38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, May 02, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legislative Corner

Rs 50 Lakh Fine, 5 Years Jail For Celebs Endorsing False Ads Under New Consumer Protection Bill [Read Bill]

By LawStreet News Network      08 August, 2019 02:08 PM      0 Comments
Rs 50 Lakh Fine, 5 Years Jail For Celebs Endorsing False Ads Under New Consumer Protection Bill [Read Bill]

The new Consumer Protection Bill, 2019, passed by the Rajya Sabha on August 6, 2019, proposes stiff penalties for manufacturers and celebrities endorsing a false or misleading advertisement.

The Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on July 30, 2019, after it was tabled by Union Food and Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan.

Introducing the Bill which will replace the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Paswan said that a new law for strengthening consumer rights was necessary in view of the modern day challenges.

Under the Bill, the central government will set up a Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) to protect, promote and enforce consumer rights. The CCPA will have an investigation wing headed by a Director General to inquire into violations of consumer rights and for imposing penalties. The authority also has the power to initiate class action, and enforcing refund and return of products.

The CCPA can impose a fine of up to Rs 10 lakh on celebrity endorsers or manufacturers for a false or misleading advertisement. The authority can also order imprisonment of up to two years for false advertising. In case of a repeat offence, the authority can impose a penalty of up to Rs 50 lakh and a jail term of up to five years.

Moreover, CCPA can also prohibit the endorsers of a misleading advertisement from endorsing that particular product or service for a period of up to one year, extending up to three years for repeat offenders. Only in cases where the endorser can prove that they have done due diligence to verify claims made in the ads, will they be exempted from punishment.

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions (CDRCs) will be set up at the district, state and national levels to address consumer grievances. A consumer can approach the CDRC to file a complaint with respect to i) defective goods or services; ii) overcharging; iii) unfair trade practices; and iv) sale of goods or services which may be hazardous. The final appeal for all disputes will lie with the Supreme Court.

The District CDRC will listen to complaints for all goods and services where the value does not exceed Rs one crore. The State CDRC will entertain complaints where the value is more than Rs one crore and up to Rs 10 crore, while complaints for goods and services valued at over Rs 10 crore will be heard by the National CDRC.

The clause relating to product liability holds the manufacturer, service provider or seller responsible for any harm or injury suffered by a consumer due to a defective product or deficient service. In order to claim compensation, a consumer will have to prove any one of the conditions for defect or deficiency, as set out in the Bill.

(With inputs from PRS)

[Read Bill]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

sc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-brutal-stabbing-of-woman-advocate-missing-children-hospital-refusal-under-scanner
Trending Judiciary
SC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Brutal Stabbing of Woman Advocate; Missing Children, Hospital Refusal Under Scanner

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of Delhi lawyer stabbing case, orders probe into hospital denial and directs police to trace two missing children.

27 April, 2026 04:56 PM
west-bengal-elections-calcutta-hc-expands-motorcycle-restrictions-bars-group-riding
Trending Judiciary
West Bengal Elections Calcutta HC Expands Motorcycle Restrictions, Bars Group Riding [Read Order]

Calcutta High Court bars group motorcycle riding from two days before West Bengal polling, modifying Single Judge order on CEO’s appeal.

28 April, 2026 05:10 PM
mere-absence-of-results-in-hair-treatment-cannot-prove-medical-negligence-or-deficiency-in-service-ncdrc-sets-aside-orders-against-dermatologist-plastic-surgeon-and-lifecell-international
Trending Judiciary
Mere Absence of Results in Hair Treatment Cannot Prove Medical Negligence or Deficiency in Service: NCDRC Sets Aside Orders Against Dermatologist, Plastic Surgeon, and Lifecell International [Read Order]

NCDRC rules that failure of PRP hair treatment alone does not prove negligence, sets aside compensation orders against doctors and Lifecell International.

28 April, 2026 05:51 PM
sc-upholds-translocation-of-deer-from-hauz-khas-deer-park-to-rajasthan-tiger-reserves-directs-moefcc-to-grant-statutory-status-to-cec-wildlife-translocation-guidelines
Trending Judiciary
SC Upholds Translocation of Deer from Hauz Khas Deer Park to Rajasthan Tiger Reserves; Directs MoEFCC to Grant Statutory Status to CEC Wildlife Translocation Guidelines [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds deer translocation from Hauz Khas to Rajasthan reserves; directs MoEFCC to grant statutory status to CEC guidelines.

28 April, 2026 05:57 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email