38.6c New Delhi, India, Friday, October 31, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Delhi HC defends Burger King against trademark violation by third-party websites

By Shashwata Sahu      23 May, 2022 12:21 PM      0 Comments
Delhi HC defends Burger King trademark violation

In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court has awarded an ex parte ad interim injunction in favour of 'Burger King' in the trademark infringement suit filed by it against misuse of its registered trademarks in domain names. Justice Jyoti Singh has prohibited the defendants from promoting, offering any goods or services, using or registering corporate names, domain names or pages displaying the trademarks Burger King, BK or any mark deceptively similar to it, in a single-judge bench judgement. (Burger King Corporation v. Swapnil Patil & Ors.)

In the plea, Burger King contended that since starting its business in Miami, Florida in 1954, it has become the second largest quick service restaurant hamburger Company in the world, managing and operating a worldwide chain of over 18,000 quick service restaurants serving more than 11 million customers daily in nearly 100 nations. It was argued that the Burger King trademark/name has been widely used in connection with restaurants and restaurant services since 1954, along with a distinctive logo that has evolved over time. Furthermore, it was argued that Burger King is more than just a trademark or service mark; it's a visible aspect of the company's trading style. 'Burger King' and its abbreviation, "BK" are easily recognisable by the plaintiff, its company, goods, and services.

Because of this, Burger King's reputation and goodwill have grown throughout the world, including in India, according to the plaintiff. It is well-known in India that the well-known trademarks BK, Burger King, and the logos are associated exclusively with the Plaintiff, particularly in the field of restaurant services. The plaintiff's trademarks, which have been in use for a long time and are well-known to the public, including the Indian population, are well-known to the public.

The defendants are accused of using deceptive and misleading domain names to defraud customers. They're also lying when they say that anyone can apply for a Burger King franchise. The defendants are said to operate in a highly secretive manner, and their website does not include their correct address, in an attempt to mislead consumers into believing that their actions are sanctioned by the plaintiff.

It is obvious that these defendants are part of the same organisation or, in some cases, the same person, given their method of operation and the near-identicality of the documents they sent via email to various unaware customers. In order to maximise traffic and give their victims confidence in the legitimacy of their website, the main defendants apply for and obtain registration of

The website prominently displays the Plaintiff's registered trademarks - Burger King, BK, and the Crescent Design Logo - in order to maintain its pretence of legitimacy, the Court was informed. On its website, they also used photos of the plaintiff's overseas restaurants to entice prospective franchisees to apply.

According to the plaintiff's counsel, the alleged misuse of their trademark without their consent harms both their goodwill and reputation as well as the public interest. They want this alleged misuse of their trademark stopped.

The Delhi HC concluded that the plaintiff had put out a prima facie case for an ex parte ad interim injunction and that it should be granted. The Plaintiff has a strong cause for an injunction, and they are likely to suffer irreparable injury if it is denied. Additionally, it requested that Burger King comply with the requirements of Order 39 Rule 3 of the CPC within fourteen days.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM
limitation-for-continuous-breach-runs-only-till-contract-expiry-kerala-hc-clarifies
Trending Judiciary
Limitation for Continuous Breach Runs Only Till Contract Expiry: Kerala High Court Clarifies [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC clarifies that for continuous breach of contract, limitation under Article 55 starts when breach ceases; once contract ends, breach cannot continue.

30 October, 2025 01:37 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-quashes-uapa-arrests-holds-remand-courts-explanation-cannot-replace-written-grounds-of-arrest
Trending Judiciary
SC Quashes UAPA Arrests, Holds Remand Court’s Explanation Cannot Replace Written Grounds Of Arrest [Read Order]

Supreme Court quashes UAPA arrests, ruling that remand court’s explanation cannot substitute the mandatory written grounds of arrest.

25 October, 2025 11:10 AM
ngt-orders-probe-into-illegal-tree-felling-in-delhis-civil-lines-directs-action-within-three-months
Trending Environment
NGT Orders Probe into Illegal Tree Felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines, Directs Action Within Three Months [Read Order]

NGT directs Tree Officer to probe illegal tree felling in Delhi’s Civil Lines and take action under the Delhi Preservation of Trees Act, 1994.

25 October, 2025 11:28 AM
gauhati-hc-quashes-fir-against-cnn-news18-anchor-akansha-swarup-over-kamakhya-temple-remarks
Trending CelebStreet
Gauhati HC Quashes FIR Against CNN-News18 Anchor Akansha Swarup Over Kamakhya Temple Remarks [Read Order]

Gauhati HC quashes FIR against CNN-News18 anchor Akansha Swarup, ruling her Kamakhya Temple remarks were careless but lacked malicious intent.

25 October, 2025 11:43 AM
delhi-hc-upholds-divorce-on-cruelty-grounds-denies-alimony-to-financially-independent-wife
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Upholds Divorce On Cruelty Grounds, Denies Alimony To Financially Independent Wife [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC upholds divorce on cruelty grounds, denies alimony to IRTS officer wife, ruling that alimony is for need-based justice, not enrichment.

25 October, 2025 12:10 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email