38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, December 09, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Kerala Court Acquits Actor Dileep in 2017 Assault Conspiracy Case; Prime Accused Pulsar Suni and Five Others Convicted

By Saket Sourav      08 December, 2025 08:39 PM      0 Comments
Kerala Court Acquits Actor Dileep in 2017 Assault Conspiracy Case Prime Accused Pulsar Suni and Five Others Convicted

Kerala: In a landmark verdict following nearly eight years of intense legal proceedings, a Kerala sessions court on Monday acquitted prominent Malayalam actor Dileep, also known as P. Gopalakrishnan, the eighth accused in the 2017 sexual assault and abduction case. However, the court simultaneously convicted the prime accused, Sunil Kumar alias Pulsar Suni, along with five other individuals directly involved in the assault.

The verdict was pronounced by the Additional Special Sessions Court (SPE/CBI–III), Ernakulam, presided over by Special Judge Honey M. Varghese. The court ruled that the prosecution had failed to establish the conspiracy charge against Dileep beyond reasonable doubt.

Dileep had been charged with criminal conspiracy under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly orchestrating what has been described as the first case of “quotation rape,” involving the hiring of individuals to rape a woman. The prosecution claimed that Dileep masterminded and financed the crime as an act of personal vengeance, alleging that the survivor had exposed his relationship with actor Kavya Madhavan to his then-wife, Manju Warrier. The court held that the evidence presented by the prosecution did not conclusively link Dileep to the alleged conspiracy to abduct and assault the survivor.

Following his acquittal, Dileep claimed that the “real conspiracy” was an attempt to frame him and destroy his career, alleging that a few police officials “used the first accused” and the media to spread a false narrative. He also suggested that the conspiracy against him was connected to statements made by his former wife, Manju Warrier, after she hinted at foul play.

While the conspiracy charge against Dileep collapsed, the court found Pulsar Suni guilty of rape. Suni was held responsible for carrying out the assault and recording the visuals that were later used to extort the survivor. The court also found five co-accused — Martin Antony, Manikandan B., Vijeesh V. P., Salim H., and Pradeep — guilty. These individuals, whom the judge held directly involved in the crime, were convicted under multiple provisions of the Indian Penal Code, including criminal conspiracy, kidnapping, use of criminal force to outrage modesty, use of force with the intention to disrobe a woman, and gang rape. They were also convicted under provisions of the Information Technology Act for recording the sexual assault. The court is scheduled to pronounce the quantum of sentence for the six convicted individuals on December 12.

Special Public Prosecutor V. Ajayakumar stated that the prosecution would study the ruling, saying, “We need to examine the judgment to understand why the court did not consider the evidence presented against Dileep.” The survivor’s counsel, Advocate T. B. Mini, stated that she would comment after reviewing the judgment in detail.

The case, concerning the abduction and sexual assault of a prominent woman actor in a moving car in Kochi on February 17, 2017, has been among the most closely watched in Kerala’s history. The trial, which began in January 2020 and spanned nearly five years, was marked by intense legal battles and delays. The proceedings saw allegations of digital-evidence tampering, several hostile witnesses, and multiple petitions filed by the accused. The prosecution team changed several times, and both the survivor and the state government repeatedly sought the replacement of Judge Honey M. Varghese, citing alleged bias — pleas that were rejected at various judicial levels.

The matter escalated further when a forensic report revealed irregularities concerning digital evidence, showing that the memory card containing visuals of the assault — which was in the custody of the court — had been accessed illegally.

Beyond the courtroom, the case triggered a reckoning over systemic misogyny, abuse of power, and unsafe working conditions within the Malayalam film industry. In 2017, the incident led to the formation of the Women in Cinema Collective (WCC). The WCC’s activism prompted the Kerala government to constitute the Hema Committee in 2019 to study workplace harassment and gender discrimination. Although the committee submitted its report the same year, its heavily redacted findings became public only in August 2024 after a Kerala High Court order, sparking a renewed wave of #MeToo allegations in the industry.

Dileep, who was arrested on July 10, 2017, had been released on conditional bail in October 2017. Suni, who had been in custody since 2017, was granted bail by the Supreme Court in September 2024, citing extensive delays in the trial.
 



Share this article:

About:

Saket is a final-year law student at The National Law University and Judicial Academy, Assam. He has...Read more

Follow:
Linkedin


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Kerala HC stays summons issued to WhatsApp India Rep in obscene video case Kerala HC stays summons issued to WhatsApp India Rep in obscene video case

The Kerala High Court stayed a summons issued to WhatsApp India representative in connection with an obscene video case.

'Relationship may not remain consensual for all time to come,' SC declines to quash rape FIR [Read Order] 'Relationship may not remain consensual for all time to come,' SC declines to quash rape FIR [Read Order]

Supreme Court asserts that consent in relationships can change, rejecting a plea to quash a rape FIR, emphasizing ongoing consent is key.

SC reserves order if downloading or watching child pornography offence SC reserves order if downloading or watching child pornography offence

SC reserves order on child pornography offence, clarifies nuances under POCSO and IT Act.

AI cant detect consent Microsoft and Google tell Delhi High Court AI cant detect consent Microsoft and Google tell Delhi High Court

Microsoft and Google tell Delhi HC that AI can't detect consent for NCII takedowns, challenging a 24-hour removal directive under IT Act's safe harbour protections.

TRENDING NEWS

sc-questions-precedent-on-contractual-bars-to-arbitration-claims-refers-bharat-drilling-to-larger-bench
Trending Judiciary
SC Questions Precedent on Contractual Bars to Arbitration Claims, Refers ‘Bharat Drilling’ to Larger Bench [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court refers the 2009 Bharat Drilling ruling to a larger bench, questioning its use in interpreting contractual bars on arbitration claims.

08 December, 2025 04:45 PM
j-and-k-high-court-upholds-dismissal-of-injunction-plea-in-agrarian-reforms-dispute
Trending Judiciary
J&K High Court Upholds Dismissal of Injunction Plea in Agrarian Reforms Dispute [Read Order]

J&K High Court upholds dismissal of injunction plea, ruling that agrarian disputes fall under Agrarian Reforms Act authorities, not civil courts.

08 December, 2025 05:21 PM

TOP STORIES

hostile-india-china-ties-no-extradition-treaty-allahabad-hc-denies-bail-to-chinese-national-in-visa-forgery-case
Trending Judiciary
Hostile India–China Ties, No Extradition Treaty: Allahabad HC Denies Bail to Chinese National in Visa Forgery Case [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court denies bail to a Chinese national accused of visa tampering and forging Indian IDs, citing hostile India–China ties and no extradition treaty.

03 December, 2025 12:53 AM
attachment-before-judgment-cannot-cover-property-sold-prior-to-suit-filing-sc
Trending Judiciary
Attachment Before Judgment Cannot Cover Property Sold Prior to Suit Filing: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court holds that property transferred before a suit cannot be attached under Order 38 Rule 5; fraud allegations must be pursued separately under Section 53 TP Act.

03 December, 2025 01:30 AM
sc-holds-no-review-or-appeal-maintainable-against-order-appointing-arbitrator
Trending Judiciary
SC Holds No Review Or Appeal Maintainable Against Order Appointing Arbitrator [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that no review, recall or appeal lies against a Section 11 arbitrator appointment order, reaffirming minimal judicial interference in arbitration.

03 December, 2025 01:40 AM
partner-cannot-invoke-arbitration-clause-without-express-authorisation-of-other-partners-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Partner Cannot Invoke Arbitration Clause Without Express Authorisation of Other Partners: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court rules that a partner cannot invoke an arbitration clause or seek appointment of an arbitrator without express authorisation from co-partners.

03 December, 2025 05:19 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email