38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 03, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Delhi HC Rejects Trademark Infringement Plea by Britannia Against ITC's Sunfeast Digestive Biscuits

By Tanya Sehrawat      07 April, 2021 01:27 PM      0 Comments
Trademark Infringement Britannia Sunfeast

Britannia Industries Limited filed a Trademark Infringement Suit against ITC, accusing its Sunfeast Farmlite Digestive Biscuits of being an exact copy of Britannia's Nutri Choice Digestive Biscuits. 

The said petition was dismissed by a single judge Bench of Justice C Hari Shankar of the Delhi High Court on April 6, 2021.

Britannia had registered a trademark on the packaging of NutriChoice Digestive biscuits on Sep 11, 2020. The same was being used by it since 2014. However, different packaging was used by Sunfeast then. 

Following this, Britannia claimed change in Sunfeasts FarmLite 5-Seed Digestive biscuits as on September 28, 2020 so as to be deceptively similar NutriChoice's packaging. It accused Sunfeast of taking advantage of its reputation and goodwill.

While taking note of Sections 29(1) and 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, the Court said that they must be interpreted so as to observe "points of dissimilarity between rival marks cannot be regarded as irrelevant." Along with this, the Court held that ITC Sunfeast's FarmLite Digestive Biscuits could not be stated as deceptively similar to Britannia's NutriChoice Digestive biscuits to the extent that one with average intelligence alongside imperfect recollection could get confused between the two. 

The Court also said:

"The perception, whether in the case of infringement or passing off, is to be that of a person of average intelligence and imperfect recollection not of an idiot, or an amnesiac. The average human mind has not been particularly conditioned to observe only similarities, and overlook dissimilarities.

The Court highlighted that the biscuits of the two companies could be sufficiently differentiated and said that, "If similarities can cause deception or confusion, dissimilarities, if sufficient, can also obviate any such possibility. It was further observed how a person of average intelligence and imperfect recollection cannot said to be easily confused. 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

telangana-hc-cannot-seek-extension-beyond-45-day-limit-to-file-written-version-in-consumer-cases
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC: Cannot Seek Extension Beyond 45-Day Limit to File Written Version in Consumer Cases [Read Order]

Telangana High Court rules written versions in consumer cases cannot be filed beyond the mandatory 45-day limit under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

02 January, 2026 07:13 PM
preventive-detention-cannot-be-used-to-silence-dissenting-voices-of-journalists-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Preventive Detention Cannot Be Used to Silence Dissenting Voices of Journalists: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court warns against misuse of preventive detention to silence journalists, calls it a threat to free speech and liberty.

02 January, 2026 08:04 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-takes-suo-motu-cognisance-of-earlier-aravalli-definition-judgment-lists-matter-before-vacation-bench-on-december-29
Trending Judiciary
SC Takes Suo Motu Cognisance of Earlier Aravalli Definition Judgment; Lists Matter Before Vacation Bench on December 29

Supreme Court takes suo motu cognisance of Aravalli definition issue, lists matter before Vacation Bench on Dec 29, 2025, amid environmental concerns.

28 December, 2025 05:08 PM
bombay-hc-upholds-b-summary-report-dismissing-plea-to-reopen-sexual-assault-case-against-sajjan-jindal
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Upholds B-Summary Report, Dismissing Plea to Reopen Sexual Assault Case Against Sajjan Jindal [Read Order]

Bombay High Court upholds B-summary report, dismisses plea to reopen sexual assault FIR against Sajjan Jindal, citing delay, consent, and lack of merit.

29 December, 2025 05:04 PM
calcutta-hc-holds-scst-act-provisions-not-applicable-to-caste-based-abuses-hurled-over-telephone-holds-conversation-not-in-public-view
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Holds SC/ST Act Provisions Not Applicable To Caste-Based Abuses Hurled Over Telephone, Holds Conversation Not In Public View

Calcutta High Court rules SC/ST Act not applicable to caste-based abuses over telephone, holding such conversations are not in public view.

29 December, 2025 05:13 PM
bombay-hc-holds-padma-awards-cannot-be-used-as-prefix-or-suffix-to-awardees-names
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Holds Padma Awards Cannot Be Used as Prefix or Suffix to Awardees’ Names [Read Order]

Bombay High Court rules Padma awardees cannot use Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan or Bharat Ratna as prefixes or suffixes to their names under Article 18.

29 December, 2025 05:17 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email