38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, March 11, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

The Future Group Asked to Put a Hold on Deals Made with Reliance till the Dispute Between Amazon and the Former is resolved

By VANDANA KOTHARI      27 October, 2020 06:24 PM      0 Comments
The Future Group Asked to Put a Hold on Deals Made with Reliance till the Dispute Between Amazon and the Former is resolved

The arbitration proceedings between Amazon and Kishore Biyani-headed FutureGroup took place last week in Singapore at the Singapore International Arbitration Centre. The matter was heard by former Singapore Attorney-General V K Rajah as an emergency arbitrator on October 16. 

The case started when Amazon sent a legal notice to Future, alleging the retailers Rs 24,713-crore asset sale to Reliance Industries Ltd breached an agreement with the American e-commerce giant.

The case was that in 2019, Amazon made a deal with Future Retail worth Rs 2000 crore to acquire a 49 percent stake in the promoter firm of Future Retail i.e., Future Coupons. The said deal had few conditions including a non-compete clause and right of first refusal (RoFR) clause, which meant Future could not sell its shares without approval from Amazon. The RoFR gave Amazon the right to be the first to invest in Future Retail if Future decided to sell its shares. But there is another clause that mentioned that the Future could not sell its assets without Amazons approval.

On August 29, 2020, the Future announced its deal with Reliance in which it announced the sale of its retail, wholesale and logistics, etc to Reliance Retail Ventures Ltd (RRVL"), the retail arm of RIL.

On this deal, Amazon approached the Tribunal for interim relief under Rule 30 of Singapore International Arbitration Centre Rules, 2016, and alleged that Future Group violated the contract by entering into the deal with rival Reliance.

Amazon was represented by Gopal Subramanium, Gourab Banerji, Amit Sibal, Alvin Yeo, Amit Mishra from P&A, Anand Pathak, VP Singh, and RachitBahl from AZB assisted by Pawan Bhushan, Hima Lawrence, and UjwalaUppaluri. While Future Retail was represented by advocate Harish Salve, Davinder Singh, Trilegal, and Naik & Naik. 

The Future group contended that it was only selling assets to the Reliance and not its Share therefore they have not violated any conditions of the deal. 

Future Group's Board Resolution of Aug 29 said that Future Enterprises was to "sell by way of a slump sale the retail and wholesale business that includes key formats such as Big Bazaar, fbb, Foodhall, Easyday, Nilgiris, Central and Brand Factory to Reliance Retail and Fashion Lifestyle Limited (RRFLL), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance Retail Ventures Limited (RRVL). It will also sell the logistics and warehouse business to RRVL by way of a slump sale. RRFLL and RRVL will take over certain borrowings and current liabilities related to the business and discharge the balance consideration by way of cash."

On Sunday 25th October, Amazon got interim relief by the Emergency Arbitrator against the Future Group who were asked to put the deal on hold and that the deal cannot go through until it finally decides the matter. 

The Amazon spokesperson while confirming the award said that "We welcome the award of the Emergency Arbitrator. We are grateful for the order which grants all the reliefs that were sought. We remain committed to an expeditious conclusion of the arbitration process."

Reliance Retail Ventures Limited(RRVL) on this step said that it has been informed about the interim order passed and "RRVL intends to enforce its rights and complete the transaction in terms of the scheme and agreement with Future group without any delay,"

The Future Group has also been injuncted from filing or pursuing any application before any Body or Agency in India with respect to the said Board Resolution.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

tarun-holi-murder-case-delhi-police-पर-क्यों-नाराज़-हैं-पड़ोसी-law-street-journal
Trending Videos
Tarun Holi Murder Case: Delhi Police पर क्यों नाराज़ हैं पड़ोसी? || Law Street Journal

In this ground report on the Tarun Holi Murder Case, the team of Law Street Journal reaches Uttam Nagar, Delhi, where a shocking incident during Holi celebrations allegedly led to the death of a young man, Tarun. The dispute reportedly began after a Holi balloon thrown by a child accidentally hit a woman, which later escalated into a violent confrontation.

10 March, 2026 07:33 PM
itat-mumbai-deletes-1159-crore-addition-under-section-69a-brokers-papers-and-retracted-statement-held-insufficient
Trending Judiciary
ITAT Mumbai Deletes ₹11.59 Crore Addition Under Section 69A; Broker’s Papers and Retracted Statement Held Insufficient [Read Order]

Mumbai ITAT deletes ₹11.59 crore addition under Section 69A, holding broker’s papers and a retracted statement insufficient to prove alleged on-money receipts.

11 March, 2026 04:41 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-invokes-article-139a-withdraws-three-decade-old-criminal-revision-petitions-from-allahabad-hc-to-itself
Trending Judiciary
SC Invokes Article 139A, Withdraws Three Decade-Old Criminal Revision Petitions From Allahabad HC To Itself [Read Order]

Supreme Court invokes Article 139A to transfer three decade-old criminal revision petitions from Allahabad High Court to itself, citing exceptional delay and public importance.

06 March, 2026 04:18 PM
deity-may-not-vote-but-constitution-speaks-madras-hc-finds-wilful-contempt-over-delay-in-recovering-507-acres-of-temple-land
Trending Judiciary
“Deity May Not Vote, But Constitution Speaks”: Madras HC Finds Wilful Contempt Over Delay in Recovering 507 Acres of Temple Land [Read Order]

Madras High Court finds wilful contempt by officials for failing to recover 507 acres of temple land, remarking that a deity may not vote but the Constitution must protect its rights.

06 March, 2026 04:38 PM
intra-court-appeal-maintainable-against-ex-parte-ad-interim-orders-affecting-statutory-remedy-rights-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Intra-Court Appeal Maintainable Against Ex Parte Ad Interim Orders Affecting Statutory Remedy Rights: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules intra-court appeals are maintainable against ex parte ad interim orders that affect a party’s right to pursue statutory remedies.

06 March, 2026 04:59 PM
i-was-stalked-in-the-early-days-of-my-practice-justice-savitri-ratho-recalls-experience-at-iwil-national-conference
Trending Legal Insiders
“I Was Stalked in the Early Days of My Practice”: Justice Savitri Ratho Recalls Experience at IWIL National Conference

Justice Savitri Ratho recalls being stalked during her early legal career at the IWIL National Conference, highlighting challenges faced by women in the profession.

09 March, 2026 06:21 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email