38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, April 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Business

Zee moves Bombay High Court to declare Invesco's requisition notice illegal, invalid

By Dolly Chhabda      06 October, 2021 02:16 PM      0 Comments
Zee moves Bombay High Court to declare Invesco's requisition notice illegal, invalid

Zee Entertainment Enterprises has filed a petition before the Bombay High Court asking it to declare the requisition by a foreign investor to hold an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) as illegal and invalid.

ZEE announced that its board has rejected the request of shareholders, Invesco and OFI Global China Fund, to convene an EGM to discuss various issues, including removal of Managing Director Punit Goenka.

According to ZEE, the appointment of new independent directors, as proposed by Invesco in the requisition notice, is subject to prior approval from the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting.

On September 30, 2021 the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) at Mumbai had directed the Board of Directors (BoD) of Zee Entertainment Enterprises (ZEE) to consider requisition made by the companys largest investor to hold an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) by October 3,2021. 

A bench of Bhaskara Pantula Mohan and CB Singh said, We direct respondents (ZEE) to consider requisition made by the petitioners (Invesco) under the Companies Act positively and comply with section 100 of Companies Act.

The tribunal was hearing an application filed by the shareholders to hold an EGM and consider removal of MD & CEO Punit Goenka and two other non-independent non-executive directors from the companys board and induction of six new independent directors.

The promoters, including Goenka, hold 3.99 per cent of the shares in the company. The remaining 96.01 percent of the shares are held by the public of which the two petitioners, together, hold 18 percent shares in ZEE. 

The NCLT was expected to hear Invescos plea on October 4, 2021. However, on the said date, the National Company law Tribunal adjourned the hearing on the tiff between Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd and Invesco after hearing initial remarks from the latter. 

The tribunal hearer the matter on October 5, 2021 wherein Invesco urged the NCLT to pass an order to ensure the convening of the company's Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM). Its counsel Mukul Rohatgi told the court that it was mandatory duty" of Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd (ZEEL) to honour the EGM requisition as Invesco has 18 per cent shareholding in the company and as per law, a minimum of 10 cent shareholding is needed to request for convening an EGM.

By not convening the EGM, Zee will create hindrances if funds call for EGM independently, Rohatgi argued, further requesting appointment of a retired High Court judge to chair the EGM.

The Tribunal thereafter asked Zee Entertainment to file reply on Invesco's plea for EGM by Thursday (October 7, 2021) and adjourned the hearing for the same date.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

reporting-an-fir-is-not-a-media-trial-sikkim-high-court-dismisses-writ-seeking-gag-on-press-coverage-of-criminal-case
Trending Judiciary
Reporting an FIR Is Not a Media Trial: Sikkim High Court Dismisses Writ Seeking Gag on Press Coverage of Criminal Case [Read Judgment]

Sikkim HC holds FIR reporting isn’t a media trial, dismisses plea to restrain press coverage and uphold privacy claims under Article 21.

15 April, 2026 02:17 PM
kerala-hc-upholds-injunction-against-hazza-restaurant-holds-mark-deceptively-similar-to-lazza-trademark
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Upholds Injunction Against ‘HAZZA’ Restaurant, Holds Mark Deceptively Similar to ‘LAZZA’ Trademark [Read Judgment]

Kerala HC upholds injunction against HAZZA Kitchen, ruling it deceptively similar to LAZZA trademark; finds likelihood of confusion and protects brand rights.

15 April, 2026 04:29 PM

TOP STORIES

bombay-hc-questions-why-indians-follow-traffic-rules-abroad-but-not-in-india-enhances-accident-compensation
Trending Judiciary
Bombay HC Questions Why Indians Follow Traffic Rules Abroad but Not in India; Enhances Accident Compensation [Read Judgment]

Bombay High Court questions Indians’ traffic rule compliance, enhances compensation to ₹15.15 lakh in TMTC bus accident case involving priest’s death.

10 April, 2026 02:20 PM
telangana-hc-grants-pawan-khera-one-week-transit-anticipatory-bail-in-assam-fir-case
Trending Judiciary
Telangana HC Grants Pawan Khera One-Week Transit Anticipatory Bail in Assam FIR Case

Telangana High Court grants Pawan Khera one-week transit anticipatory bail in Assam FIR, allowing him time to seek regular bail before jurisdictional court.

10 April, 2026 03:38 PM
sc-stays-criminal-proceedings-against-priest-booked-for-remarks-on-christianity
Trending Judiciary
SC Stays Criminal Proceedings Against Priest Booked for Remarks on Christianity

Supreme Court stays criminal proceedings against a priest booked under Section 295A IPC for remarks claiming Christianity as the only true religion.

10 April, 2026 04:37 PM
sabarimala-review-sc-constitution-bench-examines-scope-of-religious-freedom-erp-doctrine-and-constitutional-morality
Trending Judiciary
Sabarimala Review: SC Constitution Bench Examines Scope of Religious Freedom, ERP Doctrine, and Constitutional Morality

Supreme Court’s 9-judge Bench hears Sabarimala review, examining ERP doctrine, religious freedom, and Articles 25 and 26.

10 April, 2026 04:47 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email