38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, July 26, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos

By Jhanak Sharma      15 July, 2024 01:58 PM      0 Comments
Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos

Karnataka: In a significant ruling, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Dharwad, Karnataka, has ruled in favor of Sheethal, a woman who did not receive her momos order placed through Zomato in 2023. The courts decision highlighted Zomatos failure to act promptly on the customers complaint.

Sheethal had placed an order for momos on August 31, 2023, and received a delivery confirmation. However, the momos never arrived. Despite reaching out to both the restaurant and Zomato for a resolution, she received no response. Zomato initially requested 72 hours to investigate but did not follow up. Frustrated by the lack of action, Sheethal filed a legal notice against Zomato in September 2023.

In court, Zomato denied any wrongdoing. However, the court noted that Zomatos months of inaction contradicted their initial request for time to resolve the issue. Eventually, in May 2024, Zomato refunded Sheethal the original cost of the momos, which was Rs 133.25.

Court Orders Zomato to Pay Rs 60,000 to Customer

The court found Zomato deficient in service and liable for the inconvenience caused to Sheethal. It ordered Zomato to pay her Rs 50,000 as compensation for mental stress and Rs 10,000 to cover her legal expenses, bringing the total award to Rs 60,000.

Consumer Courts Order

The commission stated, Zomato is carrying out their business of supplying materials in response to the online orders placed by the customer. Despite receipt of the purchase money, Zomato did not deliver the required product to the complainant. By looking into these facts of the case on hand in our opinion Op no. 1 (Zomato) alone is liable to answer the claim of the complainant.

Eshappa K Bhute, president of the commission, ordered Zomato to pay Sheethal Rs 50,000 as compensation for the inconvenience and mental agony caused to her and Rs 10,000 towards her litigation cost.

This ruling emphasizes the responsibility of service providers to ensure timely and effective resolution of customer grievances, highlighting the potential consequences of neglecting customer complaints.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Lawyers services not covered under Consumer Protection Act: SC Lawyers services not covered under Consumer Protection Act: SC

The Supreme Court ruled that lawyer services are not covered under the Consumer Protection Act, as their profession requires specialized skills, education, and training.

Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order] Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order]

Punjab Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for driver abandoning passenger mid-trip, orders Rs. 15,000 compensation and remittance of Rs. 7,500 appeal deposit.

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60,000 for not delivering a Rs 130 momos order, highlighting the importance of timely customer grievance resolution.

SC dismisses plea for directions to mandate doctors to specify side effects of drugs SC dismisses plea for directions to mandate doctors to specify side effects of drugs

SC dismisses plea to mandate doctors disclose drug side effects; cites impracticality, upholds reliance on manufacturers’ inserts for information.

TRENDING NEWS

allegations-against-rahul-gandhi-indicated-deliberate-spreading-of-hatred-up-govt-tells-sc
Trending Executive
Allegations against Rahul Gandhi indicated deliberate spreading of hatred, UP govt tells SC

UP govt tells SC that Rahul Gandhi’s Savarkar remarks show deliberate hate-mongering; supports summons citing prima facie case under Sections 153A & 505 IPC.

25 July, 2025 01:45 PM
sc-raps-ktka-hc-on-manner-of-granting-bail-to-actor-darshan-in-murder-case
Trending Judiciary
SC raps Ktka HC on manner of granting bail to actor Darshan in murder case

SC slams Karnataka HC for granting bail to actor Darshan in murder case, calls reasoning flawed and akin to acquittal; reserves order on state’s plea.

25 July, 2025 01:49 PM

TOP STORIES

fight-your-battles-before-electorate-sc-to-ktka-govt-on-plea-against-quashing-fir-against-bjp-mp-tejaswi-surya
Trending Judiciary
'Fight your battles before electorate,' SC to Ktka govt on plea against quashing FIR against BJP MP Tejaswi Surya

SC tells K’taka to fight political battles at ballot, not court—rejects plea against HC order quashing FIR on Tejasvi Surya’s fake news tweet.

21 July, 2025 01:41 PM
sc-to-consider-on-july-22-president-reference-on-timeline-related-to-bills-passed-by-state-legislatures
Trending Judiciary
SC to consider on July 22 President reference on timeline related to Bills passed by State legislatures

SC to examine Presidential reference on July 22 over court’s power to set timelines for Governor, President on clearing state Bills.

21 July, 2025 01:46 PM
sc-issues-notice-to-centre-states-on-ashwini-upadhyays-pil-seeking-mandatory-disclosure-of-seller-details-under-consumer-protection-act
Trending Judiciary
SC Issues Notice To Centre, States on Ashwini Upadhyay’s PIL Seeking Mandatory Disclosure of Seller Details Under Consumer Protection Act

SC issues notice on Ashwini Upadhyay’s PIL seeking mandatory disclosure of seller details to protect consumers under Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

21 July, 2025 04:47 PM
let-political-battles-be-fought-in-electorate-sc-refuses-to-entertain-eds-plea-against-ktka-cms-wife-in-muda-scam
Trending Judiciary
'Let political battles be fought in electorate,' SC refuses to entertain ED's plea against Ktka CM's wife in MUDA scam

SC refuses to hear ED plea against K’taka CM’s wife in MUDA scam, says political battles must be fought in the electorate, not through agencies.

21 July, 2025 04:56 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email