38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, December 15, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Supreme Court Stays Rs 10 Lakh Fine Imposed On Vishal Dadlani, Tehseen Poonawalla [Read Order]

By LawStreet News Network      04 September, 2019 10:28 AM      0 Comments

The Supreme Court on September 2, 2019, stayed the Punjab and Haryana High Court order imposing a fine of Rs 10 lakh each on political activists Tehseen Poonawalla and music composer and singer Vishal Dadlani for mocking Jain monk Tarun Sagar.

A Bench comprising of Justices Rohinton Nariman and Surya Kant issued notice to the Haryana Government on the plea filed by Tehseen Poonawalla against the judgment of the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court on April 29, 2019, imposed the fine on Vishal Dadlani and Tehseen Poonawala for insulting Jain Saint Tarun Sagar in a series of tweets in 2016, even though the court quashed criminal cases registered against them as no criminal offence was made out in the case. However, the court imposed the fine to give a message so that no one mocked the heads of religious sects.

Dadlani and Poonawalla were booked by the Haryana Police in August 2016 in Ambala Cantonment for hurting the religious sentiments of the Jain community.

Dadlani, in his tweets, had criticized Tarun Sagars nude appearance as well as the action of the Haryana Government in calling a religious Guru in the Legislative Assembly. Whereas, Poonawala had put seminude photograph of a lady by way of a Photoshop with the Jain saint and had raised a finger towards his character by comparing him with a slut.

The case against both was registered "for deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage the religious feelings and other offences" under Sections 295-A, 153-A and 509 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, at Ambala Cantonment police station.

[Read Order]



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

ranveer-singhs-dhurandhar-barred-from-release-across-gulf-states-amid-content-sensitivity-concerns
Trending CelebStreet
Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar Barred from Release Across Gulf States Amid Content Sensitivity Concerns

Ranveer Singh’s Dhurandhar fails to secure release approval in six GCC countries amid concerns over politically sensitive content.

14 December, 2025 12:40 AM

TOP STORIES

scwla-hails-supreme-courts-historic-30-reservation-for-women-in-state-bar-councils-a-landmark-leap-for-gender-parity-in-the-legal-profession
Trending Legal Insiders
SCWLA Hails Supreme Court’s Historic 30% Reservation for Women in State Bar Councils: A Landmark Leap for Gender Parity in the Legal Profession [Read Press Release]

Supreme Court orders 30% reservation for women in State Bar Councils; SCWLA welcomes the landmark verdict as a major step toward gender equality in the legal profession.

09 December, 2025 04:45 PM
only-central-state-employees-fall-under-section-2e-gratuity-exclusion-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Only Central, State Employees Fall Under Section 2(e) Gratuity Exclusion: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court rules KSBC retired abkari workers are entitled to gratuity, holding that Section 2(e) exclusion applies only to government employees.

09 December, 2025 08:28 PM
civic-bodies-have-authority-to-revise-property-tax-rates-courts-cannot-substitute-judgment-on-policy-decisions-sc
Trending Judiciary
Civic Bodies Have Authority to Revise Property Tax Rates; Courts Cannot Substitute Judgment on Policy Decisions: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court upholds municipal autonomy to revise property tax rates, ruling that courts cannot interfere in policy decisions absent arbitrariness or illegality.

09 December, 2025 08:35 PM
hostile-witness-testimony-cannot-be-rejected-in-toto-supreme-court-reiterates-settled-legal-position
Trending Judiciary
Hostile Witness Testimony Cannot Be Rejected in Toto: Supreme Court Reiterates Settled Legal Position [Read Judgment]

Hostile witness testimony cannot be rejected entirely, the Supreme Court held, reaffirming that credible portions supporting prosecution or defence must still be considered.

09 December, 2025 08:44 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email