38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, September 12, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

99% Advocates Vote For Virtual Hearing Of Cases, Sign Memorandum Opposing Resumption Of Physical Hearings

By Lakshya Tewari      02 September, 2020 02:32 PM      0 Comments
Virtual Hearing Of Cases

The Supreme Court of India deferring to the demands of bar association leaders has planned to start limited physical hearing of cases on a trial basis from this week, but the move appears to be fizzled out as a measly 0.87% of advocates agreed for the physical hearing of the cases whereas 99% want the virtual hearing. The medical experts have also advised a wait and watch policy before starting physical hearing due to the increase in the number of patients of COVID-19 infection in the country.

On the other hand, the judges' committee comprising Justices N V Ramana, Arun Mishra, R F Nariman, U U Lalit, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, and L N Rao had suggested opening three courtrooms for the physical hearing of cases and giving entry only to the arguing counsel. Also, there were several instances when Supreme Court Bar Association president Dushyant Dave and SC Advocate-On-Record Association president Shivaji Jadav have strongly urged along with other respected advocates of the Supreme Court, for physical hearing in the apex court in their meeting with the committee of seven judges. 

After interacting with Bar Council of India chairman Manan Kumar Mishra, Dave, and Jadhav and consulting with the topmost medical experts of India the judges' committee recommended a hybrid system that would include the opening of three courtrooms with all necessary precautions for the physical hearing of old cases and continuing virtual hearing for the new cases, but on the other hand, a large number of advocate-on-record signed a memorandum opposing start of physical hearings. Supreme Court started the virtual hearings on 25th March 2020 after the outbreak of the coronavirus.

Meanwhile, the Lucknow High Court lawyers demanded physical hearing of cases. The Lucknow Awadh Bar Association of Lucknow Bench of High Court is up in arms against the Allahabad High Court administration over allowing physical hearing of cases in Prayagraj and not permitting it for its Lucknow Bench. The decision was taken at the governing council meeting of the Awadh Bar Association on Monday. The president of the organization HGS Parihar said, At present, only virtual hearing of cases is going on at High Court in Lucknow. This system has collapsed due to poor internet connectivity. But in Allahabad High Court, physical hearing of cases is being allowed.

Parihar also said When physical hearing of cases can be allowed at Allahabad High Court why cant it be permitted in Lucknow? We have a sprawling campus where social distancing can be easily maintained. The Lucknow High Court Lawyers have complained about poor internet connectivity in the failure of virtual hearings.

On the other hand, the Patna High Court adopted a procedure to determine the physical hearing of cases. They issued notices to advocate general, associations of advocates, the bar, and lawyers to seek their view. All lawyers were of the opinion that for now the hearing should be conducted virtually. The HC will hear the matter again on 2nd September 2020.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-disapproves-kerala-hc-directly-entertaining-pre-arrest-bails
Trending Judiciary
SC disapproves Kerala HC directly entertaining pre arrest bails [Read Order]

SC slams Kerala HC practice of directly entertaining anticipatory bail pleas, says litigants must first approach Sessions Court unless in exceptional cases.

11 September, 2025 01:58 PM
sc-quashes-cheque-dishonour-complaint-filed-5-days-late-rules-30-day-limit-under-ni-act-is-mandatory
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes Cheque Dishonour Complaint Filed 5 Days Late, Rules 30-Day Limit Under NI Act is Mandatory [Read Order]

SC quashes cheque dishonour complaint filed 5 days late, rules 30-day limit under NI Act is mandatory and delay needs proper condonation process.

11 September, 2025 02:32 PM

TOP STORIES

wife-living-in-adultery-not-entitled-to-maintenance-rules-delhi-court
Trending Judiciary
Wife Living In Adultery Not Entitled To Maintenance, Rules Delhi Court

Delhi court denies maintenance to woman under Section 125 CrPC, ruling that a wife proven to be living in adultery is disqualified from claiming support.

06 September, 2025 06:32 PM
sc-dissolves-marriage-faced-deadlock-over-1951-model-antique-hand-made-classic-rolls-royce-car
Trending Judiciary
SC dissolves marriage faced deadlock over 1951 model antique hand-made classic Rolls Royce car [Read Order]

SC dissolves marriage invoking Article 142 after dispute over 1951 Rolls Royce; man agrees to pay ₹2.25 cr in mediated settlement.

06 September, 2025 06:44 PM
sc-notice-to-ed-on-plea-by-journalist-in-money-laundering-case
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to ED on plea by journalist in money laundering case

SC issues notice to Gujarat govt & ED on plea of ex-‘The Hindu’ journalist Mahesh Langa seeking bail in money laundering case linked to alleged fraud.

08 September, 2025 02:37 PM
absence-of-cheque-bank-transfer-or-receipt-wont-always-negate-cash-transaction-sc
Trending Judiciary
Absence of cheque, bank transfer or receipt won't always negate cash transaction: SC [Read Order]

Absence of cheque, transfer or receipt doesn’t negate cash deal; promissory note & oral statement can establish enforceable debt: SC

08 September, 2025 02:43 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email