38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, December 27, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Case Registered Against Facebook Official for Allegedly Refusing Censorship Against BJP Leaders

By Saransh Awasthi      19 August, 2020 09:47 PM      0 Comments
Case Registered Against Facebook Official for Allegedly Refusing Censorship Against BJP Leaders

The Public Policy Director of Facebook India, Ankhi Das, along with two others, has been named in a FIR filed by a Raipur-based journalist on Tuesday(August 18, 2020) for allegedly hurting religious sentiments and inciting communal animosity. The other two who have been named in the FIR are Ram Sahu, a resident of Mungeli in Chhattisgarh, and Indore resident Vivek Sinha.

The Chhattisgarh Police has said that the FIR was registered in Raipur based on the complaint of Awesh Tiwari who is the State Bureau Chief of a local news channel. The FIR has alleged that Ankhi Das pressured her employees to not take down several hate-speech posts prior to the Lok Sabha elections. He mentions that this was done in order to maintain the companys commercial interest in India. 

Tiwari stated that he had put up a post related to an article published in The Wall Street Journal on his Facebook timeline on 16th August. The article talks about Facebooks bias towards the ruling Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) by refusing censorship against hate-speech posts by the BJP leaders. However, the social media giant has contended that its policies are enforced globally without any regard to political affiliation. There were comments over the facts of the story, which was published in the newspaper (WSJ). I have also mentioned the role of Ankhi Das, which was there in the story. The story mentioned that Das was forcing her subordinates not to remove hate speech posts from Facebook before last years Lok Sabha election for political gains. She had told her subordinates that political relations with the government would be affected because of their (the posts) removal, Tiwaris complaint said. The complaint also included two Facebook users, with names Sahu and Sinha, who jumped in to defend Das and commented on Tiwari's post stating that Das is a Hindu and that she is talking in the interest of the faith. Sahu then allegedly posted derogatory and communally sensitive photographs, even threatened the complainant.

 

The FIR was registered by Tiwari following a complaint lodged by Delhi Polices Cyber Cell which included his name on the basis of allegations by Das on Monday. Earlier, the Delhi Police had registered a case based on a complaint by Das, where she said that she has been getting a "violent threat to her life". In the Delhi FIR, Das has alleged that several people were issuing "threats, making sexually colored remarks and defaming her" through online posts. While identifying some Twitter accounts in the complaint, she has claimed that there was a threat to her life.

However, Tiwari has denied all the allegations leveled against him in the FIR by Das. He asserted that he has never contacted Das nor has he ever threatened against her. I do not know why I have been named in the complaint. I got to know about it from other colleagues. This is a very important issue and I had simply posted points from the report that was originally published by the Wall Street Journal, he added.

Senior Superintendent of Police Ajay Yadav in a statement told that an investigation is underway and further action will be taken accordingly. All three have been booked under Indian Penal Code Sections 295(a) (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings), 505(1)(c) (with intent to incite, or which is likely to incite, any class or community of persons to commit an offense against any other class or community), 506 (criminal intimidation), 500 (defamation) and 34 (common intention).



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

green-shield-or-green-washed-the-legal-and-ecological-paradox-of-the-supreme-courts-new-100-metre-aravalli-standard
Trending Judiciary
Green Shield or Green-Washed? The Legal and Ecological Paradox of the Supreme Court’s New ‘100-Metre’ Aravalli Standard

Supreme Court’s new 100-metre Aravalli definition sparks legal and ecological debate, raising concerns over mining, biodiversity loss, and environmental protection.

26 December, 2025 05:29 PM

TOP STORIES

madras-hc-calls-for-audit-of-fees-paid-to-law-officers-criticises-exorbitant-payments-and-unnecessary-appearances-by-additional-advocate-generals
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Calls for Audit of Fees Paid to Law Officers; Criticises Exorbitant Payments and Unnecessary Appearances by Additional Advocate Generals [Read Order]

Madras High Court calls for audit of fees paid to law officers, flags exorbitant payments and unnecessary appearances by Additional Advocate Generals.

22 December, 2025 08:56 PM
child-born-within-four-months-of-marriage-entitled-to-inheritance-sec-112-of-evidence-act-raises-conclusive-presumption-of-legitimacy-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Born Within Four Months Of Marriage Entitled To Inheritance; Sec 112 of Evidence Act Raises Conclusive Presumption of Legitimacy: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a child born within four months of marriage is legitimate and entitled to inheritance under Section 112 of the Evidence Act.

22 December, 2025 09:07 PM
delhi-hc-stays-cbi-summons-to-advocate-sachin-bajpai-says-lawyers-cannot-be-treated-as-suspects-for-discharging-professional-duties
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Stays CBI Summons to Advocate Sachin Bajpai, Says Lawyers Cannot Be Treated as Suspects for Discharging Professional Duties [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court stays CBI summons to advocate Sachin Bajpai, holding lawyers cannot be treated as suspects for acts done in professional duty.

22 December, 2025 10:52 PM
sc-quashes-498a-cruelty-fir-against-husband-says-vague-allegations-dont-make-out-criminal-offence
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes 498A Cruelty FIR Against Husband, Says Vague Allegations Don’t Make Out Criminal Offence [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court quashes 498A cruelty FIR against husband, holding vague allegations reflect normal marital wear and tear and don’t justify criminal trial.

22 December, 2025 11:13 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email