38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 22, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Political NEWS

Can Asaduddin Owaisi lose his Parliamentary Membership over Palestine Slogan?

By Aditya Sharma      27 June, 2024 05:32 PM      0 Comments
Can Asaduddin Owaisi lose his Parliamentary Membership over Palestine Slogan

New Delhi: Famous for his quirky dialogues, AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi sparked yet another controversy on Tuesday while taking the oath as the 18th Lok Sabha member. Owaisi was at the podium swearing in his Lower House membership when he concluded his speech by saying, Jai Bheem, Jai Meem, Jai Telangana, Jai Palestine.

Following widespread buzz around this slogan, Supreme Court Lawyer Vishnu Shankar Jain informed late Tuesday night that a formal complaint has been registered against the AIMIM MP.

In a post on social media (formerly Twitter), Jain wrote, A complaint has been filed before the President of India against Mr. Asaduddin Owaisi in terms of Articles 102 of the Constitution of India by Mr. Hari Shankar Jain, seeking his disqualification as a member of parliament.

Also Watch: LawStreet Journal report

Its important to note what Article 102 of the Constitution says. It discusses the disqualification criteria for being chosen as, and for being, a member of either House of Parliament. Clause D of Article 102 specifies that a member can be disqualified if there is any acknowledgement of allegiance or adherence to a foreign State.

Regarding past incidents of Parliamentarians suspensions, it is not new as the process of suspension is a part of Parliamentary procedures. A few months ago, news headlines covered the suspension of 141 members, which was the highest in history. However, no one has been suspended to date on the grounds of foreign allegiance. If Owaisi were to be suspended, he would be the first Member of the House to face suspension on these grounds.

While suspensions of Parliamentarians are not uncommon, they have historically been based on other grounds within Parliamentary procedures, such as unruly behavior or breach of decorum. The case of disqualification based on foreign allegiance, as raised against Owaisi, represents a potentially precedent-setting situation. It remains to be seen how this complaint will be adjudicated and whether it will lead to Owaisis suspension, setting a new milestone in Parliamentary proceedings regarding disqualification criteria.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Plea filed in SC by Hindu Sena for FIRs against Owaisi & others for hate speeches Plea filed in SC by Hindu Sena for FIRs against Owaisi & others for hate speeches

Hindu Sena seeks SC directive for FIRs against leaders like Owaisi for alleged hate speeches against 'Sanatan Dharma' and Hindu shrines.

CAA rules have unholy nexus with NRC; to act as incentives for Muslims to change faith for citizenship, Owaisi tells SC CAA rules have unholy nexus with NRC; to act as incentives for Muslims to change faith for citizenship, Owaisi tells SC

AIMIM's Asaduddin Owaisi challenges India's CAA in Supreme Court, claiming it incentivizes religious conversion for citizenship and discriminates against Muslims.

Can Asaduddin Owaisi lose his Parliamentary Membership over Palestine Slogan? Can Asaduddin Owaisi lose his Parliamentary Membership over Palestine Slogan?

Controversy surrounds Asaduddin Owaisi's parliamentary membership over Jai Palestine slogan. Legal implications and historical context explained.

SC to hear Owaisi's plea on Places of Worship Act SC to hear Owaisi's plea on Places of Worship Act

SC to hear Asaduddin Owaisi’s plea seeking implementation of the Places of Worship Act, 1991, tagged with pending cases. Hearing set for February 17.

TRENDING NEWS

us-sc-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-rules-ieepa-does-not-authorize-president-to-impose-duties
Trending International
US SC Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs, Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize President to Impose Duties [Read Order]

US Supreme Court strikes down Trump’s global tariffs, ruling that IEEPA does not authorize the President to impose import duties.

21 February, 2026 02:45 PM
kerala-hc-issues-notice-to-cbfc-over-certification-of-the-kerala-story-2-goes-beyond
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Issues Notice to CBFC Over Certification of ‘The Kerala Story 2 – Goes Beyond’

Kerala High Court issues notice to CBFC over certification of The Kerala Story 2, questions safeguards under Cinematograph Act; release not stayed.

21 February, 2026 02:50 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email