38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, November 22, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Jaypee Infra IRP files application before SC seeking extension of insolvency process

By Prachi Jain      15 June, 2021 06:54 PM      0 Comments
Jaypee Infra IRP files application before SC seeking extension of insolvency process

Infratech's Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) Anuj Jain has filed an application before the Supreme Court seeking extension of timeline for completion of its resolution process till the first week of July.

State-owned NBCC and Suraksha group are in the fray to acquire the debt-laden realty firm (JIL) and complete over 20,000 pending flats for homebuyers.

The 45 days' time granted by the Supreme Court to complete the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) expired on May 8th 2021.

In the last meeting of JIL's Committee of Creditors (CoC), Jain informed that an application was filed before the court on May 6th 2021 to seek an extension by 30 days, sources said.

On the instructions of the CoC members, Jain filed another application on June 3rd 2021 seeking further extension by 30 days. The applications are likely to be heard in the first week of July, they added.

Jain informed the CoC that the CIRP of JIL has to be completed by July 7th 2021, subject to the Supreme Court's decision on extension of timeline.

He also said all decisions taken by the CoC after May 8th 2021 related to the approvals of resolution plans submitted by the two contenders will be subject to the decision of the apex court on the two applications filed on May 6th 2021 and June 3rd 2021 seeking extension. 

Earlier this week, the financial creditors decided to consider the bids of both state-owned NBCC and Suraksha group to acquire the embattled realty firm at their next meeting scheduled on June 10th 2021 (Thursday).

Just before the start of the meeting of the CoC on Monday, Suraksha group submitted its revised bid, offering more funds to banks while reducing the timeline to complete some stalled projects for benefit of homebuyers.

The Mumbai-based firm did not submit its resolution plan on June 4th 2021 and rather sought at least seven days' extension to sweeten its offer for both homebuyers and bankers. NBCC, however, submitted its resolution plan on June 4.

This is the fourth round of the bidding process in the matter of JIL bankruptcy case.

JIL went into the insolvency process in August 2017 after the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) admitted an application by an IDBI Bank-led consortium.

In the first round of insolvency proceeding, the Rs 7,350-crore bid of Lakshadweep, part of Suraksha Group, was rejected by lenders.

The CoC had rejected the bids of Suraksha Realty and NBCC in the second round held in May-June 2019.

The matter reached the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) and then the apex court.

In November 2019, the Supreme Court directed the completion of JIL insolvency process within 90 days and ordered that the revised bids be invited only from NBCC and Suraksha.

Then in December 2019, the CoC approved the resolution plan of NBCC with 97.36 per cent votes in favour during the third round of the bidding process.

In March 2020, NBCC had got approval from the NCLT to acquire JIL.

However, the order was challenged before the NCLAT and later the Supreme Court, which on March 24 this year ordered that fresh bid should be invited only from NBCC and Suraksha.

The apex court had also directed that the resolution process be completed in 45 days, which lapsed on May 8th 2021.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

superintend-of-police-not-liable-for-investigating-officers-negligence-in-not-filing-chargesheet-closure-report-on-time-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Superintend of Police Not Liable For Investigating Officer’s Negligence In Not Filing Chargesheet/Closure Report On Time: Madras HC [Read Judgment]

Madras High Court rules that Superintendents of Police cannot be held liable for Investigating Officers’ delay in filing chargesheets or closure reports.

21 November, 2025 10:25 AM
india-and-israel-sign-terms-of-reference-to-begin-free-trade-agreement-negotiations
Trending International
India and Israel Sign Terms of Reference to Begin Free Trade Agreement Negotiations

India and Israel sign Terms of Reference to launch Free Trade Agreement talks, aiming to boost trade, reduce barriers, and finalize the pact within 12–18 months.

21 November, 2025 11:27 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-criticises-mp-high-court-for-granting-release-via-habeas-corpus-says-order-shocks-the-conscience
Trending Judiciary
SC Criticises MP High Court for Granting Release via Habeas Corpus, Says Order “Shocks the Conscience” [Read Order]

SC sets aside MP High Court order releasing an accused via habeas corpus, calling the approach impermissible and a misuse of bail jurisdiction.

17 November, 2025 10:20 AM
family-members-undertaking-cannot-replace-bail-conditions-sins-of-accused-cannot-be-visited-on-relatives-sc
Trending Judiciary
Family Member’s Undertaking Cannot Replace Bail Conditions, ‘Sins of Accused Cannot Be Visited On Relatives’: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court sets aside bail in 731 kg ganja case, ruling that a family member’s undertaking cannot substitute mandatory conditions under the NDPS Act.

17 November, 2025 10:33 AM
findings-based-on-assumptions-cannot-replace-evidence-sc-upholds-auction-sale-in-revenue-recovery-dispute
Trending Judiciary
“Findings Based on Assumptions Cannot Replace Evidence”: SC Upholds Auction Sale in Revenue Recovery Dispute [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds a 2005 revenue recovery auction, ruling that statutory remedies not invoked on time cannot be bypassed through writ jurisdiction.

17 November, 2025 11:24 AM
delhi-hc-dismisses-ed-appeals-upholds-unfreezing-of-accounts-in-pmla-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Dismisses ED Appeals, Upholds Unfreezing of Accounts in PMLA Case [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court upholds unfreezing of Poonam Malik’s bank accounts, ruling ED’s freezing orders were based on mere suspicion and violated mandatory PMLA safeguards.

17 November, 2025 11:43 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email