38.6c New Delhi, India, Tuesday, November 04, 2025
Top Stories Supreme Court
Political NEWS Legislative Corner Celebstreet International Videos
Subscribe Contact Us
close
Crime, Police And Law

Consumer Forum Charges a Company with Fine for supplying Faulty Water Purifier at Army Unit

By Parul Singhal      15 October, 2020 05:03 PM      0 Comments
Consumer Forum Charges a Company with Finefor supplying Faulty Water Purifier at Army Unit

A Consumer Forum recently ordered Mint Technology Pvt. Ltd. that supplied water purifiers to replace its RO plant, which stopped working within 7 months of installation, at the Central Ordinance Depot in Mumbai or provide a refund.

 The Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum in suburban Bandra also imposed a fine of Rs 20,000 on the company, & said it should have taken note of fact that its consumers were personnel of the Indian Army, & provision of clean & safe drinking water for them is the basic human right.

As per the complaint, the service provider had also given a 1-year warranty from the date of installation. Accordingly, a RO Plant was installed at the ordnance depot at a cost of Rs 3, 03,050. It became fully operational in Oct 2018, but stopped functioning within 7 months, the complaint said.

As the problem was not fixed even after repeated reminders, the ordnance depot approached the consumer forum. The service provider told the forum that the RO plant was non-functional due to a faulty membrane & it didn't fall under the warranty cover.

The Forum vide its order held company guilty for deficiency in service. The Forum said the fact that the RO plant stopped doing its main job within just 7 months of installation raises a doubt about the quality of the product.  

It said that the service provider should have taken cognizance of the fact that its consumers are personnel of the Indian Army, & provision of clean & safe drinking water to them is the basic human right.



Share this article:



Leave a feedback about this
TRENDING NEWS

no-law-student-shall-be-barred-from-exams-or-academic-progression-due-to-attendane-shortage-delhi-hc
Trending Judiciary
No Law Student Shall Be Barred From Exams Or Academic Progression Due To Attendane Shortage: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]

Delhi HC rules no law student can be barred from exams or academic progress for low attendance; directs BCI to rethink attendance norms and strengthen grievance systems.

03 November, 2025 04:03 PM
mere-refusal-to-marry-does-not-constitute-instigation-under-section-306-ipc-supreme-court
Trending Judiciary
Mere Refusal To Marry Does Not Constitute Instigation Under Section 306 IPC: Supreme Court [Read Order]

Mere refusal to marry does not amount to instigation under Section 306 IPC, rules Supreme Court, quashing FIR and holding no abetment in emotional distress cases.

03 November, 2025 04:15 PM

TOP STORIES

lawyers-to-stop-arguing-when-court-indicates-its-mind-sc
Trending Judiciary
Lawyers to stop arguing when court indicates its mind: SC [Read Judgment]

SC: Lawyers must stop arguing once court indicates its mind, stressing that harmony between Bench and Bar ensures dignified court functioning.

29 October, 2025 04:25 PM
wangchuks-detention-order-suffers-from-gross-illegality-and-arbitrariness-activists-wife-tells-sc
Trending Judiciary
Wangchuk's detention order suffers from gross illegality and arbitrariness, activist's wife tells SC

Wife of activist Sonam Wangchuk tells SC his detention under NSA suffers from illegality, citing stale FIRs, procedural lapses, and denial of fair representation.

29 October, 2025 04:35 PM
police-can-register-fir-for-threatening-witness-courts-complaint-not-needed-sc
Trending Judiciary
Police can register FIR for threatening witness; court's complaint not needed: SC [Read Judgment]

SC says police can directly file FIR for witness threats under Section 195A IPC; no court complaint needed as it’s a cognisable offence.

29 October, 2025 04:44 PM
sc-hints-at-pan-india-guidelines-on-timeline-to-frame-charges
Trending Judiciary
SC hints at pan-India guidelines on timeline to frame charges

SC mulls pan-India guidelines to curb delays in framing charges; notes cases where charges aren’t framed even after years despite BNSS mandate of 60 days.

30 October, 2025 12:22 PM

ADVERTISEMENT


Join Group

Signup for Our Newsletter

Get Exclusive access to members only content by email