38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, January 12, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Petition Filed In Bombay HC Against Salman Khans Movie Loveratri For Defaming Navratri

By LawStreet News Network      04 September, 2018 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Petition Filed In Bombay HC Against Salman Khans Movie  Loveratri For Defaming Navratri

Advocate Ajaykumar Waghmare has moved the Aurangabad bench of the High Court against Salman Khans production Loveratri, claiming that it distorts the famous Hindu festival of Navratri and is derogatory to all women. The advocate further states that the film being released in and around the period of Navratri is sacrilegious in its intention.

The petitioner Waghmare states that the title of the movie has intentionally affected the standing of Hindus and Hinduism adversely whereas the respondents (makers of the film) have used this name only for their pecuniary interestby its title, the respondents seek to portray Navratri as only a festival full of lewdness and amorousness.

The petitioner further stated that Navratri is a nine-day long festival celebrated by Hindus across India and these nine-days are considered of great religious significance and whatever is being shown in trailers of the film is nothing but an attempt to defame and malign the reputation and image of Hindu religion and all womanhood.

The petitioner prayed that the makers drop the word Loveratri as the title of the film and that the makers of the film be directed to issue an unconditional apology to all Hindus and all women.

The petitioner had earlier also moved the High Court against Jolly LLB-2 contending that the film defames the legal profession and shows lawyers and judges in a bad light.

The film Loveratri is set to hit theatres on October 5, 2018 and stars Salman Khans brother in law Ayush Sharma.

 



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

wrong-bail-orders-alone-without-evidence-of-corruption-cannot-justify-removal-of-judicial-officer-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wrong Bail Orders Alone, Without Evidence of Corruption, Cannot Justify Removal of Judicial Officer: SC [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court rules that wrong bail orders alone cannot justify removal of a judicial officer without proof of corruption, misconduct, or extraneous considerations.

06 January, 2026 07:43 PM
divorced-muslim-woman-can-seek-maintenance-under-crpc-even-after-receiving-amount-under-muslim-women-protection-act-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Divorced Muslim Woman Can Seek Maintenance Under CrPC Even After Receiving Amount Under Muslim Women Protection Act: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala High Court holds that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC even after receiving amounts under the 1986 Act.

06 January, 2026 08:19 PM
delhi-hc-full-bench-settles-bsf-seniority-dispute-rule-of-continuous-regular-appointment-prevails
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Full Bench Settles BSF Seniority Dispute; Rule of ‘Continuous Regular Appointment’ Prevails [Read Judgment]

Delhi High Court Full Bench rules BSF seniority is based on date of continuous regular appointment, rejecting claims for antedated seniority due to delayed joining.

06 January, 2026 08:45 PM
borrowers-cannot-invoke-writ-jurisdiction-to-compel-banks-to-extend-one-time-settlement-benefits-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Borrowers Cannot Invoke Writ Jurisdiction to Compel Banks to Extend One-Time Settlement Benefits: Kerala HC [Read Judgment]

Kerala High Court holds borrowers cannot invoke writ jurisdiction to compel banks to grant One-Time Settlement benefits, as OTS is not a legal right.

07 January, 2026 09:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email