38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, May 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Speak Legal

An Insight: Can A Curative Petition Save The Nirbhaya Convicts From The Facing Death?

By LawStreet News Network      09 January, 2020 06:01 PM      0 Comments
An Insight: Can A Curative Petition Save The Nirbhaya Convicts From The Facing Death?

Recently, the Patiala house court issued death warrants to hang the four convicts in the 2012 Nirbhaya rape-murder case namely - Mukesh Singh, Pawan Gupta, Vinay Sharma and Akshay Singh. The date of hanging is on January 22, 2020 at 7 a.m. 

All four were found guilty of rape, murder, unnatural offences and destruction of evidence and the Delhi high court confirmed their death sentence. On May 5, 2017, the Supreme Court rejected their appeal and upheld the death sentence.

The review petitions filed by the convicts were dismissed by the Supreme Court. One of the four convicts, Vinay Sharma, had filed a mercy petition before the President of India.

What is a curative petition?

A second review of the judgment of the Supreme Court is granted through a curative petition.

It was first introduced in the case of Rupa Ashok Hurra v. Ashok Hurra, and it was held that in order to rectify gross miscarriage of justice in its final judgment, the court will allow the curative petition filed by the victim.

Specific requirements for the Court to entertain a curative petition:

A curative petition is not meant for automatic grant of ones right to a second review. There must be the following conditions:

  • The Court should have re-stated that the parties are prevented from challenging the final decision.
  • The petitioner must prove that principles of natural justice have been violated or the judges who heard the case were biased.
  • The Petition must be carried along with a certificate from a senior advocate.

Provisions for filing a mercy petition:

According to Article 72 of the Indian Constitution, the president has the power to grant pardons, reprieves, respites or remissions of punishment or to suspend, remit or commute the sentence of any person convicted of any offence where punishment or sentence is:

  • given by a court martial;
  • under a law relating to a matter to which the executive power of the Union extends;
  • a death sentence.

A pardon completely absolves the offender from all sentences or punishments or disqualifications and places him in the same position as if he had never committed the offence.

Procedure to file a mercy petition: 

A convict who is given a death sentence and whose appeal to the Supreme Court to review its judgment has been dismissed has the option to file a mercy petition to the president within seven days from the date on which the superintendent of jail issues a notice to do so.

The president, after consulting the cabinet, decides the matter. It is subjected to judicial review, that is, a convict can challenge the dismissal of a mercy petition by the president either in the high court or in the Supreme Court. If the Nirbhaya convicts challenge it first in the high court, then they will have an appellate remedy in the Supreme Court.

It is interesting to note that, even though it is highly unlikely that any of the convicts in the Nirbhaya rape and murder case will be absolved of all criminal charges, what is possible though is some more delay in the hanging of the convicts which is scheduled for January 22, 2020. The case has already become synonymous with failure of the justice delivery system since it has been more than seven years since the rape and murder of Nirbhaya in Delhi in December, 2012. 

Author: Swetalana Rout



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-offence-under-sc-st-act-if-alleged-casteist-abuse-occurred-inside-private-house-sc
Trending Judiciary
No Offence Under SC/ST Act If Alleged Casteist Abuse Occurred Inside Private House: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules SC/ST Act offence is not made out if alleged casteist abuse occurred inside a private house without public view.

14 May, 2026 03:16 PM
madras-hc-bars-tiruppattur-mla-from-floor-test-over-disputed-one-vote-victory
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Bars Tiruppattur MLA From Floor Test Over Disputed One-Vote Victory [Read Order]

Madras High Court restrains Tiruppattur MLA from floor test participation over disputed one-vote victory and alleged electoral irregularities.

14 May, 2026 03:24 PM

TOP STORIES

delhi-hc-refers-to-larger-bench-issue-on-stage-of-hearing-accused-under-section-223-bnss-before-cognizance
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Refers to Larger Bench Issue on Stage of Hearing Accused Under Section 223 BNSS Before Cognizance [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court refers to Larger Bench issue on when accused must be heard under Section 223 BNSS before taking cognizance.

09 May, 2026 10:25 AM
hymen-intact-does-not-mean-no-penetration-delhi-high-court-upholds-pocso-conviction-of-tenant-who-raped-six-year-old-girl
Trending Judiciary
‘Hymen Intact Does Not Mean No Penetration’: Delhi High Court Upholds POCSO Conviction of Tenant Who Raped Six-Year-Old Girl [Read Order]

Delhi High Court upheld a tenant’s POCSO conviction for raping a six-year-old girl, holding that an intact hymen does not negate penetration.

09 May, 2026 12:42 PM
consumer-commission-directs-bus-operator-to-pay-50000-compensation-after-barat-reaches-wedding-destination-at-3-am-due-to-breakdown
Trending Judiciary
Consumer Commission Directs Bus Operator to Pay ₹50,000 Compensation After Barat Reaches Wedding Destination at 3 AM Due to Breakdown [Read Order]

Delhi Consumer Commission ordered a bus operator to pay ₹50,000 compensation after a Barat reached the wedding venue at 3 AM due to breakdown.

09 May, 2026 01:56 PM
sabarimala-reference-day-13-can-faith-justify-civil-death-and-genital-cutting-of-children-sc-bench-examines-religions-reach-over-the-body
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Reference Day 13: “Can Faith Justify Civil Death and Genital Cutting of Children?”: SC Bench Examines Religion’s Reach Over the Body

SC’s nine-judge bench examined whether religious practices violating dignity, bodily autonomy and conscience can claim protection under Article 26.

09 May, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email