38.6c New Delhi, India, Sunday, May 26, 2024

Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Ban On Former Cricketer Sreesanth

By LawStreet News Network      15 March, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Supreme Court Sets Aside Life Ban On Former Cricketer Sreesanth

The Supreme Court today (March 15, 2019) set aside the life ban on former Indian cricketer S. Sreesanth in a case of spot-fixing and asked the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) to re-examine its quantum of punishment.

A Bench comprising of Justices Ashok Bhushan and K.M. Joseph observed that the life ban imposed on the cricketer is “too harsh” and asked the BCCI disciplinary committee to review the quantum of his punishment in three months. The Bench, however, upheld his indictment in the wake of the 2013 Indian Premier League (IPL) spot-fixing scandal.

The judgment was passed on an appeal filed by Sreesanth against the judgment of the Kerala High Court, which had affirmed the life ban imposed by BCCI.

In August 2017, a single-judge Bench of the Kerala High Court had lifted the life ban imposed on Sreesanth by BCCI. But later on, the life ban was restored by a division Bench on an appeal filed by the board.

Senior advocate Salman Khurshid, appearing for Sreesanth, told the Bench that "In the context of facts and manner in which these things have happened, this court should consider that it (life ban on Sreesanth by BCCI) is unfair. He has suffered for the last five-six years. People want him to play cricket. He was extremely loyal to BCCI.”

Khurshid argued before the Bench, that it was not established that spot-fixing was done in the match played between Indian Premier League teams Rajasthan Royals and Kings XI Punjab in Mohali in May 2013 and there was no evidence that the cricketer received any money for this. "The team (Rajasthan Royals) and its owners were banned for two years only. It is completely unfair that this (life ban) has happened with him (Sreesanth)," Khurshid said.

Further, Khurshid told the Bench that the confession made by the cricketer was due to continuous torture by Delhi Police. “According to Sreesanth, police had threatened to implicate his family if he does not confess to the crime,” the lawyer added. The Bench had on March 1, 2019, reserved its judgment on Sreesanth's appeal.

Share this article:

User Avatar

Leave a feedback about this

Trending Judiciary
Courts this Week: Law Street Journal's Weekly Round-Up of SC & HCs [May 20 - May 25]

Get the latest updates from the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts ! Here’s a round up of the week's top legal stories in a quick, easy-to-read summary.

26 May, 2024 11:25 AM


Trending Judiciary
Supreme Court refuses to entertain plea for stay on new criminal laws

SC refuses plea to stay new criminal laws. Court deems the plea casual, noting laws aren't yet implemented. Petitioner withdraws. Laws effective from July 1, 2024.

20 May, 2024 12:58 PM
Trending Know The Law
SCBA Election Result 2024, Know the newly elected members

SCBA Election Result 2024: Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal elected President. Know the newly elected members and key office bearers leading the Supreme Court Bar Association.

20 May, 2024 03:03 PM
Trending Judiciary
Cannot Allow the Game of Hide and Seek for Committing Murder of an Unborn Child: MP High Court [Read Order]

MP High Court denies abortion for minor rape victim, condemns misuse of legal authority to terminate pregnancy and prevent justice.

20 May, 2024 03:52 PM
Trending Judiciary
Pune Porsche Hit & Run: Bail Granted to 17 Year Old in Under 14 Hours, Asked to write essay

Bail granted to 17-year-old in Pune Porsche hit-and-run case within 14 hours. Conditions include educational tasks, supervision, and counseling. Incident killed two.

20 May, 2024 04:30 PM


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email