38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, October 11, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legislative Corner

Rs 50 Lakh Fine, 5 Years Jail For Celebs Endorsing False Ads Under New Consumer Protection Bill [Read Bill]

By LawStreet News Network      08 August, 2019 02:08 PM      0 Comments
Rs 50 Lakh Fine, 5 Years Jail For Celebs Endorsing False Ads Under New Consumer Protection Bill [Read Bill]

The new Consumer Protection Bill, 2019, passed by the Rajya Sabha on August 6, 2019, proposes stiff penalties for manufacturers and celebrities endorsing a false or misleading advertisement.

The Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on July 30, 2019, after it was tabled by Union Food and Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan.

Introducing the Bill which will replace the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Paswan said that a new law for strengthening consumer rights was necessary in view of the modern day challenges.

Under the Bill, the central government will set up a Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) to protect, promote and enforce consumer rights. The CCPA will have an investigation wing headed by a Director General to inquire into violations of consumer rights and for imposing penalties. The authority also has the power to initiate class action, and enforcing refund and return of products.

The CCPA can impose a fine of up to Rs 10 lakh on celebrity endorsers or manufacturers for a false or misleading advertisement. The authority can also order imprisonment of up to two years for false advertising. In case of a repeat offence, the authority can impose a penalty of up to Rs 50 lakh and a jail term of up to five years.

Moreover, CCPA can also prohibit the endorsers of a misleading advertisement from endorsing that particular product or service for a period of up to one year, extending up to three years for repeat offenders. Only in cases where the endorser can prove that they have done due diligence to verify claims made in the ads, will they be exempted from punishment.

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions (CDRCs) will be set up at the district, state and national levels to address consumer grievances. A consumer can approach the CDRC to file a complaint with respect to i) defective goods or services; ii) overcharging; iii) unfair trade practices; and iv) sale of goods or services which may be hazardous. The final appeal for all disputes will lie with the Supreme Court.

The District CDRC will listen to complaints for all goods and services where the value does not exceed Rs one crore. The State CDRC will entertain complaints where the value is more than Rs one crore and up to Rs 10 crore, while complaints for goods and services valued at over Rs 10 crore will be heard by the National CDRC.

The clause relating to product liability holds the manufacturer, service provider or seller responsible for any harm or injury suffered by a consumer due to a defective product or deficient service. In order to claim compensation, a consumer will have to prove any one of the conditions for defect or deficiency, as set out in the Bill.

(With inputs from PRS)

[Read Bill]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-seeks-centre-ecs-response-on-pil-for-voting-rights-to-undertrial-prisoners
Trending Judiciary
SC seeks Centre, EC's response on PIL for voting rights to undertrial prisoners

SC seeks Centre and EC’s reply on plea seeking voting rights for 4.5 lakh undertrial prisoners; petitioner says blanket ban under RPA violates constitutional norms.

10 October, 2025 02:17 PM
sex-education-must-be-from-younger-age-not-from-class-ix-sc
Trending Judiciary
Sex education must be from younger age, not from class IX: SC [Read Order]

SC stresses that sex education must begin at a younger age, not from Class IX, and be included in the school curriculum to guide children through puberty.

10 October, 2025 02:37 PM

TOP STORIES

allahabad-hc-refuses-interim-protection-to-sambhal-mosque-asks-petitioners-to-approach-appellate-court
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Refuses Interim Protection to Sambhal Mosque, Asks Petitioners to Approach Appellate Court [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court refused interim protection to Sambhal mosque, directing petitioners to seek remedy before the appellate court under UP Revenue Code.

06 October, 2025 04:48 PM
calling-off-marriage-after-courtship-not-a-crime-or-breach-of-promise-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Calling Off Marriage After Courtship Not A Crime Or Breach Of Promise: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi High Court grants bail, ruling that ending marriage plans after courtship is not a breach of promise or offence under false promise to marry.

06 October, 2025 05:03 PM
celebrating-bail-on-social-media-not-ground-for-cancellation-without-specific-threat-to-complainant-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
Celebrating Bail On Social Media Not Ground For Cancellation Without Specific Threat To Complainant: Delhi HC [Read Order]

Delhi HC rules that celebrating bail on social media isn’t grounds for cancellation unless a specific threat or intimidation is proven.

06 October, 2025 05:25 PM
woman-cannot-claim-maintenance-after-securing-rape-conviction-against-live-in-partner-jammu-and-kashmir-hc
Trending Judiciary
Woman Cannot Claim Maintenance After Securing Rape Conviction Against Live-In Partner: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]

J&K High Court held that a woman who secured a rape conviction against her live-in partner cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC.

06 October, 2025 06:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email