38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, April 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legal Insiders

99% Advocates Vote For Virtual Hearing Of Cases, Sign Memorandum Opposing Resumption Of Physical Hearings

By Lakshya Tewari      02 September, 2020 02:32 PM      0 Comments
Virtual Hearing Of Cases

The Supreme Court of India deferring to the demands of bar association leaders has planned to start limited physical hearing of cases on a trial basis from this week, but the move appears to be fizzled out as a measly 0.87% of advocates agreed for the physical hearing of the cases whereas 99% want the virtual hearing. The medical experts have also advised a wait and watch policy before starting physical hearing due to the increase in the number of patients of COVID-19 infection in the country.

On the other hand, the judges' committee comprising Justices N V Ramana, Arun Mishra, R F Nariman, U U Lalit, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, and L N Rao had suggested opening three courtrooms for the physical hearing of cases and giving entry only to the arguing counsel. Also, there were several instances when Supreme Court Bar Association president Dushyant Dave and SC Advocate-On-Record Association president Shivaji Jadav have strongly urged along with other respected advocates of the Supreme Court, for physical hearing in the apex court in their meeting with the committee of seven judges. 

After interacting with Bar Council of India chairman Manan Kumar Mishra, Dave, and Jadhav and consulting with the topmost medical experts of India the judges' committee recommended a hybrid system that would include the opening of three courtrooms with all necessary precautions for the physical hearing of old cases and continuing virtual hearing for the new cases, but on the other hand, a large number of advocate-on-record signed a memorandum opposing start of physical hearings. Supreme Court started the virtual hearings on 25th March 2020 after the outbreak of the coronavirus.

Meanwhile, the Lucknow High Court lawyers demanded physical hearing of cases. The Lucknow Awadh Bar Association of Lucknow Bench of High Court is up in arms against the Allahabad High Court administration over allowing physical hearing of cases in Prayagraj and not permitting it for its Lucknow Bench. The decision was taken at the governing council meeting of the Awadh Bar Association on Monday. The president of the organization HGS Parihar said, At present, only virtual hearing of cases is going on at High Court in Lucknow. This system has collapsed due to poor internet connectivity. But in Allahabad High Court, physical hearing of cases is being allowed.

Parihar also said When physical hearing of cases can be allowed at Allahabad High Court why cant it be permitted in Lucknow? We have a sprawling campus where social distancing can be easily maintained. The Lucknow High Court Lawyers have complained about poor internet connectivity in the failure of virtual hearings.

On the other hand, the Patna High Court adopted a procedure to determine the physical hearing of cases. They issued notices to advocate general, associations of advocates, the bar, and lawyers to seek their view. All lawyers were of the opinion that for now the hearing should be conducted virtually. The HC will hear the matter again on 2nd September 2020.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-upholds-rajasthan-dairy-co-operative-bye-laws-rules-minimum-milk-supply-norms-as-valid-eligibility-criteria
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Rajasthan Dairy Co-operative Bye-Laws, Rules Minimum Milk Supply Norms as Valid Eligibility Criteria [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds Rajasthan dairy co-operative bye-laws, rules minimum milk supply norms as valid eligibility criteria, sets aside High Court order.

11 April, 2026 11:02 AM
partnership-cannot-be-used-as-a-cloak-to-conceal-unlawful-sub-letting-courts-can-lift-the-veil-sc
Trending Judiciary
Partnership Cannot Be Used as a Cloak to Conceal Unlawful Sub-Letting; Courts Can Lift the Veil: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules partnership cannot mask illegal sub-letting; courts may lift the veil and restore eviction orders against unlawful tenants.

11 April, 2026 04:39 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-refuses-stay-on-adanis-jal-plan-nclat-to-hear-vedanta-appeal
Trending Business
SC Refuses Stay on Adani’s JAL Plan; NCLAT to Hear Vedanta Appeal

Supreme Court refuses to stay Adani’s JAL resolution plan, asks NCLAT to hear Vedanta’s appeal on priority in the high-stakes insolvency dispute.

06 April, 2026 01:31 PM
sc-orders-cbi-probe-into-alleged-irregular-allotment-of-contracts-linked-to-arunachal-pradesh-cm-pema-khandus-family
Trending Judiciary
SC Orders CBI Probe into Alleged Irregular Allotment of Contracts Linked to Arunachal Pradesh CM Pema Khandu’s Family

Supreme Court orders CBI probe into alleged irregular allotment of public works contracts linked to Arunachal CM Pema Khandu’s family.

06 April, 2026 02:39 PM
ed-to-probe-assets-of-self-styled-godman-ashok-kharat
Trending Crime, Police And Law
ED to Probe Assets of Self-Styled Godman Ashok Kharat

ED probes Ashok Kharat’s assets under PMLA as Maharashtra launches dual inquiry into fraud allegations and illegal CDR leak linked to Eknath Shinde.

06 April, 2026 02:53 PM
innocent-man-framed-in-false-rape-case-delhi-hc-upholds-conviction-of-lawyer-si-enhances-compensation-to-3-lakh
Trending Judiciary
Innocent Man Framed in False Rape Case: Delhi HC Upholds Conviction of Lawyer, SI; Enhances Compensation to ₹3 Lakh [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds conviction of lawyer, SI in false rape case; orders ₹3 lakh compensation to innocent man’s family for wrongful implication.

06 April, 2026 04:30 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email