38.6c New Delhi, India, Saturday, February 21, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Aarushi Talwar Murder Case: A New Turn Of Events

By LawStreet News Network      16 July, 2019 12:07 PM      0 Comments

On the morning of May 16, 2008, Aarushi Talwar, 14-year-old, was found murdered in her bedroom with her throat slit and a bludgeoned head. Familys domestic help, Hemraj, was suspected of the murder. A day later, his body was found on the terrace of the Talwar residence.

The matter soon plunged to spotlight and garnered enough media attention. On October 12, 2017, Allahabad High Court reversed the life sentence and acquitted main convicts, Rajesh and Nupur Talwar.

Heres the timeline of events :

May 18: Noida police probed investigation; suspected murder done with a surgical instrument, insiders job suspected. Aarushis postmortem report ruled out sexual assault.

May 19: Police suspected former domestic help, Vishnu Sharma.

May 21: Delhi police joined the probe; suspects murder committed by a doctor or a butcher.

May 22: Police investigated with an angle of honour killing. Rajesh and Nupur Talwar, Aarushis parents, came under suspicion. Police quizzed Aarushis close friend.

May 23: Police arrested Rajesh Talwar on the charge of killing his daughter, Aarushi and domestic help, Hemraj.

June 1: CBI took over the case.

June 13: Krishna, domestic help of Talwars, arrested after a polygraph test and Narco analysis test.

June 19: Rajesh Talwars judicial custody extended up to July 2, 2008.

June 20: A second lie detector test conducted on Rajesh Talwar, after the first one was inconclusive.

June 25: A second lie detector test is conducted on Nupur Talwar, Aarushis mother, as first lie detector test was inconclusive.

June 26: Rajesh Talwars bail plea is refused by the special magistrate in Ghaziabad. CBI declared it as a blind case.

July 3: SC rejected plea that challenged the narco-analysis test conducted on the accused.

July 12: Ghaziabad Court gives bail to Rajesh Talwar.

Year 2009

February: Narco-Analysis test conducted on Rajesh Talwar.

December: CBI closes the case citing insufficient evidence. Talwars still remain prime suspects.

Year 2011

February 9: Court charges Aarushis parents with murder and destruction of evidence. Bailable warrants issued against them.

February 21: Couple approaches Allahabad High Court for quashing high court summons.

March 18: HC orders to initiate proceedings against Talwars after dismissing their plea to quash summon.

March 19: Talwars approaches the Supreme Court.

2012

January 6: SC dismisses the plea and allows proceedings.

June 11: Trial started before Special Judge S Lal.

April 30: Nupur Talwar, wife of Rajesh Talwar, was arrested.

May 25: Ghaziabad court charged Talwars with murder, conspiracy, and destruction of evidence.

September 25: Supreme Court ordered to release Nupur Talwar on bail.

2013

December: The Talwars convicted of double murder case and sentenced to life imprisonment by a special CBI court in Ghaziabad. Sent to Dasna jail.

2014

January 21: Talwars filed plea in Allahabad High Court against the CBIs life sentence.

2016

September 5: Nupur Talwar released on parole for three weeks after her ailing mother needed attention.

2017

January 11: Allahabad HC reserves judgement on life sentence.

October 12: Aarushis parents acquitted by Allahabad High Court.

After almost 10 years, the main accused are acquitted by the Allahabad High Court on the basis of same charge sheet on which they were once convicted on by the district court. The raises a series of questions here:

What compelled the district court to take a judgement on the charge sheet while AHC dismissed it saying lack of evidence?

Is District Court to be held contempt for passing a misjudgment?

After the release, what are we supposed to call those parents? Are the main accused or suspects or convicts? How are they suppose to survive in the society where their image were tainted by the Police, CBI, Court, and media?

And the biggest question: Who killed Aarushi and Hemraj?



Share this article:

User Avatar
About:


Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

homoeopathy-practitioner-cannot-prescribe-allopathy-medicines-telangana-hc
Trending Judiciary
Homoeopathy Practitioner Cannot Prescribe Allopathy Medicines: Telangana HC [Read Order]

Supreme Court holds homoeopathy practitioners cannot prescribe allopathy drugs; Telangana HC quashes FIR on procedural lapse under NMCA.

20 February, 2026 11:28 AM
contractual-bar-on-interest-claims-overrides-interest-act-kerala-high-court-order-set-aside-sc
Trending Judiciary
Contractual Bar on Interest Claims Overrides Interest Act; Kerala High Court Order Set Aside: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules that contractual clauses barring interest claims override the Interest Act, setting aside Kerala High Court’s order on delayed payments.

20 February, 2026 11:43 AM

TOP STORIES

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM
sc-sets-aside-anticipatory-bail-granted-to-absconding-murder-accused-in-madhya-pradesh-political-rivalry-case
Trending Judiciary
SC Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Granted To Absconding Murder Accused In Madhya Pradesh Political Rivalry Case [Read Judgment]

Supreme Court sets aside anticipatory bail to absconding murder accused in MP political rivalry case, calls HC order perverse and unjustified.

16 February, 2026 03:59 PM
places-of-worship-act-does-not-protect-illegal-encroachments-on-government-land-madras-hc
Trending Judiciary
Places of Worship Act Does Not Protect Illegal Encroachments on Government Land: Madras HC [Read Order]

Madras High Court rules that Places of Worship Act, 1991 does not protect temples built on encroached government land; eviction upheld in Ramanathapuram case.

16 February, 2026 04:18 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email