38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, February 15, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Speak Legal

[EYE WITNESS] Firoz Bakht Ahmed becomes the eyewitness to confirm No anti-Muslim slogans raised during the 2-hour historic event at Jantar Mantar

By Vivek Kumar      10 August, 2021 01:41 PM      0 Comments
Firoz Bakht Ahmed Ashwini Upadhyay Jantar Mantar

Firoz Bakht Ahmed, Chancellor of Maulana Azad National Urdu University and the grand nephew of Maulana Azad (the first Education Minister of India), has come forward to speak up against the false allegations put on Ashwini Upadhyay for inciting inflammatory slogans at the 8th August event at Jantar Mantar. He said no anti-Muslim or any other sloganeering was heard during 10 am to 11:50 am for the time that he was at the protest.

A historic event to celebrate the anniversary of Quit India Movement received false allegations of promoting anti-Muslim sloganeering. A video surfaced on twitter and other social media platform containing inflammatory slogans. However, these videos were made after the event had wrapped up and Advocate Ashwini Upadhyay had nothing to do with it. Mr. Upadhyay told the ABP News that he invited only 50 participants and wrapped up the event at 12:00 pm after crowd of people started gathering. He also said that he had no connection with the person(s) in the video; they were neither invited nor associated with the event.

Firoz Bakht Ahmed, the Chancellor of Maulana Azad National Urdu University, has confirmed that he was present at the event between 10 a.m. to 11:50 a.m. During this time, he said, no anti-Muslim or any other sloganeering was heard or said. He also went on to say Mr. Upadhyay is a well-meaning BJP leader, he had no connect with any radicalized anti-social or communally conflagrant person as per my assessment.

The event was held to celebrate the anniversary of Quit India Movement and demand abolition of colonial-era laws. These laws were made by British not to give justice to Indians but to strengthen their own power, said Mr. Upadhyay.

Event held to celebrate the anniversary of Quit India Movement and Demand abolition of Colonial-Era Laws

Any inflammatory video or slogans are unrelated to the event. Mr. Upadhyay himself filed a complaint in Delhi Police against the persons involved in the video and demanded strict actions against them. Firoz Bakht Ahmed has shown strong support to confirm this. He released the following statement regarding the event.

My witness for Ashwini Upadhyay:

"According to myself (Firoz Bakht Ahmed s/o Nooruddin Ahmed) , chancellor, Maulana Azad National Urdu University  who was there from 10 AM to 11:50 AM, no anti-Muslim or any other sloganeering was to be heard. Besides, Upadhyay happens to be a poised and focused and law-abiding lawyer as per his social and public life track.

Shri Ashwini Upadhyay is a well-meaning BJP leader, ehi (sic) had no connect with any radicalized anti-social or communally conflagrant person as per my assessment.

Shri Upadhyay should not be held responsible for any slogan/slogans, cognizable under Article 295 (A) or 153 (A). Any case or FIR recorded against (sic) him should be forthwith dissolved.

Firoz Bakht Ahmed
Chancellor
Maulana, Azad National Urdu University
Hyderabad



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

resignation-on-medical-grounds-attracts-forfeiture-of-pension-service-madras-hc-full-bench
Trending Judiciary
Resignation on Medical Grounds Attracts Forfeiture of Pension Service: Madras HC Full Bench [Read Order]

Madras High Court Full Bench rules resignation on medical grounds leads to forfeiture of past service under Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978.

09 February, 2026 12:16 PM
madras-hc-clarifies-section-37-of-ndps-act-not-applicable-to-acceptance-of-bond-for-appearance
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Clarifies: Section 37 of NDPS Act Not Applicable to Acceptance of Bond for Appearance [Read Order]

Madras High Court says Section 37 NDPS Act doesn’t apply to acceptance of bond for appearance on summons, as it is distinct from grant of bail.

09 February, 2026 12:20 PM
sc-refers-matter-to-larger-bench-to-resolve-conflicting-judgments-on-third-partys-right-under-under-order-ix-rule-13-cpc
Trending Judiciary
SC Refers Matter To Larger Bench To Resolve Conflicting Judgments On Third Party’s Right Under Under Order IX Rule 13 CPC [Read Order]

Supreme Court refers the issue of third party rights under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to a larger bench to resolve conflicting judgments on ex parte decrees.

09 February, 2026 12:35 PM
bombay-sessions-court-grants-bail-in-193-crore-cyber-fraud-case-reaffirms-bail-is-rule-jail-is-exception
Trending Judiciary
Bombay Sessions Court Grants Bail in ₹1.93 Crore Cyber Fraud Case, Reaffirms ‘Bail Is Rule, Jail Is Exception’ [Read Order]

Bombay Sessions Court grants bail in ₹1.93 crore cyber fraud case, citing right to liberty as investigation is complete and accused not direct beneficiary.

09 February, 2026 04:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email