38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Kunal Kamra Issues Notice To IndiGo Against Travel Ban; Demands Compensation Of 25 Lacs

By LawStreet News Network      01 February, 2020 11:02 PM      0 Comments
Kunal Kamra Issues Notice To IndiGo Against Travel Ban; Demands Compensation Of 25 Lacs

Standup comedian Kunal Kamra has issued a legal notice to IndiGo airlines today (February 1, 2020) against the travel ban of 6 months imposed on him. IndiGo had imposed the travel ban after he allegedly heckled journalist Arnab Goswami aboard IndiGo flight 6E 5317 from Mumbai to Lucknow. 

Soon after the video surfaced online, Civil Aviation Minister Hardeep Puri tweeted, Offensive behaviour designed to provoke & create disturbance inside an aircraft is absolutely unacceptable and endangers safety of air travellers. We are left with no option but to advise other airlines to impose similar restrictions on the person concerned. 

Prominent airlines Air India, SpiceJet and GoAir have banned Kunal Kamra from taking the flight as well. 

The controversy arose after Kunal Kamra posted a video on his twitter handle, in which he is heard making a monologue in front of Goswami wherein he is seen asking the journalist if he is a coward or a journalist.

The legal notice, issued through Advocate Prashant Sivarajan, Partner at Lawmen and White calls the ban an illegal, high-handed and arbitrary action taken against Kamra and demands an unconditional apology from the airline in all leading newspapers as well as electronic media and all social media platforms currently being operated by the airlines. 

Apart from this, a compensation of Rs. 25,00,000 has been demanded from the airlines on account of the mental pain and agony suffered by him as well as cancellation of his scheduled shows and programmes in India as well as abroad. 

The notice also demanded actions against the officials who took the decision. The notice says that the action was in abrogation of the Directorate General of Civil Aviation's (DGCA) Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR) as notified under Rule 133A entailing imposition of penalty under S. No.13 of Category III of Schedule VI of the Aircraft Rules, 1937. 

The legal notice states that Kamra's tiff with Goswami was an exercise of his right to freedom of speech and expression as enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution of India, 1949.

The notice also states that freedom to travel, both within and outside the confines of India, has been regarded as an important part of the expression personal liberty occurring in Article 21 of the Constitution. 

Author: Shubham Jindal



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email