38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, March 31, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Delhi High Court Stays Interim Relief Granted to Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited

By Ghazal Bhootra      01 May, 2020 09:25 PM      0 Comments
Delhi High Court Stays Interim Relief Granted to Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited

A two-judge bench of the Delhi High Court on 29th April 2020 stayed an interim order granted by a single-judge bench restraining any coercive action against mortgage lender Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. for failing to pay its dues to non- convertible debentures holders.

The bench consisting of Justice Siddharth Mridul and JusticeTalwant Singh listed the date for final arguments on the case to be 4th May 2020.

Thanks to the division benchs order today, debt-based mutual funds should be much relieved as they will continue to be able to compel payments from their borrowers. If mutual funds remain healthy and continue to receive payments, the general public who hold units in mutual funds will have at least one less reason to worry in these troubled times and will be secured in terms of the value and liquidity of their investments," said Advocate Shankh Sengupta, a partner at Trilegal, and represented the Association of Mutual Funds in India in the appeal.

The temporary order restricting forced action against Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. for its incompetency to reimburse bondholders had increased fears among mutual fund owners that more borrowers could take the same alternative.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India, Indiabulls Housing Finance Trusteeship Services Ltd, and Association of Mutual Funds in India on 28th April 2020 moved to the Delhi High Court against the interim order.

On the final date of the hearing, Senior Advocate Rajiv Nayar, appearing for Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited, had depended on the Reserve Bank of Indias 27 March 2020 circular that gave freedom to all banks and financial institutions to allow a postponement of three months on payment of installments of all term loans that were outstanding between 1 March 2020 and 31 May 2020 conditioned to the borrower making such a requisition.

Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. had stated that it has become unfeasible for the company to execute recoveries of debt owed to it by various institutions owing to the regulatory measures announced by the State, consequential to the disruption caused due to the account of the COVID-19 pandemic outbreak.

Disagreeing with the relevancy of the circular, Senior Advocate Neeraj Malhotra, appearing on behalf of the Securities and Exchange Board of India, had put forward the view that it does not exert influence on the companies liabilities arising from non-convertible debentures. Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd., which was founded in 2005 and is the second-largest housing finance company, has also been involved in a similar altercation with a rating agency, Investment Information and Credit Rating Agency, and had taken it to the court, which later reiterated the short-term credit rating and outlook for the company at A1+ in April 2020. The agency, has, however, demoted the long-term rating outlook for Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited to negative from its previous stable rating.

Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court has decided to hear "all kinds of urgent matters" during the lockdown period owing to the coronavirus, and not restrain its hearings through virtual platforms to 'very urgent matters' after a suggestion made by the Delhi High Court Bar Association.

Besides fresh urgent cases, when urgency arises in pending matters, these will also be considered on a case-to-case basis virtually.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

wifes-domestic-violence-complaint-filed-after-divorce-petition-amounts-to-fresh-cruelty-condonation-cannot-bar-relief-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Wife’s Domestic Violence Complaint Filed After Divorce Petition Amounts to Fresh Cruelty; Condonation Cannot Bar Relief: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras HC grants divorce, holds wife’s post-petition DV complaint amounts to fresh cruelty; condonation cannot bar relief.

30 March, 2026 05:15 PM
daughter-in-law-not-legally-obligated-to-maintain-parents-in-law-allahabad-hc
Trending Judiciary
Daughter-in-Law Not Legally Obligated to Maintain Parents-in-Law: Allahabad HC [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules daughter-in-law not liable to maintain parents-in-law under BNSS; moral obligation not legally enforceable.

30 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email