38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, September 16, 2024
Executive

Ban Imposed On Comedian Kunal Kamra Not Illegal, Clarifies DGCA

By LawStreet News Network      31 January, 2020 01:01 PM      0 Comments
Ban Imposed On Comedian Kunal Kamra Not Illegal, Clarifies DGCA

After questions were raised on the ban imposed on comedian Kunal Kamra, by four major domestic airlines, including IndiGo, Air India, Go Air and Spice jet, the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) in a statement on Wednesday (January 29, 2020) said, "This is to reiterate that the action taken by the airlines is in complete consonance with Civil Aviation Requirements (CAR) Section-3, Series M Part VI on handling of unruly passengers."  It further added, "Now the matter is to be referred to the internal committee as prescribed in para 6.1 of the said CAR (Civil Aviation Requirements). Further, as per para 6.4 of the CAR, the internal committee is to give the final decision in 30 days by giving the reasons in writing, which shall be binding on the airline concerned. Punishment for different type of unruly behaviour is also prescribed in the same CAR and the internal committee has to adhere to the same."

After Kunal Kamra, a Mumbai based comedian tweeted a video, where he is seen confronting Republic TV journalist Arnab Goswami, asking him whether he is a coward or a journalist, throughout the 1.51 minute video Arnab doesnt respond to any of Karmas questions. The airlines was quick to take an action and barred Kamra from flying with them for a period of 6 months. The Minister of State for Civil Aviation Hardeep Singh Puri, also tweeted about the incident and advised other airlines to take same measures. Following which Air India, Spice jet and Go Air have banned Karma till further notice. 



Arun Kumar, the Director General of Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) speaking to a HuffPost journalist  said that a 6 months' ban on Kunal Kamra by IndiGo and subsequent bans announced by other airlines, is a violation of the Civil Aviation Requirement Rules, under CAR Section 3, Series M, PartVI on Handling of Unruly Passengers. Further Kumar explained that in case of any unruly behaviour, like verbal spats or confrontations, the airlines should first impose a temporary ban of 30 days on the passenger and order an internal enquiry into the incident headed by a retired judge.

According to the CAR rules unruly behaviour that is verbally unruly, and in those cases operator can debar a passenger for upto 3 months, but in Kamras case the airlines have announced a 6 months' ban even though there was only verbal confrontation as seen in the video. Further the rules require a complaint to be made to the pilot-in-command, which would be probed by an internal committee ordered by the airlines and headed by a district and sessions judge and should have representatives from different scheduled airlines, passengers association/consumer, association/retired officer of Consumer Dispute Redressal Forum as members. The internal committee will decide the matter within 30 days and give a specified period of ban on the unruly passenger. 

While the committee conducts its enquiry and the airline may ban the said passenger. The airlines are further required to share the non-fly list with DGCA and other operators and same shall be published on DGCA website but other airlines are not bound by the no-fly list. In Kamras case no inquiry was held before IndiGo announced a 6 months' ban. DGCA has in its statement also stated director Arun Kumars statements to HuffPost India were misrepresented and the ban imposed on Kamra adhere to the rules laid down in CAR. 

Author: Antra Shourya 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

broadcasting-bill-2024-will-it-destroy-the-content-creator-industry
Trending Know The Law
Broadcasting Bill 2024: Will It Destroy the Content Creator Industry?

The withdrawal of the 2024 Draft Broadcast Bill sparks more debate than clarity, leaving both the media and legal sectors questioning the future of digital regulation.

10 September, 2024 10:49 AM
allahabad-hc-dismisses-review-plea-imposes-1-lakh-fine-for-baseless-allegations-against-senior-advocates-and-judges
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC dismisses review plea, imposes ₹1 Lakh fine for baseless allegations against Senior Advocates and Judges [Read Order]

The Allahabad High Court dismissed a review plea, imposing ₹1 lakh costs for misuse of legal process and baseless allegations against senior advocates and judges.

10 September, 2024 11:32 AM
allahabad-hc-trial-courts-prohibited-from-issuing-sec-164-crpc-statements-before-taking-cognisance
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC: Trial Courts prohibited from issuing Sec 164 CrPC Statements before taking cognisance [Read Order]

Allahabad HC directs trial courts to stop issuing Section 164 CrPC statements before cognizance, emphasizing confidentiality and Supreme Court rulings.

10 September, 2024 11:53 AM
poker-and-rummy-are-games-of-skill-not-gambling-allahabad-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Poker and Rummy are games of skill, not gambling: Allahabad High Court [Read Order]

The Allahabad High Court ruled that poker and rummy are games of skill, not gambling, and directed authorities to reconsider denied gaming unit permissions.

10 September, 2024 12:08 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email