38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, March 28, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Public apology published for remarks against top court, IMA chief tells SC

By Jhanak Sharma      09 July, 2024 04:49 PM      0 Comments
Public apology published for remarks against top court IMA chief tells SC

NEW DELHI: The Indian Medical Association on Tuesday informed the Supreme Court that a public apology has been published in media houses by its President Dr R V Asokan for his remarks against the top court in the Patanjali case hearing.

Senior advocate P S Patwalia, appearing for the IMA, submitted before a bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Sandeep Mehta the apology has also been published on IMA's website and also its monthly journal on behalf of the Asokan.

On May 14, 2024, the Supreme Court had severely reprimanded Asokan for making an "attack" on the institution by his remarks in an ongoing contempt proceedings against Yoga Guru Baba Ramdev and Patanjali's MD Acharya Balkrishna in misleading advertisements case.

The bench had then declined to accept the unconditional apology tendered by him during his personal appearance before the court, saying he has to answer for his conduct.

The court had also asked him why he should not tender public apology as done by Ramdev.

Asokan remarks published in a number of newspapers was brought on record through an application filed by Acharya Balkrishna.

His counsel asked the court to take judicial notice of those press statements reportedly made by Asokan for taking appropriate action against him.

In his statement, Asokan had reportedly said, "It does not behove the Supreme Court to take a broadside against the medical profession of the country which after all sacrificed so many lives for the Covid war."

The matter related to a petition filed by the IMA in 2022 alleging a smear campaign by Patanjali and Yoga Guru Baba Ramdev against the Covid vaccination drive and modern systems of medicine.

During the course of the hearing on Tuesday, the court went through the affidavit filed by Dr Asokan on July 6.

The court fixed the matter for further hearing on August 6, to let the respondents go through the affidavit. It also exempted Asokan, who was present in the court, from personal appearance on the next date of hearing.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

SC issues contempt notice against Patanjali SC issues contempt notice against Patanjali

SC issues contempt notice to Patanjali for misleading ads, restrains from advertising medicinal cures, demands action from Centre.

SC seeks personal appearance of Baba Ramdev before court for failing to respond to contempt notice SC seeks personal appearance of Baba Ramdev before court for failing to respond to contempt notice

Supreme Court orders Baba Ramdev's court appearance over Patanjali's misleading ads and non-response to contempt notice, emphasizes legal procedures.

Patanjali Ayurved's Acharya Balkrishna tenders unqualified apology for misleading advertisements Patanjali Ayurved's Acharya Balkrishna tenders unqualified apology for misleading advertisements

Acharya Balkrishna of Patanjali Ayurved apologizes for misleading ads, assures compliance with laws in future, amidst Supreme Court scrutiny.

SC comes down heavily upon Baba Ramdev; rejects apology in contempt case SC comes down heavily upon Baba Ramdev; rejects apology in contempt case

Supreme Court rejects apology from Baba Ramdev and Patanjali in contempt case over misleading advertisements on disease cure. Last chance given.

TRENDING NEWS

section-377-ipc-not-applicable-to-consensual-sexual-acts-between-husband-and-wife-during-marriage-mp-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Section 377 IPC Not Applicable to Consensual Sexual Acts Between Husband and Wife During Marriage: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court holds Section 377 IPC not applicable to sexual acts between husband and wife, partly quashing FIR in dowry and abuse case.

27 March, 2026 03:44 PM
mention-of-quantity-type-in-arrest-notice-sufficient-under-bnss-exact-quantity-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Mention of Quantity Type in Arrest Notice Sufficient Under BNSS, Exact Quantity Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala HC rules that mentioning nature of contraband quantity in arrest notice is sufficient under BNSS; exact quantity need not be specified.

27 March, 2026 04:07 PM

TOP STORIES

conversion-to-religion-other-than-hinduism-buddhism-or-sikhism-strips-sc-status-sc
Trending Judiciary
Conversion To Religion Other Than Hinduism, Buddhism Or Sikhism Strips SC Status: SC

Supreme Court rules conversion from Hinduism, Sikhism or Buddhism leads to loss of SC status; SC/ST Act protection denied to Christian convert.

24 March, 2026 05:20 PM
privacy-vs-prohibition-sc-to-examine-legality-of-breathalyser-based-enforcement-in-bihar
Trending Judiciary
Privacy vs Prohibition: SC to Examine Legality of Breathalyser-Based Enforcement in Bihar

Supreme Court to examine legality of breathalyser tests under Bihar Prohibition law, raising key issues on privacy, evidence, and Article 21 rights.

25 March, 2026 06:14 PM
sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email