38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 25, 2024
Breaking News
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Legislative Corner

Rs 50 Lakh Fine, 5 Years Jail For Celebs Endorsing False Ads Under New Consumer Protection Bill [Read Bill]

By LawStreet News Network      08 August, 2019 02:08 PM      0 Comments
Rs 50 Lakh Fine, 5 Years Jail For Celebs Endorsing False Ads Under New Consumer Protection Bill [Read Bill]

The new Consumer Protection Bill, 2019, passed by the Rajya Sabha on August 6, 2019, proposes stiff penalties for manufacturers and celebrities endorsing a false or misleading advertisement.

The Bill was passed by the Lok Sabha on July 30, 2019, after it was tabled by Union Food and Consumer Affairs Minister Ram Vilas Paswan.

Introducing the Bill which will replace the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Paswan said that a new law for strengthening consumer rights was necessary in view of the modern day challenges.

Under the Bill, the central government will set up a Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) to protect, promote and enforce consumer rights. The CCPA will have an investigation wing headed by a Director General to inquire into violations of consumer rights and for imposing penalties. The authority also has the power to initiate class action, and enforcing refund and return of products.

The CCPA can impose a fine of up to Rs 10 lakh on celebrity endorsers or manufacturers for a false or misleading advertisement. The authority can also order imprisonment of up to two years for false advertising. In case of a repeat offence, the authority can impose a penalty of up to Rs 50 lakh and a jail term of up to five years.

Moreover, CCPA can also prohibit the endorsers of a misleading advertisement from endorsing that particular product or service for a period of up to one year, extending up to three years for repeat offenders. Only in cases where the endorser can prove that they have done due diligence to verify claims made in the ads, will they be exempted from punishment.

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions (CDRCs) will be set up at the district, state and national levels to address consumer grievances. A consumer can approach the CDRC to file a complaint with respect to i) defective goods or services; ii) overcharging; iii) unfair trade practices; and iv) sale of goods or services which may be hazardous. The final appeal for all disputes will lie with the Supreme Court.

The District CDRC will listen to complaints for all goods and services where the value does not exceed Rs one crore. The State CDRC will entertain complaints where the value is more than Rs one crore and up to Rs 10 crore, while complaints for goods and services valued at over Rs 10 crore will be heard by the National CDRC.

The clause relating to product liability holds the manufacturer, service provider or seller responsible for any harm or injury suffered by a consumer due to a defective product or deficient service. In order to claim compensation, a consumer will have to prove any one of the conditions for defect or deficiency, as set out in the Bill.

(With inputs from PRS)

[Read Bill]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

cheque-issued-for-bribe-payment-not-enforceable-under-ni-act-punjab-and-haryana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Cheque issued for bribe payment not enforceable under NI Act: Punjab and Haryana HC [Read Order]

The Punjab and Haryana High Court ruled that bribe payments do not constitute legally enforceable liabilities under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

24 October, 2024 10:56 AM
pune-porsche-accident-bombay-hc-rejects-anticipatory-bail-over-alleged-evidence-tampering-involving-3-lakh-bribe
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Accident: Bombay HC rejects anticipatory bail over alleged evidence tampering involving ₹3 lakh bribe [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rejects anticipatory bail in Pune Porsche accident case, citing serious evidence tampering and bribery allegations against the accused’s father.

24 October, 2024 11:07 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-dismisses-plea-for-direction-to-set-up-regulatory-board-to-monitor-and-manage-ott-platforms
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses plea for direction to set up regulatory board to monitor & manage OTT platforms

SC dismisses plea to set up a regulatory board for OTT platforms, stating the issue falls under policy matters, not for the court to intervene.

19 October, 2024 06:22 PM
a-judges-praise-of-politician-may-affect-publics-trust-in-judiciary-sc-judge-b-r-gavai
Trending Judiciary
A judge's praise of politician may affect public's trust in judiciary: SC judge B R Gavai

SC Judge B R Gavai cautions that judges praising politicians and resigning to contest elections may erode public trust and compromise judicial impartiality.

21 October, 2024 01:34 PM
complainant-cant-insist-on-deciding-plea-to-summon-other-accused-before-cross-examination-sc
Trending Judiciary
Complainant can't insist on deciding plea to summon other accused before cross examination: SC [Read Judgment]

SC rules complainant can’t delay cross-examination to summon others as accused; trial court has discretion on timing under Section 319 CrPC.

21 October, 2024 01:36 PM
sc-dismisses-kejriwals-plea-against-summons-in-defamation-case-on-remarks-on-pms-academic-degree
Trending Judiciary
SC dismisses Kejriwal's plea against summons in defamation case on remarks on PM's academic degree

SC dismisses Kejriwal’s plea challenging summons in defamation case over remarks on PM Modi’s degree, upholding Gujarat University’s complaint.

21 October, 2024 05:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email