38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

NCLAT Upholds JSW Steels Bid For Bhushan Power

By LawStreet News Network      05 February, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) on February 4, 2019, has upheld the 19,300-crore bid placed by JSW Steel for the debt-ridden Bhushan Power & Steel Ltd (BPSL).

A Bench comprising of Justices SJ Mukhopadhaya and Bansi Lal Bhat has dismissed the plea filed by Tata Steel contending that its bid be considered as the best offer, as it had been placed ahead of the deadline.

However, the Bench ruled that Tata Steels plea was premature and unmaintainable and upheld the right of the committee of creditors (CoC) to update, amend, modify or annul its resolution plans.

Earlier, Tata Steel had emerged as the highest bidder for BPSL, which had defaulted on loans worth 47,700 crore. But thereafter Liberty House of the UK submitted a better offer after the bidding deadline. Tata Steel moved the NCLAT against the order passed by the NCLT wherein it had allowed the CoC of BPSL to consider the resolution plan submitted after the deadline.

Meanwhile, JSW Steel revised its offer from 9,500 crore to 19,300 crore and it was approved by the CoC with 97 per cent vote.

We find that the resolution plan submitted by JSW Steel has been approved by the CoC with 97.12 per cent voting shares. If some members of the CoC having 2.88 per cent voting shares remained absent... their shares should not have been counted for voting. We hold that the Resolution Plan submitted by JSW Steel has been approved with 100 per cent voting shares, the order said.

The NCLAT also directed the resolution professional of BPSL to immediately place the approved Resolution Plan before the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT) for its order.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email