38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, March 04, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Settlement Against DRT Order, NCLAT Orders Review Of Mcdonald's-Vikram Bakshi Settlement [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      23 September, 2019 11:12 AM      0 Comments
'Settlement Against DRT Order, NCLAT Orders Review Of Mcdonald's-Vikram Bakshi Settlement [Read Order]

The settlement of a six-year dispute between McDonalds India and Vikram Bakshi may be in jeopardy, as the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on September 18, 2019, said that it would review and may even reverse their agreement.

The Tribunal said the two sides had failed to obtain its approval for their settlement and the deal appeared to violate an order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) in proceedings initiated by state-owned Housing and Urban Development Corporation (HUDCO) against Bakshi.

The Tribunal ordered Bakshi not to leave the country without informing it or the DRT.

As we find that the parties have reached agreement which has not been approved by this appellate tribunal, prima facie being against the interim order of DRT, we are of the view that the parties should not implement such agreement nor leave this country without intimating the Debt Recovery Tribunal or this appellate tribunal, a two-member NCLAT Bench led by Justice S.J. Mukhopadhaya said.

The case will next be heard on November 19, 2019.

Bakshi has transferred his 50% stake in Connaught Plaza Restaurants Pvt Ltd (CPRL), which operates McDonald's chain in north and east India, to the US-based fast food major and both are seeking to withdraw cases filed against each other before the NCLAT after entering into an out-of-court settlement.

However, the move was contested by HUDCO which is claiming dues of 195 crore from Bakshi.

Hearing an intervention plea by HUDCO, the NCLAT said it may reverse their agreement and the transfer of shares if it finds the deal violated the DRTs order.

The DRT prohibited Bakshi from selling shares in CPRL in a case filed by HUDCO for the recovery of loans advanced to his hospitality business, Ascot Hotels, and had directed him to pay HUDCO Rs 195 crore.

The NCLAT had previously advised Bakshi and HUDCO to reach a settlement so that the tribunal could approve the agreement between McDonalds India and Bakshi.

Bakshis lawyer Amit Sibal said Bakshi had transferred the proceeds from the CPRL share sale to HUDCO. Sibal also said Bakshi had offered to pay Rs 148 crore against the initial loan of Rs 62 crore.

HUDCO, represented by solicitor general Tushar Mehta, however, said HUDCO could not settle for an amount less than the Rs 195 crore determined by the DRT.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

rouse-avenue-court-discharges-arvind-kejriwal-manish-sisodia-and-21-others-in-delhi-excise-policy-case-slams-cbi-for-lack-of-evidence
Trending Executive
Rouse Avenue Court Discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 Others in Delhi Excise Policy Case; Slams CBI for Lack of Evidence

Rouse Avenue Court discharges Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia and 21 others in Delhi Excise Policy case, citing lack of evidence.

27 February, 2026 12:29 PM
sc-imposes-blanket-ban-on-ncert-class-8-social-science-book-over-corruption-in-judiciary-chapter-issues-contempt-notices
Trending Judiciary
SC Imposes Blanket Ban on NCERT Class 8 Social Science Book Over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ Chapter, Issues Contempt Notices [Read Order]

Supreme Court bans NCERT Class 8 textbook over ‘Corruption in Judiciary’ chapter, issues contempt notices and orders nationwide seizure.

27 February, 2026 01:00 PM
sc-holds-limitation-in-drugs-and-cosmetics-act-prosecution-begins-when-identity-of-accused-is-known-not-from-date-of-complaint
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds Limitation in Drugs and Cosmetics Act Prosecution Begins When Identity of Accused Is Known, Not From Date of Complaint [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules limitation in Drugs Act cases begins when identity of accused is known, not from first complaint; Section 202 CrPC not mandatory for public servants.

27 February, 2026 01:30 PM
maintenance-obligation-absolute-cannot-be-evaded-on-pretext-of-unemployment-or-pendency-of-other-proceedings-andhra-pradesh-hc
Trending Judiciary
Maintenance Obligation Absolute, Cannot Be Evaded on Pretext of Unemployment or Pendency of Other Proceedings: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Andhra Pradesh High Court rules maintenance is absolute; unemployment or pending cases cannot excuse a husband from paying wife and child.

02 March, 2026 01:00 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email