38.6c New Delhi, India, Wednesday, April 01, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
CelebStreet

Tanushree Dutta Sexual Harassment Case: Police Files Closure Report Says Not Enough Evidence Against Nana Patekar

By LawStreet News Network      13 June, 2019 12:00 AM      0 Comments
Tanushree Dutta Sexual Harassment Case: Police Files Closure Report Says Not Enough Evidence Against Nana Patekar

Mumbai police have filed a closure report in the case of sexual harassment filed against actor Nana Patekar by Tanushree Dutta stating that they have not found enough evidence.

The suburban Oshiwara police on June 12, 2019, filed a 'B Summary' report before a metropolitan magistrate in Andheri, Deputy Commissioner of Police Paramjit Singh Dahiya told PTI.

A 'B-Summary' report is filed when the police do not find any evidence against the accused person to file a charge sheet and seek trial.

According to Times Now, the actress - who triggered the #MeToo movement in Bollywood last year when she had accused Patekar of harassment during the shooting of their 2009 film 'Horn 'OK' Pleassss' - has said she will continue the fight and is going to challenge the order.

Dutta's lawyer, Nitin Satpute, speaking to Times Now, also said, "We havent yet received any official communication from the police yet. However, we will challenge the closure report."

During the investigations, Satpute had claimed that the right witnesses were not been brought forward.

Dutta filed a complaint against Patekar in October 2018 in which she accused him of harassing and misbehaving with her while shooting a song on the sets of the film Horn Ok Pleasss in 2008. She also alleged that during the shooting of the song sequence, Patekar inappropriately touched her even after she had clearly mentioned that she will not perform lewd, vulgar or uncomfortable steps.

On his part, Nana Patekar has denied all the accusations and said that there 'was no question of him molesting her' as there were around 50 people on set. Through his lawyer, he said that it was 'a figment of her imagination'.



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

calcutta-hc-dismisses-pil-challenging-ecis-mass-transfer-of-officers-in-west-bengal
Trending Judiciary
Calcutta HC Dismisses PIL Challenging ECI’s Mass Transfer of Officers in West Bengal [Read Judgment]

Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL challenging ECI’s mass transfer of officers in West Bengal, upholding its powers under Article 324.

31 March, 2026 05:49 PM

TOP STORIES

sc-reverses-high-court-acquittal-in-child-rape-case-directs-all-high-courts-to-strictly-follow-ban-on-disclosure-of-victims-identity
Trending Judiciary
SC Reverses High Court Acquittal In Child Rape Case; Directs All High Courts To Strictly Follow Ban On Disclosure Of Victim’s Identity [Read Judgment]

SC restores conviction in child rape case, reverses acquittal, and directs strict compliance with law prohibiting disclosure of victim identity.

26 March, 2026 02:05 PM
allahabad-hc-grants-anticipatory-bail-to-swami-avimukteshwaranand-saraswati-in-pocso-case-rules-section-29-presumption-not-applicable-at-pre-arrest-stage
Trending Judiciary
Allahabad HC Grants Anticipatory Bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati in POCSO Case, Rules Section 29 Presumption Not Applicable at Pre-Arrest Stage [Read Order]

Allahabad High Court grants anticipatory bail to Swami Avimukteshwaranand Saraswati, rules Section 29 POCSO presumption not applicable at pre-arrest stage.

26 March, 2026 02:25 PM
karnataka-hc-quashes-fir-against-sri-sri-ravi-shankar-in-bengaluru-land-encroachment-case
Trending Judiciary
Karnataka HC Quashes FIR Against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar In Bengaluru Land Encroachment Case

Karnataka HC quashes FIR against Sri Sri Ravi Shankar in Bengaluru land encroachment case, holding no direct role and limiting relief to him alone.

26 March, 2026 03:00 PM
sc-dismisses-challenge-to-mha-circular-on-vande-mataram-terms-apprehensions-premature
Trending Judiciary
SC Dismisses Challenge to MHA Circular on ‘Vande Mataram’; Terms Apprehensions Premature

Supreme Court dismisses plea against MHA’s ‘Vande Mataram’ circular, calls concerns premature as directive is advisory with no mandatory or penal effect.

26 March, 2026 04:46 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email