38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 23, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos

By Jhanak Sharma      15 July, 2024 01:58 PM      0 Comments
Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos

Karnataka: In a significant ruling, the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission in Dharwad, Karnataka, has ruled in favor of Sheethal, a woman who did not receive her momos order placed through Zomato in 2023. The courts decision highlighted Zomatos failure to act promptly on the customers complaint.

Sheethal had placed an order for momos on August 31, 2023, and received a delivery confirmation. However, the momos never arrived. Despite reaching out to both the restaurant and Zomato for a resolution, she received no response. Zomato initially requested 72 hours to investigate but did not follow up. Frustrated by the lack of action, Sheethal filed a legal notice against Zomato in September 2023.

In court, Zomato denied any wrongdoing. However, the court noted that Zomatos months of inaction contradicted their initial request for time to resolve the issue. Eventually, in May 2024, Zomato refunded Sheethal the original cost of the momos, which was Rs 133.25.

Court Orders Zomato to Pay Rs 60,000 to Customer

The court found Zomato deficient in service and liable for the inconvenience caused to Sheethal. It ordered Zomato to pay her Rs 50,000 as compensation for mental stress and Rs 10,000 to cover her legal expenses, bringing the total award to Rs 60,000.

Consumer Courts Order

The commission stated, Zomato is carrying out their business of supplying materials in response to the online orders placed by the customer. Despite receipt of the purchase money, Zomato did not deliver the required product to the complainant. By looking into these facts of the case on hand in our opinion Op no. 1 (Zomato) alone is liable to answer the claim of the complainant.

Eshappa K Bhute, president of the commission, ordered Zomato to pay Sheethal Rs 50,000 as compensation for the inconvenience and mental agony caused to her and Rs 10,000 towards her litigation cost.

This ruling emphasizes the responsibility of service providers to ensure timely and effective resolution of customer grievances, highlighting the potential consequences of neglecting customer complaints.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Lawyers services not covered under Consumer Protection Act: SC Lawyers services not covered under Consumer Protection Act: SC

The Supreme Court ruled that lawyer services are not covered under the Consumer Protection Act, as their profession requires specialized skills, education, and training.

Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order] Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for abandoning passenger mid-trip [Read Order]

Punjab Consumer Court upholds penalty against Uber for driver abandoning passenger mid-trip, orders Rs. 15,000 compensation and remittance of Rs. 7,500 appeal deposit.

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60000 for not delivering Rs 130 Momos

Court orders Zomato to pay Rs 60,000 for not delivering a Rs 130 momos order, highlighting the importance of timely customer grievance resolution.

SC dismisses plea for directions to mandate doctors to specify side effects of drugs SC dismisses plea for directions to mandate doctors to specify side effects of drugs

SC dismisses plea to mandate doctors disclose drug side effects; cites impracticality, upholds reliance on manufacturers’ inserts for information.

TRENDING NEWS

madras-hc-calls-for-audit-of-fees-paid-to-law-officers-criticises-exorbitant-payments-and-unnecessary-appearances-by-additional-advocate-generals
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Calls for Audit of Fees Paid to Law Officers; Criticises Exorbitant Payments and Unnecessary Appearances by Additional Advocate Generals [Read Order]

Madras High Court calls for audit of fees paid to law officers, flags exorbitant payments and unnecessary appearances by Additional Advocate Generals.

22 December, 2025 08:56 PM
child-born-within-four-months-of-marriage-entitled-to-inheritance-sec-112-of-evidence-act-raises-conclusive-presumption-of-legitimacy-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Child Born Within Four Months Of Marriage Entitled To Inheritance; Sec 112 of Evidence Act Raises Conclusive Presumption of Legitimacy: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a child born within four months of marriage is legitimate and entitled to inheritance under Section 112 of the Evidence Act.

22 December, 2025 09:07 PM

TOP STORIES

madras-hc-invokes-ancient-rajadharma-and-kautilyas-arthashastra-govt-has-constitutional-duty-to-provide-legal-aid-to-indian-citizens-abroad
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Invokes Ancient ‘Rajadharma’ and Kautilya’s Arthashastra: Govt Has Constitutional Duty to Provide Legal Aid to Indian Citizens Abroad [Read Order]

Madras High Court invokes Rajadharma and Arthashastra, holds India has a constitutional duty to provide legal aid to citizens facing disputes abroad.

17 December, 2025 06:25 PM
sc-flags-exploitation-of-deity-criticises-paid-special-pujas-at-bankey-bihari-temple
Trending Judiciary
SC Flags ‘Exploitation’ of Deity, Criticises Paid ‘Special Pujas’ at Bankey Bihari Temple

Supreme Court flags exploitation of deity, questions paid special pujas at Bankey Bihari Temple, citing inequality and violation of sacred resting hours.

17 December, 2025 06:36 PM
can-courts-convict-an-accused-when-the-rape-victim-turns-hostile-supreme-court-says-no
Trending Judiciary
Can Courts Convict an Accused When the Rape Victim Turns Hostile? Supreme Court Says ‘No’ [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court acquits rape accused, holding courts cannot presume a victim was “won over” if she turns hostile; FIR alone cannot sustain conviction.

17 December, 2025 08:08 PM
delhi-court-dismisses-eds-pmla-complaint-against-sonia-gandhi-rahul-gandhi-in-national-herald-case-holds-fir-for-scheduled-offence-mandatory
Trending Executive
Delhi Court Dismisses ED’s PMLA Complaint Against Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi in National Herald Case; Holds FIR For Scheduled Offence Mandatory [Read Order]

Delhi court dismisses ED’s PMLA complaint in National Herald case, holding FIR for scheduled offence mandatory before prosecution.

17 December, 2025 08:16 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email