New Delhi, India  
CelebStreet

Allahabad High Court rejects PIL seeking a ban on broadcast of Amazon Prime web series Paatal Lok

By Shreya Tulavi      01 October, 2020 05:47 PM      0 Comments
Allahabad High Court rejects PIL seeking a ban on broadcast of Amazon Prime web series Pataal Lok

In a big relief for makers of the Pataal Lok web series, the Allahabad High Court has rejected a fresh PIL seeking the courts direction to stop the broadcast of the Amazon Prime web series. While refusing to accept the petition and intervene in the matter, the Allahabad High Court said that the petitioner should make a complaint before a competent central government authority. The high court also directed the petitioner to file a complaint in four weeks, In its order, the court said that the competent authority should take a call as per laid procedures.

The petitioner has alleged that the content of the web series is highly controversial in nature and it depicts things contrary to the principles of the Sanatan Dharma. The petition further alleged that its broadcast violates the fundamental rights mentioned in Articles 25 and 26, A Public Interest Litigation seeking a ban of the broadcast of the web series was filed by advocate Sangeeta Gupta. The matter was taken up by a bench of Chief Justice Govind Mathur and Justice Siddharth Verma. It may be recalled that the Calcutta High Court had earlier dismissed a plea seeking a ban on the web series. 

The plea, filed by a petitioner named Pranay Rai, contended that certain scenes of the Amazon Prime web series Paatal Lok are defamatory to Nepalese people and put a bad discourse of the Nepalese community. The PIL was finally disposed of by the High Court against the web series and the court further directed to consider the grievance raised in the regard of the content of the series and pass appropriate and justifiable orders.

Notices had been issued by Punjab and Haryana High Court to central and state governments regarding the regulation of the content of the web series. The plea notice was filed by the learned advocate of the high court Gurdeepinder Singh Dhillon, who alleged that the content depicted in the web series is illegal, antisocial, vulgar, abusive, minority oppressive, and anti-national.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

senior-advocate-mahalakshmi-pavani-among-members-of-new-supreme-court-election-tribunals
Trending Judiciary
Senior Advocate Mahalakshmi Pavani Among Members of New Supreme Court Election Tribunals [Read Order]

Supreme Court forms two new Election Tribunals for State Bar Council poll disputes; Senior Advocate Mahalakshmi Pavani named a member.

19 May, 2026 11:48 AM
madras-hc-stays-tamil-nadu-cyber-crime-wings-omnibus-x-blocking-order-says-political-criticism-constitutionally-protected
Trending Judiciary
Madras HC Stays Tamil Nadu Cyber Crime Wing’s Omnibus X Blocking Order, Says Political Criticism Constitutionally Protected [Read Order]

Madras High Court stays Tamil Nadu Cyber Crime Wing’s omnibus X blocking order, holding political criticism is constitutionally protected speech.

19 May, 2026 12:36 PM
sc-approves-three-tier-nationwide-icu-framework-says-india-in-dreadful-position
Trending Judiciary
SC Approves Three-Tier Nationwide ICU Framework; Says India in “Dreadful Position”

Supreme Court approves nationwide three-tier ICU framework, calls India’s healthcare system in a “dreadful position”, and seeks urgent reforms.

21 May, 2026 10:55 AM
sc-pulls-up-sbi-says-banks-harass-small-borrowers-while-being-lenient-with-big-defaulters
Trending Judiciary
SC Pulls Up SBI, Says Banks Harass Small Borrowers While Being Lenient With Big Defaulters [Read Order]

Supreme Court criticised SBI and banks for being lenient with big defaulters while subjecting small borrowers to borderline harassment.

21 May, 2026 11:51 AM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email