38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
News Updates

Kashmiri Pandit Organisation Support Dilution of Article 370, Cite Lack of Faith in Indian Constitution

By Harshvardhan Sharma      28 July, 2023 09:02 PM      0 Comments
Kashmiri Pandit Organisation Support Dilution of Article 370, Cite Lack of Faith in Indian Constitution

NEW DELHI: A Kashmiri pandit organization, Youth 4 Panun Kashmir, on Thursday filed a plea in the Supreme Court supporting the Centres 2019 decision on dilution of Article 370 of the Constitution, contending majority of people in the valley never had faith in the Indian Constitution.

The plea claimed Article 370 and Article 35A of the Constitution became a major reason for eroding the sentiment of Indian identity within the Kashmir Valley.

"The majority of Kashmir valley never had faith in the Indian Constitution and Article 370 and Article 35A of the Indian Constitution helped them in the separatist movement," it said.

The plea filed through advocate Siddharth Praveen Acharya sought dismissal of all petitions challenging the vires of the abrogation of Article 370 and Article 35A of the Constitution of India and Jammu and Kashmir Re-Organization Act, 2019 and declare the decisions as valid and constitutional.

The petitioner stated that they strongly felt that Article 370 and Article 35A were the biggest reason for the lack of psychological integration of the erstwhile State of Jammu & Kashmir with the rest of India and became a breeding ground for separatist ideas leading to the ethnic cleansing of innocent Kashmiri Pandits.

The plea also asked the top court to recognise the atrocities committed against Kashmiri Pandits and the inaction of the central and state governments in this matter.

The petitioner sought to be heard when a five-judge bench led by Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud begins hearing a batch of petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370, which gave special status to Jammu and Kashmir, from August 2.

The plea seeks the dismissal of all petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370 and the declaration of the step as valid and constitutional.

The application also seeks to draw the attention of the Supreme Court to the violence and atrocities perpetrated upon Kashmiri Pandit Community between the period of 1989-1991 as a direct or indirect consequence of unimpeded powers provided to the Jammu & Kashmir State Government vide Article 370 of the Constitution.

The plea also wants the apex court to take on record the trials and tribulations faced by the Kashmiri Pandit Community in Jammu & Kashmir and the exodus thereof as a matter of history.

The plea highlighted that Article 370 and Article 35A of the Indian Constitution were complex problems with implications for history, the Constitution, politics, society, economy, psychology and the human conditions.

"The erstwhile State of Jammu and Kashmir had become vulnerable to both external aggression and internal rebellion, and Article 370 and Article 35A had significantly contributed to the hostile elements' ability to sow internal unrest and facilitate external aggression," it said.

It also stated that the special status for Jammu and Kashmir by virtue of Article 370 and Article 35A of the Indian Constitution led to ambiguity and complexities in the interpretation and application of certain laws and rights within the region. "This ambiguity undermines the clarity and certainty that the basic structure doctrine seeks to achieve in the Constitution. A constitutionally protected sub-nation poses challenges to the uniformity and consistency of the constitutional framework," it said.

The plea also stated the provision, by establishing a safeguarded entity within the constitutional framework, resulted into erosion of sovereignty, inequality among States, threat to national integration, among others.



Share this article:

About:

Advocate Harshvardhan Sharma, founder and Editor-in-Chief of LawStreet Journal, is an award-winning ...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email