38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, September 06, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

The Future Group Asked to Put a Hold on Deals Made with Reliance till the Dispute Between Amazon and the Former is resolved

By VANDANA KOTHARI      27 October, 2020 06:24 PM      0 Comments
The Future Group Asked to Put a Hold on Deals Made with Reliance till the Dispute Between Amazon and the Former is resolved

The arbitration proceedings between Amazon and Kishore Biyani-headed FutureGroup took place last week in Singapore at the Singapore International Arbitration Centre. The matter was heard by former Singapore Attorney-General V K Rajah as an emergency arbitrator on October 16. 

The case started when Amazon sent a legal notice to Future, alleging the retailers Rs 24,713-crore asset sale to Reliance Industries Ltd breached an agreement with the American e-commerce giant.

The case was that in 2019, Amazon made a deal with Future Retail worth Rs 2000 crore to acquire a 49 percent stake in the promoter firm of Future Retail i.e., Future Coupons. The said deal had few conditions including a non-compete clause and right of first refusal (RoFR) clause, which meant Future could not sell its shares without approval from Amazon. The RoFR gave Amazon the right to be the first to invest in Future Retail if Future decided to sell its shares. But there is another clause that mentioned that the Future could not sell its assets without Amazons approval.

On August 29, 2020, the Future announced its deal with Reliance in which it announced the sale of its retail, wholesale and logistics, etc to Reliance Retail Ventures Ltd (RRVL"), the retail arm of RIL.

On this deal, Amazon approached the Tribunal for interim relief under Rule 30 of Singapore International Arbitration Centre Rules, 2016, and alleged that Future Group violated the contract by entering into the deal with rival Reliance.

Amazon was represented by Gopal Subramanium, Gourab Banerji, Amit Sibal, Alvin Yeo, Amit Mishra from P&A, Anand Pathak, VP Singh, and RachitBahl from AZB assisted by Pawan Bhushan, Hima Lawrence, and UjwalaUppaluri. While Future Retail was represented by advocate Harish Salve, Davinder Singh, Trilegal, and Naik & Naik. 

The Future group contended that it was only selling assets to the Reliance and not its Share therefore they have not violated any conditions of the deal. 

Future Group's Board Resolution of Aug 29 said that Future Enterprises was to "sell by way of a slump sale the retail and wholesale business that includes key formats such as Big Bazaar, fbb, Foodhall, Easyday, Nilgiris, Central and Brand Factory to Reliance Retail and Fashion Lifestyle Limited (RRFLL), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Reliance Retail Ventures Limited (RRVL). It will also sell the logistics and warehouse business to RRVL by way of a slump sale. RRFLL and RRVL will take over certain borrowings and current liabilities related to the business and discharge the balance consideration by way of cash."

On Sunday 25th October, Amazon got interim relief by the Emergency Arbitrator against the Future Group who were asked to put the deal on hold and that the deal cannot go through until it finally decides the matter. 

The Amazon spokesperson while confirming the award said that "We welcome the award of the Emergency Arbitrator. We are grateful for the order which grants all the reliefs that were sought. We remain committed to an expeditious conclusion of the arbitration process."

Reliance Retail Ventures Limited(RRVL) on this step said that it has been informed about the interim order passed and "RRVL intends to enforce its rights and complete the transaction in terms of the scheme and agreement with Future group without any delay,"

The Future Group has also been injuncted from filing or pursuing any application before any Body or Agency in India with respect to the said Board Resolution.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

delhi-itat-clears-37-cr-demonetization-cash-deposits-of-jeweller-dismisses-revenues-appeal
Trending Executive
Delhi ITAT Clears ₹3.7 Cr Demonetization Cash Deposits of Jeweller, Dismisses Revenue’s Appeal [Read Order]

Delhi ITAT upholds jeweller’s ₹3.7 cr demonetization cash deposits, ruling them genuine sales; dismisses Revenue’s appeal under Sec 68.

05 September, 2025 11:45 AM
delhi-hc-grants-injunction-to-astrologer-trishla-chaturvedi-orders-removal-of-defamatory-videos-against-trishla-maa
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Grants Injunction to Astrologer Trishla Chaturvedi, Orders Removal of Defamatory Videos Against ‘Trishla Maa’ [Read Order]

Delhi HC grants injunction to astrologer Trishla Chaturvedi, orders removal of defamatory videos and restrains further posts against her.

05 September, 2025 12:02 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-approves-ecs-move-to-accept-claims-or-objections-to-draft-electoral-rolls-beyond-sep-1
Trending Judiciary
SC approves EC's move to accept claims or objections to draft electoral rolls beyond Sep 1

SC allows EC to accept claims and objections to Bihar draft electoral rolls even after Sept 1 deadline, till last date of nominations.

01 September, 2025 02:54 PM
sc-declines-to-entertain-pil-against-20-per-cent-ethanol-blended-petrol-e20-fuel
Trending Judiciary
SC declines to entertain PIL against 20 per cent ethanol-blended petrol, E20 fuel

SC declines PIL against Centre’s E20 fuel rollout, upholding ethanol-blended petrol policy despite concerns on efficiency and vehicle damage.

01 September, 2025 03:01 PM
sc-notice-on-tns-plea-against-hcs-judgment-on-implementation-of-rte-act
Trending Judiciary
SC notice on TN's plea against HC's judgment on implementation of RTE Act

SC issues notice on Tamil Nadu plea against Madras HC order making state solely liable for RTE Act funding, seeks Centre’s response.

01 September, 2025 04:35 PM
sc-upholds-telanganas-4-year-residence-rule-to-avail-domicile-quota-in-medical-admissions
Trending Judiciary
SC upholds Telangana's 4-year residence rule to avail domicile quota in medical admissions [Read Judgment]

SC upholds Telangana’s rule requiring 4 years of study in the state for availing domicile quota in MBBS and BDS admissions.

01 September, 2025 06:02 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email