38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, April 25, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Delhi HC Grants Interim Relief in Piracy Case of Salman Khans Film Radhe; Directs WhatsApp to Suspend Accounts Involved in Illegal Circulation [READ ORDER]

By Mathews Savio      25 May, 2021 01:48 PM      0 Comments
Salman Khan Movie Radhe Delhi hc

In a petition filed by Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd., Delhi High Court ordered WhatsApp and similar social media platforms to suspend accounts involved in illegal circulation and storage of Salman Khan's Film "Radhe: You Most Wanted Bhai.

The matter was heard by a single member bench comprising Justice Sanjeev Narula.

 Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. is the exclusive licensee and holds exploitative rights in the movie. The movie was released on the online streaming service ("Zee5") of the petitioner on 13th May 2021on a pay per view basis. 

It is the case of the petitioner that soon after the release of the movie on the streaming platform, pirated copies of the film and video clips from the movie began to be circulated on messaging platforms like WhatsApp. 

The petitioner submitted that on 14th May 2021, a complaint was registered with the Inspector General of Police, Maharashtra Cyber Digital Crime Unit, under the Copyright Act, 1957 against unknown persons, including some of the defendants. It was also submitted that the petitioner had reached out to WhatsApp and informed them about the numbers from which the pirated material was being circulated. But the petitioners alleged that no reply was received from WhatsApp.

The petition also adds Defendant No. 13 as 'Ashok Kumar' (a practice similar to the use of the term 'John Doe' in copyright cases in the US) in order so that the order by the court will be effective against all unidentified infringers of the petitioners copyright.

Senior Advocate Amit Sibal appearing for the petitioner, argued that the circulation and storage of the pirated copies on social media infringe the petitioner's copyright under Section 51(a)(i) of the Copyright Act, 1957. The counsel also submitted several screenshots of WhatsApp messages which allegedly infringes the petitioners copyright. 

The counsel for the petitioner also quoted WhatsApp's Terms of Service to argue that the circulation of the video clips and pirated copies of the movie violates these terms.

The Telecom Service Providers for the alleged infringers are also impleaded as defendants in the petition along with eight identified infringers and WhatsApp.

On consideration of the screenshots, the court concluded that the alleged infringers are not only circulating but are also selling the pirated copies through the messaging platforms.

The court observed that:

. the Plaintiff has established a prima facie case in its favour. The balance of convenience also lies in favour of the Plaintiff, and an irreparable loss would be caused to the Plaintiff in case an ex-parte interim injunction is not granted. Accordingly, till the next date of hearing, Defendant Nos. 1 to 8 and 13, their servants, agents, legal representatives, heirs and any other person acting for or on their behalf are restrained from unauthorisedly storing, reproducing, communicating, disseminating, circulating, copying, selling, offering for sale or making available copies of the film or any other portion thereof, through WhatsApp or any other means or modes, that may infringe the Plaintiffs copyright in the film.

It was further ordered that:

Further, the Defendant No. 9, is directed to forthwith suspend the WhatsApp accounts of Defendant Nos. 4 and 8 to ensure that the said Defendants cease the infringement of the Plaintiffs copyright on WhatsApp. It is further directed that in the event the Plaintiff brings to the notice of Defendant No. 9, that any other WhatsApp account is being used for the purpose of selling infringing copies of the film, the Defendant No. 9 shall as expeditiously as possible, and not later than 24 hours from the receipt of the request from the Plaintiff, suspend such accounts.

The court also ordered the Telecom Service Providers to disclose the details of the infringers registered with them within three days so that further action can be taken against them.

 

[READ ORDER] 



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

madras-hc-directs-tahsildar-to-issues-no-caste-no-religion-certificate-to-cine-actor-r-partibhan
Trending CelebStreet
Madras HC Directs Tahsildar To Issues “No Caste No Religion” Certificate To Cine Actor R. Partibhan [Read Order]

Madras High Court directs Tahsildar to issue “No Caste No Religion” certificate to actor R. Parthiban, citing delay and earlier Division Bench precedent.

24 April, 2026 05:54 PM
ngt-halts-omaxes-dwarka-sports-arena-over-illegal-tree-felling-and-missing-environmental-clearance
Trending Environment
NGT Halts Omaxe’s Dwarka Sports Arena Over Illegal Tree Felling and Missing Environmental Clearance [Read Order]

NGT halts Omaxe’s Dwarka project over illegal tree felling and lack of environmental clearance, rejecting the developer’s “deemed EC” defence.

24 April, 2026 06:00 PM

TOP STORIES

transgender-rights-in-india-at-a-crossroads-progress-or-regression
Trending Vantage Points
Transgender Rights in India at a Crossroads: Progress or Regression?

India’s 2026 Transgender Law Amendment Sparks Debate: Progress or Rollback? Concerns rise over loss of self-identification and increased medical control.

20 April, 2026 02:00 PM
delhi-hc-pronounces-judgment-on-kejriwals-recusal-plea-against-justice-swarna-kanta-sharma-in-liquor-policy-case
Trending Judiciary
Delhi HC Pronounces Judgment on Kejriwal’s Recusal Plea Against Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma in Liquor Policy Case

Delhi High Court rejects Kejriwal’s recusal plea, holding allegations of bias against Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma insufficient in liquor policy case.

21 April, 2026 11:16 AM
sc-dismisses-umar-khalids-review-petition-against-judgment-denying-bail-in-delhi-riots-larger-conspiracy-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Umar Khalid’s Review Petition Against Judgment Denying Bail in Delhi Riots Larger Conspiracy Case [Read Order]

Supreme Court dismisses Umar Khalid’s review plea against bail denial in Delhi riots conspiracy case, finding no grounds to interfere with its earlier judgment.

21 April, 2026 11:58 AM
nashik-court-denies-interim-arrest-protection-to-nida-ejaz-khan-in-tcs-bpo-harassment-case-bail-hearing-set-for-april-27
Trending Crime, Police And Law
Nashik Court Denies Interim Arrest Protection to Nida Ejaz Khan in TCS BPO Harassment Case; Bail Hearing Set for April 27

Nashik Court denies interim arrest protection to Nida Ejaz Khan in TCS BPO harassment case; anticipatory bail hearing adjourned to April 27.

21 April, 2026 01:37 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email