New Delhi, India  
Business

Public apology published for remarks against top court, IMA chief tells SC

By Jhanak Sharma      09 July, 2024 04:49 PM      0 Comments
Public apology published for remarks against top court IMA chief tells SC

NEW DELHI: The Indian Medical Association on Tuesday informed the Supreme Court that a public apology has been published in media houses by its President Dr R V Asokan for his remarks against the top court in the Patanjali case hearing.

Senior advocate P S Patwalia, appearing for the IMA, submitted before a bench of Justices Hima Kohli and Sandeep Mehta the apology has also been published on IMA's website and also its monthly journal on behalf of the Asokan.

On May 14, 2024, the Supreme Court had severely reprimanded Asokan for making an "attack" on the institution by his remarks in an ongoing contempt proceedings against Yoga Guru Baba Ramdev and Patanjali's MD Acharya Balkrishna in misleading advertisements case.

The bench had then declined to accept the unconditional apology tendered by him during his personal appearance before the court, saying he has to answer for his conduct.

The court had also asked him why he should not tender public apology as done by Ramdev.

Asokan remarks published in a number of newspapers was brought on record through an application filed by Acharya Balkrishna.

His counsel asked the court to take judicial notice of those press statements reportedly made by Asokan for taking appropriate action against him.

In his statement, Asokan had reportedly said, "It does not behove the Supreme Court to take a broadside against the medical profession of the country which after all sacrificed so many lives for the Covid war."

The matter related to a petition filed by the IMA in 2022 alleging a smear campaign by Patanjali and Yoga Guru Baba Ramdev against the Covid vaccination drive and modern systems of medicine.

During the course of the hearing on Tuesday, the court went through the affidavit filed by Dr Asokan on July 6.

The court fixed the matter for further hearing on August 6, to let the respondents go through the affidavit. It also exempted Asokan, who was present in the court, from personal appearance on the next date of hearing.



Share this article:

About:

Jhanak is a lawyer by profession and legal journalist by passion. She graduated at the top of her cl...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

SC issues contempt notice against Patanjali SC issues contempt notice against Patanjali

SC issues contempt notice to Patanjali for misleading ads, restrains from advertising medicinal cures, demands action from Centre.

SC seeks personal appearance of Baba Ramdev before court for failing to respond to contempt notice SC seeks personal appearance of Baba Ramdev before court for failing to respond to contempt notice

Supreme Court orders Baba Ramdev's court appearance over Patanjali's misleading ads and non-response to contempt notice, emphasizes legal procedures.

Patanjali Ayurved's Acharya Balkrishna tenders unqualified apology for misleading advertisements Patanjali Ayurved's Acharya Balkrishna tenders unqualified apology for misleading advertisements

Acharya Balkrishna of Patanjali Ayurved apologizes for misleading ads, assures compliance with laws in future, amidst Supreme Court scrutiny.

SC comes down heavily upon Baba Ramdev; rejects apology in contempt case SC comes down heavily upon Baba Ramdev; rejects apology in contempt case

Supreme Court rejects apology from Baba Ramdev and Patanjali in contempt case over misleading advertisements on disease cure. Last chance given.

TRENDING NEWS

writ-courts-cannot-examine-merits-in-section-16-arbitration-challenges-sc
Trending Judiciary
Writ Courts Cannot Examine Merits in Section 16 Arbitration Challenges: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules writ courts cannot examine merits while reviewing Section 16 arbitration orders; stamping objections can be raised under Section 34.

30 May, 2026 11:37 AM
god-wont-wait-for-ministers-madras-hc-questions-vip-darshan-system
Trending Judiciary
“God Won’t Wait For Ministers”: Madras HC Questions VIP Darshan System

Madras High Court questions VIP darshan in temples, saying all are equal before God, and hears PIL seeking abolition of paid and preferential access.

30 May, 2026 11:55 AM

TOP STORIES

can-a-testator-legally-disinherit-his-wife-and-children-in-favour-of-a-sibling-sc-answers
Trending Judiciary
Can A Testator Legally Disinherit His Wife And Children In Favour Of A Sibling ? SC Answers [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that excluding a wife and children from a Will in favour of a sibling is not by itself a suspicious circumstance.

25 May, 2026 01:07 PM
petition-filed-in-supreme-court-seeks-cbi-probe-into-fake-law-degrees-and-the-cockroach-janta-party-campaign
Trending Judiciary
Petition Filed in Supreme Court Seeks CBI Probe into Fake Law Degrees and the ‘Cockroach Janta Party’ Campaign

Petition in Supreme Court seeks CBI probe into fake law degrees and the “Cockroach Janta Party” campaign over CJI Surya Kant’s remarks.

25 May, 2026 02:15 PM
jharkhand-hc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-alleged-sexual-assault-of-female-inmate-by-jail-superintendent
Trending Judiciary
Jharkhand HC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Alleged Sexual Assault of Female Inmate by Jail Superintendent [Read Order]

Jharkhand High Court takes suo motu cognisance of alleged sexual assault of female inmate by jail superintendent at Ranchi jail.

25 May, 2026 02:39 PM
delhi-hc-stays-coercive-action-against-indigo-in-rs-458-crore-gst-compensation-dispute
Trending Business
Delhi HC Stays Coercive Action Against IndiGo In Rs. 458 Crore GST Compensation Dispute [Read Order]

Delhi High Court protected IndiGo from coercive action in a Rs. 458 crore GST dispute over compensation received from a foreign engine supplier.

26 May, 2026 01:31 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email