38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, January 10, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

"Set out specific allegations": Delhi HC to MS Dhoni's ex-business partner in defamation case against Dhoni and others

By Shreya Agarwal      29 January, 2024 12:36 PM      0 Comments

NEW DELHI: Hearing a defamation matter against former team India captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni and others, the Delhi High Court today directed the plaintiffs (Dhoni's former business partners) to set out specific allegations against each defendant. 

The Court has listed the matter for hearing next on April 3.

Cricketer Mahendra Singh Dhoni told the Delhi High Court today that the defamation suit filed against him for Rs. 15 crores damages is not maintainable. He argued that he has merely filed a case against Diwakar in a Ranchi court. 

The suit has been filed against Meta, X (formerly Twitter), Google, YouTube and 30 media houses and web portals. Dhoni's counsel appeared before Justice Prathiba M Singh and submitted that the suit was not maintainable against his client and that the cricketer had merely filed a case against Diwakar in Ranchi. 

News agency ANI, on the other hand argued that specific allegations had not been set out in the plaint, therefore, the same was not maintainable. 

However, Diwakar argued that media reporting on the matter had caused damage to his reputation as they had already labelled him a thug and thief.

Earlier, the Court had directed for intimation of the said suit to be given to Dhoni and the law firm representing him while scheduling it for hearing on Jan 29.

While the Diwakars had argued before Court that an injunction order can be passed even in cases which are sub judice (pending before the Court) before a court, Adv. Siddhant Kumar, representing news agency ANI, submitted that the suit is not maintainable as per the decision of a coordinate bench in Veer Arjun Newspaper Pvt. Ltd. v. Bahori Lal & Ors. (2013).

He also submitted that the media house is fully protected under the exception to Section 499 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, as the reporting merely covered the proceedings in the pending criminal case before the Ranchi Court.

Brief facts

Filed by Diwakar and his wife Soumya Das, the suit seeks a permanent injunction and damages against Dhoni, various social media platforms such as Meta, X (formerly Twitter), Google, YouTube and 30 media houses and web portals. 

The duo alleged that Dhoni has published defamatory and malicious statements against them on social media and in a press conference, alleging that they illegally gained Rs. 15 crores from the cricketer.

Besides the suit wherein they claim that the allegations by Dhoni are wild, false, baseless, vindictive, malicious and unfounded, they have also filed a criminal complaint against Dhoni which is pending adjudication in a court in Ranchi.

In 2017, an authorization letter was allegedly issued in favour of Diwakar's company, Aarka Sports Management Authority Pvt Ltd, for MS Dhoni Cricket Academy in pursuance of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) to establish a chain of cricket academies and sports complexes.

In August 2021, the said letter was revoked vide an email by an unknown third party, as per the suit. The couple claim that till date, no official letter of revocation has been received by Diwakar and thus, the email cannot be understood as a legal and valid revocation in law. 

Cause Title: Mihir Diwakar & Anr. v. Mahendra Singh Dhoni & Ors.



Share this article:

About:

A wanderer, aspiring yogini and writer. Shreya is a lawyer by profession, journalist by passion. A g...Read more

Follow:
FacebookTwitterLinkedinInstagram


Leave a feedback about this
Related Posts
View All

Delhi HC to hear defamation case against former team India captain MS Dhoni on Jan 29 Delhi HC to hear defamation case against former team India captain MS Dhoni on Jan 29

Former team India captain pulled up in a defamation case by former business partner Mihir Diwakar and wife Soumya Das in Delhi HC.

"Set out specific allegations": Delhi HC to MS Dhoni's ex-business partner in defamation case against Dhoni and others "Set out specific allegations": Delhi HC to MS Dhoni's ex-business partner in defamation case against Dhoni and others

Delhi HC hears defamation case against former team India captain Mahendra Singh Dhoni and others by Dhoni's former business partner Mihir Diwakar, and his wife.

TRENDING NEWS

indias-business-families-seek-regulatory-recognition-of-daughters-in-law-as-relatives-under-sebi-takeover-norms
Trending Business
India’s Business Families Seek Regulatory Recognition of Daughters-in-Law as ‘Relatives’ Under SEBI Takeover Norms

Indian business families urge SEBI to recognise daughters-in-law as relatives under takeover norms, citing succession planning, trusts, gender equality and compliance risks.

09 January, 2026 05:58 PM
sc-bail-for-accused-added-under-section-319-crpc-requires-strong-and-cogent-evidence-not-mere-probability-of-complicity
Trending Judiciary
SC: Bail for Accused Added Under Section 319 CrPC Requires Strong and Cogent Evidence, Not Mere Probability of Complicity [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that bail for accused added under Section 319 CrPC requires strong and cogent evidence, not mere probability of complicity.

09 January, 2026 06:04 PM

TOP STORIES

regulating-hate-restricting-speech-an-analysis-of-the-karnataka-hate-speech-and-hate-crimes-bill-2025
Trending Executive
Regulating Hate, Restricting Speech ? An Analysis Of The Karnataka Hate Speech And Hate Crimes Bill, 2025

Analysis of Karnataka’s Hate Speech Bill, 2025, examining vague definitions, harsh penalties, executive powers, and its impact on free speech.

04 January, 2026 12:48 AM
if-memorial-for-stan-swamy-permitted-on-private-land-no-bar-for-stupa-commemorating-victory-over-colonial-forces-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
If Memorial for Stan Swamy Permitted on Private Land, No Bar for Stupa Commemorating Victory Over Colonial Forces: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court held that no government permission is needed to erect a memorial stupa on private patta land, citing the Stan Swamy memorial precedent.

05 January, 2026 05:35 PM
sc-denies-bail-to-umar-khalid-sharjeel-imam-in-2020-delhi-riots-conspiracy-case-grants-bail-to-five-others
Trending Judiciary
SC Denies Bail to Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam in 2020 Delhi Riots Conspiracy Case; Grants Bail to Five Others

Supreme Court denies bail to Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in the 2020 Delhi riots conspiracy case, while granting bail to five co-accused.

05 January, 2026 05:55 PM
allahabad-hc-holds-commercial-division-of-high-court-as-proper-forum-for-enforcement-of-domestic-awards-in-international-commercial-arbitration
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC holds Commercial Division of High Court as proper forum for enforcement of domestic awards in international commercial arbitration [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court rules that domestic arbitral awards in international commercial arbitration seated in India must be enforced before the High Court’s Commercial Division.

05 January, 2026 06:11 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email