed for the physical hearing of the cases whereas 99% want the virtual hearing. The medical experts have also advised a wait and watch policy before starting physical hearing due to the increase in the number of patients of COVID-19 infection in the country.

On the other hand, the judges' committee comprising Justices N V Ramana, Arun Mishra, R F Nariman, U U Lalit, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, and L N Rao had suggested opening three courtrooms for the physical hearing of cases and giving entry only to the arguing counsel. Also, there were several instances when Supreme Court Bar Association president Dushyant Dave and SC Advocate-On-Record Association president Shivaji Jadav have strongly urged along with other respected advocates of the Supreme Court, for physical hearing in the apex court in their meeting with the committee of seven judges. 

After interacting with Bar Council of India chairman Manan Kumar Mishra, Dave, and Jadhav and consulting with the topmost medical experts of India the judges' committee recommended a hybrid system that would include the opening of three courtrooms with all necessary precautions for the physical hearing of old cases and continuing virtual hearing for the new cases, but on the other hand, a large number of advocate-on-record signed a memorandum opposing start of physical hearings. Supreme Court started the virtual hearings on 25th March 2020 after the outbreak of the coronavirus.

Meanwhile, the Lucknow High Court lawyers demanded physical hearing of cases. The Lucknow Awadh Bar Association of Lucknow Bench of High Court is up in arms against the Allahabad High Court administration over allowing physical hearing of cases in Prayagraj and not permitting it for its Lucknow Bench. The decision was taken at the governing council meeting of the Awadh Bar Association on Monday. The president of the organization HGS Parihar said, At present, only virtual hearing of cases is going on at High Court in Lucknow. This system has collapsed due to poor internet connectivity. But in Allahabad High Court, physical hearing of cases is being allowed.

Parihar also said When physical hearing of cases can be allowed at Allahabad High Court why cant it be permitted in Lucknow? We have a sprawling campus where social distancing can be easily maintained. The Lucknow High Court Lawyers have complained about poor internet connectivity in the failure of virtual hearings.

On the other hand, the Patna High Court adopted a procedure to determine the physical hearing of cases. They issued notices to advocate general, associations of advocates, the bar, and lawyers to seek their view. All lawyers were of the opinion that for now the hearing should be conducted virtually. The HC will hear the matter again on 2nd September 2020.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-interfere-with-patkars-conviction-in-defamation-case
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to interfere with Patkar's conviction in defamation case

SC refuses to interfere with Medha Patkar’s conviction in 2001 defamation case filed by Delhi L-G V K Saxena, but sets aside ₹1 lakh penalty imposed on her.

11 August, 2025 02:29 PM
sc-directs-for-removing-stray-dogs-in-delhi-ncr
Trending Judiciary
SC directs for removing stray dogs in Delhi NCR

SC orders removal of all stray dogs in Delhi-NCR within 8 weeks, to be housed in shelters; warns against obstruction amid rising rabies, dog-bite cases.

11 August, 2025 06:42 PM
hc-judges-in-no-way-inferior-to-sc-judges-sc
Trending Judiciary
HC judges in no way inferior to SC judges: SC

SC affirms HC judges are equal in stature to SC judges; directs apology for unfounded allegations against Telangana HC judge.

12 August, 2025 12:14 PM
law-does-not-require-to-provide-separate-list-of-electors-not-included-in-draft-rolls
Trending Judiciary
Law does not require to provide separate list of electors not included in draft rolls, EC tells SC

EC tells SC no legal mandate to publish separate list or reasons for voters excluded from draft rolls; affected persons can file claims under Form 6.

12 August, 2025 12:33 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email