38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, April 15, 2024

Lalit-Bharat Hotel Group Promoter Jyotsana Suri Caught by Income Tax Department for Stashing INR 1,000 Crore in Foreign Assets

By LawStreet News Network      25 January, 2020 04:01 PM      0 Comments
Lalit-Bharat Hotel Group Promoter Jyotsana Suri Caught by Income Tax Department for Stashing INR 1,000 Crore in Foreign Assets

Eminent businesswoman Jyotsana Suri, promoter of Lalit Hotels and Bharat Hotels Group is caught for stashing Rs.1,000 crores-worth assets abroad illegally. The Income Tax Department conducted a two-three day search at her residences and offices in Delhi and Mumbai. She is now booked under the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, 2015 and the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988.

Jyotsana Suri, wife of hotelier late Lalit Suri is known for her proximity to the former Finance Minister, Late Arun Jaitley. She was also the head of many Industrial bodies such as the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI).

The Income Tax authorities revealed that Jyotsna Suri owned assets in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the United Kingdom (UK) and had several bank accounts that were not declared and would be liable for prosecution under the Black Money Act also. The investigation has successfully lifted the veil, leading to detection of undisclosed foreign assets of more than Rs.1,000 crores, apart from domestic tax evasion of more than Rs.35 crores which may lead to consequences under the Black Money Act, 2015, as also, action under the I-T Act respectively,” the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) said.

Foreign assets include investment in a hotel in the UK, immovable properties in UK and UAE and deposits with foreign banks,” it said.  The CBDT said the group is a leading member of the hospitality industry, running a hotel abroad and a chain of luxury hotels under a prominent brand name situated at various locations in India”.

The search operation has so far resulted in the seizure of unaccounted assets valued at Rs.24.93 crores that include Rs.71.5 lakhs in cash, jewellery worth Rs.23 crores and expensive watches valued at Rs.1.2 crores,” the statement said. The department had launched raids at 13 premises of the group, Suri and others on 19 January, 2020 in and around Delhi.

In 2014 , BJP leader Subramaniam Swamy in his petition to the Supreme Court accused Bharat Hotels of illegally obtaining the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB) clearance during Chidambaram’s tenure and routed more than Rs.200 crores. 


Author: Nandini Gandhi

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Legal Insiders
Need to safeguard judiciary from unwarranted pressures: 21 ex-judges write letter to CJI

21 ex-judges write to CJI Chandrachud urging protection of judiciary from pressures undermining its integrity and autonomy.

15 April, 2024 12:17 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC notice to ED; declines early date on plea by Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal against arrest

SC issues notice to ED, declines early hearing on Delhi CM Kejriwal's plea against arrest in liquor scam.

15 April, 2024 03:08 PM


Trending Judiciary
Location sharing of accused as bail condition: SC directs Google to explain how its PIN location-sharing work

Supreme Court directs Google to explain its PIN location-sharing feature as bail condition for accused, raising privacy concerns. Details sought on technical aspects.

09 April, 2024 02:06 PM
Trending Judiciary
'Can't jail everyone for making allegations against CM,' SC tells Tamil Nadu government

Supreme Court rebukes Tamil Nadu, saying not everyone making allegations against CM can be jailed; restores bail for YouTuber Sattai.

09 April, 2024 02:07 PM
Trending Judiciary
HC dismisses Kejriwal's plea challenging arrest by ED in liquor policy case

Delhi High Court dismisses Arvind Kejriwal's plea challenging his arrest by ED in liquor policy case, ruling it legal. Kejriwal remains in Tihar jail pending Supreme Court relief.

09 April, 2024 05:22 PM
Trending Judiciary
SC allows man to undergo potency test as wife claims marriage not consummated more than 7 years of alliance [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court permits potency test for husband in divorce case where wife alleges marriage unconsummated after 7+ years.

09 April, 2024 05:38 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email