38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, November 13, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Journo Rajat Sharma & India TV secure interim win in "Aap Ki Adalat" vs "Baap Ki Adalat" suit in Delhi HC

By Shreya Agarwal      10 June, 2024 05:44 PM      0 Comments
Journo Rajat Sharma & India TV secure interim win in trademark, personality rights suit in Delhi HC

NEW DELHI: The Delhi High Court has granted interim relief to veteran journalist Rajat Sharma, his show 'Aap Ki Adalat' and television channel India TV interim relief in a plea for protection of their trademark and personality rights. 

India TV and Rajat Sharma had moved the Delhi High Court seeking protection against the alleged misuse of the India TV logo and the Aap Ki Adalat show and mark by one 'Jhandiya TV' utilizing the name and logo "Baap Ki Adalat".

A single judge bench of Justice Anish Dayal restrained the defendant Ravindra Kumar Choudhary from using photos, videos or name of Rajat Sharma either as trademark/logo/trading style, domain name, social media posts, audio video content, or in relation to any services violating the rights of the journalist or India TV.

Issuing a three-fold order in favour of India TV and Rajat Sharma, the Delhi High Court barred the infringing party from using the disputed trademark/logo, such as Baap Ki Adalat, or any deceptively similar marks/logos to India TV and Aap Ki Adalat across mediums including domain names, social media posts, audio-video content, and related services.

Further, protecting Rajat Sharma's personality rights, the bench prohibited 'Jhandiya TV' and its representatives from using Sharma's photos, videos, or name in any form.

To curb the ongoing violations, the Court also ordered take down of violating content from internet platforms - including X (formerly Twitter), YouTube (Google Inc), and Facebook (Meta).

This includes social media posts/links containing the infringing trademarks/logos and additional links identified by India TV must also be removed.

Senior Advocate Rajiv Nayyar and advocates Sudeep Chatterjee, Kunal Vats, Tanya Arora, Jaydeep Roy and Sanyam Suri appeared for India TV and Rajat Sharma.

Cause Title: Independent News Service Private Limited & Anr v Ravindra Kumar Choudhary & Ors .



Share this article:

About:

A wanderer, aspiring yogini and writer. Shreya is a lawyer by profession, journalist by passion. A g...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property' 'Without documentary proof, Waqf Board can't lay claim over any property'

In 2012, the Anjuman Committee addressed a letter to the Chairman of the Waqf Board stating there is a wall and Chabutrah (platform) on a 'Tiranga Ki Qalandari Masjid where in olden times laborers used to offer prayers.

Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment] Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Tribunal's Award Against NHAI in Highway Project Delay Case [Read Judgment]

The Delhi High Court sets aside an Arbitral Tribunal's award favoring IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd over a delay in a highway project. The court finds that the tribunal did not address the essential dispute of whether the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) was in material default, rendering the award invalid.

Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order] Delhi Court Rejects Stay Request in Defamation Case Against Rajasthan CM Ashok Gehlot [Read Order]

A Delhi court refuses to stay the defamation case filed by Union Cabinet minister Gajendra Singh Shekhawat against Rajasthan Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. The court declined to stay the summons and sets a hearing date for August 19.

Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case Delhi High Court to Commence Daily Hearings on August 28 for Appeals Against Acquittals in 2G Case

Delhi High Court is set to begin day-to-day hearings from August 28 for appeals by CBI and ED against acquittals in the 2G spectrum allocation case, expressing displeasure over adjournment requests. The case involves former telecom minister A Raja and business entities. Learn about the proceedings and details of the case.

TRENDING NEWS

allahabad-hc-declares-transgender-rights-act-a-special-law-orders-board-to-amend-educational-records
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Declares Transgender Rights Act a Special Law, Orders Board to Amend Educational Records [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules Transgender Rights Act, 2019 as special law; directs education board to update transgender man’s name and gender in records.

12 November, 2025 11:00 AM
sc-grants-statutory-status-to-delhi-ridge-management-board-to-safeguard-delhis-green-lungs
Trending Judiciary
SC Grants Statutory Status to Delhi Ridge Management Board to Safeguard Delhi’s “Green Lungs” [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court directs statutory status for Delhi Ridge Management Board, calling the Ridge Delhi’s “green lungs” vital to combat rising air pollution.

12 November, 2025 11:15 AM

TOP STORIES

arrest-and-remand-illegal-if-written-grounds-not-provided-two-hours-before-production-sc
Trending Judiciary
Arrest and Remand Illegal if Written Grounds Not Provided Two Hours Before Production: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules arrests and remands illegal if written grounds aren’t furnished at least two hours before the accused’s production before a Magistrate.

07 November, 2025 04:20 PM
adult-christian-daughter-not-entitled-to-maintenance-us-125-crpc-unless-disabled-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Adult Christian Daughter Not Entitled to Maintenance u/s 125 CrPC Unless Disabled: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court held that an adult Christian daughter cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC unless unable to maintain herself due to disability.

07 November, 2025 04:57 PM
magistrates-power-to-order-probe-under-section-156-3-crpc-cannot-be-invalidated-for-mere-technical-errors-sc
Trending Judiciary
Magistrate’s Power to Order Probe Under Section 156(3) CrPC Cannot Be Invalidated for Mere Technical Errors: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that a Magistrate’s order under Section 156(3) CrPC cannot be nullified for minor technical or linguistic errors if offences are made out.

07 November, 2025 05:05 PM
physiotherapists-and-occupational-therapists-cannot-use-dr-prefix-without-medical-qualification-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Physiotherapists And Occupational Therapists Cannot Use ‘Dr’ Prefix Without Medical Qualification: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court restrains physiotherapists and occupational therapists from using ‘Dr.’ prefix without recognized medical qualification.

07 November, 2025 05:32 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email