38.6c New Delhi, India, Thursday, April 02, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

SC Grants Interim Protection to Poonam Pandey in Film Case [Read Order]

By Harshvardhan Sharma      19 January, 2022 01:21 PM      0 Comments
Poonam Pandey Pornographic film case

Poonam Shobhanath Pandey, an actress and model, was given temporary protection from arrest on Tuesday in a porn video case in which Raj Kundra, the husband of fellow actress Shilpa Shetty, is one of the key defendants [Poonam Shobhanath Pandey v. State of Maharashtra].

Pandey's appeal against the Bombay High Court's rejection of her plea was given notice by a bench of Justices Vineet Saran and BV Nagarathna.

"The appellant was not subjected to any coercion. Publish a notification, "The Court made the decision.

Pandey had applied for anticipatory bail in connection with the porn racket case in which Raj Kundra, actress Shilpa Shetty's husband, had been detained.

On November 25, 2021, the Bombay High Court denied Pandey's request for relief, prompting an appeal to the Supreme Court.

The case stemmed from a complaint filed by Madhukar Krishan Keni against obscene material on several websites and online platforms.

While Pandey is not a partner or owner of any of those platforms, the accusation against her is that some video betraying her is available on some of those websites, according to her plea.

Pandey stated in her plea that she was a victim and not a defendant in this case. It was also stated that the Central government has already blacklisted all footage of Pandey on various porn websites back in 2015.

Pandey was represented by advocate on record Soayib Qureshi, advocate Sandeep Bajaj, and advocate Aditya Chopra (Managing Partner - Victoriam Legalis, Advocates & Solicitors).

[Read Order]



Share this article:

About:

Advocate Harshvardhan Sharma, founder and Editor-in-Chief of LawStreet Journal, is an award-winning ...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS


TOP STORIES

section-377-ipc-not-applicable-to-consensual-sexual-acts-between-husband-and-wife-during-marriage-mp-high-court
Trending Judiciary
Section 377 IPC Not Applicable to Consensual Sexual Acts Between Husband and Wife During Marriage: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court holds Section 377 IPC not applicable to sexual acts between husband and wife, partly quashing FIR in dowry and abuse case.

27 March, 2026 03:44 PM
mention-of-quantity-type-in-arrest-notice-sufficient-under-bnss-exact-quantity-not-mandatory-kerala-hc
Trending Judiciary
Mention of Quantity Type in Arrest Notice Sufficient Under BNSS, Exact Quantity Not Mandatory: Kerala HC [Read Order]

Kerala HC rules that mentioning nature of contraband quantity in arrest notice is sufficient under BNSS; exact quantity need not be specified.

27 March, 2026 04:07 PM
court-grants-interim-anticipatory-bail-to-accused-in-5-crore-cyber-fraud-case-directs-joining-of-investigation-on-notice-through-whatsapp
Trending Judiciary
Court Grants Interim Anticipatory Bail to Accused in ₹5 Crore Cyber Fraud Case; Directs Joining of Investigation on Notice Through WhatsApp [Read Order]

Tis Hazari Court grants interim anticipatory bail in ₹5 crore cyber fraud case; allows WhatsApp notice and bars coercive action against accused.

27 March, 2026 05:22 PM
gujarat-hc-sets-aside-order-forcing-minor-and-mother-to-attend-court-weekly-for-grandfathers-visitation
Trending Judiciary
Gujarat HC Sets Aside Order Forcing Minor and Mother to Attend Court Weekly for Grandfather’s Visitation [Read Judgment]

Gujarat HC sets aside Family Court order mandating weekly court visits for a minor child, stressing child welfare and calling the approach unjust.

27 March, 2026 06:05 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email