38.6c New Delhi, India, Monday, February 16, 2026
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

CBI Registers Three Separate Cases in 25,000 Crore Roshini Land Scam

By M V Manasa      19 November, 2020 05:24 PM      0 Comments
CBI Registers Three Separate Cases in  25,000 Crore Roshini Land Scam

On Monday (16 November 2020), three separate cases in pursuance of the orders of Jammu and Kashmir High Court on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) related to the alleged 25,000 crores Roshini Land Scam were registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). Earlier this case was registered by Vigilance Organization, Jammu but a division bench of Jammu and Kashmir High Courthanded over the probe to CBI.

The CBI gave total details of three cases in a release, which are as under:

The very first case was registered against unknown officials of Revenue Department, Jammu with the allegations that the officers and officials of Revenue Department of District Jammu had conferred undue benefits upon the illegal occupants of the State land by knowingly ignoring the Roshini Act and Rules, thereby conferring ownership rights of the state land wrongfully to selective undeserving persons and hence caused heavy monetary losses to the State Exchequer. It said, It was further alleged that the purpose of Jammu and Kashmir State Lands (vesting of ownership rights to the occupants) Act, 2001, i.e., generation of revenue for undertaking developmental works in the state was defeated.

The second case was registered against the unknown officers and officials of the Revenue Department of District Samba with the allegations that the officers and officials of Revenue Department, District Samba had conferred undue pecuniary benefits upon the illegal occupants of the State Land by intentionally contravening the legal provisions of the Roshini Act. It said that It was further alleged that in many cases, ownership rights over the state land were conferred in favor of individuals, who were not having the recorded possession in their respective names in the revenue records. It was also alleged that the rates were not fixed by the price fixation committee, as per the provisions of the act and in many cases were not remitted to the government treasury, thereby causing huge loss to the state exchequer.

The third case was registered with the connection against a private person who is a resident of Gandhi Nagar, Jammu who are the unknown officers and officials of Revenue Department and unknown officers and officials of Jammu Development Authority (JDA) with the allegations that the Revenue officers and officials of Jammu district had entered into a criminal conspiracy with the said person and conferred the ownership rights with regard to land measuring 05 Kanal and 02 Marlas (approx.) comprised in Khasra Number 781 located at village Deeli Tehsil, Jammu District. CBI said that It was further alleged that accused in pursuance of a criminal conspiracy hatched among themselves had illegally regularised the said state land without the existence of any entry in revenue records and issued NOC in favor of the beneficiary for construction of the commercial building over the land. It further said that the investigation is still being continued.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

sc-declines-to-entertain-plea-over-alleged-anti-muslim-remarks-by-assam-cm-says-approach-hc
Trending Judiciary
SC Declines to Entertain Plea Over Alleged Anti-Muslim Remarks by Assam CM, Says Approach HC

Supreme Court asks petitioners to approach Gauhati High Court over alleged hate speech by Assam CM, declines plea for FIRs and SIT probe.

16 February, 2026 02:52 PM
can-live-in-partner-be-prosecuted-under-section-498a-ipc-sc-to-decide-scope-of-husband-in-cruelty-law
Trending Judiciary
Can Live-In Partner Be Prosecuted Under Section 498A IPC? SC To Decide Scope Of ‘Husband’ In Cruelty Law [Read Order]

Supreme Court to decide if a man in a live-in relationship can be prosecuted under Section 498A IPC for cruelty. Case to impact scope of “husband”.

16 February, 2026 03:33 PM

TOP STORIES

big-legal-tech-meet-at-delhi-hc-sc-judge-sanjay-karol-to-be-chief-guest-at-indian-law-and-ai-congress-2026
Trending Legal Insiders
Big Legal-Tech Meet at Delhi HC, SC Judge Sanjay Karol to be Chief Guest at Indian Law & AI Congress 2026

Indian Law & AI Congress 2026 at Delhi High Court on Feb 11. Justice Sanjay Karol to be chief guest. Live streaming by LawStreet Journal.

10 February, 2026 10:27 AM
kerala-hc-affirms-vicarious-liability-of-managing-director-under-section-141-ni-act-for-dishonoured-cheques
Trending Judiciary
Kerala HC Affirms Vicarious Liability of Managing Director Under Section 141 NI Act for Dishonoured Cheques [Read Order]

Kerala High Court upholds Managing Director’s vicarious liability under Section 141 NI Act in cheque dishonour case, citing Supreme Court guidelines.

10 February, 2026 11:41 AM
gauhati-hc-quashes-case-against-influencer-who-claimed-assamese-women-practise-black-magic-and-convert-men-into-animals
Trending Judiciary
Gauhati HC Quashes Case Against Influencer Who Claimed Assamese Women Practise Black Magic and Convert Men Into Animals [Read Order]

Gauhati High Court quashes case against influencer Abhishek Kar over remarks on black magic in Assam, holds offences under BNS, IT Act not made out.

11 February, 2026 03:08 PM
high-courts-cannot-nullify-arbitration-proceedings-while-substituting-arbitrators-sc
Trending Judiciary
High Courts Cannot Nullify Arbitration Proceedings While Substituting Arbitrators: SC [Read Order]

Supreme Court rules High Courts cannot nullify arbitration proceedings while appointing substitute arbitrators under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration Act.

11 February, 2026 03:58 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email