38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 03, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Disney Gets 37 Rogue Websites Pulled Down

By Richa Shah      24 October, 2020 10:17 PM      0 Comments
Disney Gets 37 Rogue Websites Pulled Down

Last April 2020, the American multinational mass media and entertainment company Disney ordered the removal of a series of URLs and mirror websites and again, the Delhi High Court ordered the pullingdown ofsuch websites dealing in digital piracy.

In the month of September, 118 rogue websites were blocked by Disney. These websites were the ones that streamed Disneys contents illegally.

Along with the defendant Kimcartoon.to and Ors., there were many other websites that were pulled down by Disney such as KissCartoon, KissAnime, and GoGoAnime were also targeted for streamlining Disney shows and cartoons.

Department of Communication (DoT) and the Ministry of Electronics and Information (MEITY) were the organizations involved in the lawsuit as co-defendants.

Disney Enterprises filed the lawsuit as these websites were streaming the original and copyright content created by Disney and that too without any prior authorization from them.

Justice Rajiv Shakdar was the judge in this matter and after carefully analyzing the content on these websites he restrained the defendants from hosting, streamlining, reproducing, distributing, making available to the public and/or communicating to the public or facilitating the same on their websites through the internet in any manner whatsoever any cinematograph work, content, program, and show in which the plaintiffs have copyright. 

This decision was made in order to protect Disney from irreparable damages to its commerce and statutory interest. For protecting the piracy of Disney, the request of the interim injunction was also granted by the Delhi court to protect the originality and creativity of their content. 

The role of defendants i.e. DoT and MEITY was also called an error of description and not intent and they were ordered by the court to block the websites with immediate effect. 

Before 2015, India had never seen a firm crackdown on digital piracy but with the rise of cases gaining significance in number and action, a firm criticism is expected on what is generally shown on the Internet.

This decision is a big relief for the producers of original content creators.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

telangana-hc-cannot-seek-extension-beyond-45-day-limit-to-file-written-version-in-consumer-cases
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC: Cannot Seek Extension Beyond 45-Day Limit to File Written Version in Consumer Cases [Read Order]

Telangana High Court rules written versions in consumer cases cannot be filed beyond the mandatory 45-day limit under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

02 January, 2026 07:13 PM
preventive-detention-cannot-be-used-to-silence-dissenting-voices-of-journalists-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Preventive Detention Cannot Be Used to Silence Dissenting Voices of Journalists: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court warns against misuse of preventive detention to silence journalists, calls it a threat to free speech and liberty.

02 January, 2026 08:04 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-earlier-aravalli-definition-judgment-lists-matter-before-vacation-bench-on-december-29
Trending Judiciary
SC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Earlier Aravalli Definition Judgment; Lists Matter Before Vacation Bench on December 29

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of Aravalli definition issue, lists matter before Vacation Bench on Dec 29, 2025, amid environmental concerns.

28 December, 2025 05:08 PM
bombay-hc-upholds-b-summary-report-dismissing-plea-to-reopen-sexual-assault-case-against-sajjan-jindal
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Upholds B-Summary Report, Dismissing Plea to Reopen Sexual Assault Case Against Sajjan Jindal [Read Order]

Bombay High Court upholds B-summary report, dismisses plea to reopen sexual assault FIR against Sajjan Jindal, citing delay, consent, and lack of merit.

29 December, 2025 05:04 PM
calcutta-hc-holds-scst-act-provisions-not-applicable-to-caste-based-abuses-hurled-over-telephone-holds-conversation-not-in-public-view
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Holds SC/ST Act Provisions Not Applicable To Caste-Based Abuses Hurled Over Telephone, Holds Conversation Not In Public View

Calcutta High Court rules SC/ST Act not applicable to caste-based abuses over telephone, holding such conversations are not in public view.

29 December, 2025 05:13 PM
bombay-hc-holds-padma-awards-cannot-be-used-as-prefix-or-suffix-to-awardees-names
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Holds Padma Awards Cannot Be Used as Prefix or Suffix to Awardees’ Names [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rules Padma awardees cannot use Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan or Bharat Ratna as prefixes or suffixes to their names under Article 18.

29 December, 2025 05:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email